You can call it what you want...Bi not Gay.
Bi , Tri or Gay. its the same "*******" <pun intended>
sexual contact between men.
You can call it what you want...Bi not Gay.
No they aren't the same.You can call it what you want...
Bi , Tri or Gay. its the same "*******" <pun intended>
sexual contact between men.
You have not seen me put anyone down. Sexual contact between men is homosexual contact. QED. I get your attempted distinction. Same ******* in my view; man penetrating man.No they aren't the
No they aren't the same.
Bi = wants sex with both sex
Gay = only wants to have sex with there same sex
Why is it that when woman have sex with men and woman this is bi and it is a good thing? Yet when a man has sex with men and woman is bad and gay? Let's be consistent here. Let's not be biphobic or homophonic here. You don't want to have sex with a guy, cool. Yet don't put down people who do.
If you call me gay because I have sex with men and woman, then you are putting me down. I would say you are classic homophob and Biphob. I would recommend you look into the Kinsey scale. He found very few fall on 0 or 6. Most people fall between 1 and 5. I'm a 2, this means I'm far from Gay even though I do have sex with men. Stop being a bigget!You have not seen me put anyone down. Sexual contact between men is homosexual contact. QED. I get your attempted distinction. Same ******* in my view; man penetrating man.
Somebody gave you a scale and tells you who you are. I do not need a scale to define myself as heterosexual, I know I am because I have not attraction to men and have no inclination to share my sexuality with men and that is valid and good and true. good dayIf you call me gay because I have sex with men and woman, then you are putting me down. I would say you are classic homophob and Biphob. I would recommend you look into the Kinsey scale. He found very few fall on 0 or 6. Most people fall between 1 and 5. I'm a 2, this means I'm far from Gay even though I do have sex with men. Stop being a bigget!
View attachment 7507327
Depending from the angle you see it. I would agree cucks are latent gay. Completely hetero Black bulls would normally reject the participation of other men in the same room flat out. Gangbangers who put their cock where another male has been seconds ago.... not so sure. My ex wife's bull would never do me, no matter how many times she would ask him for it. He rather instructed her to peg me. Only after months she had been feminising me and I looked passable, he would do it. But then, I technically was emasculated since both had finally done me real good. I was not "gay" anymore. He kept his integrity: never touched or looked at my clitty.Seems this lifestyle is full of closet cases on both sides. It is one of the reasons that a lot of people in the real world thinks a Black man who exclusively dates and sex white women are trying to hide their bisexuality or gayness. I’m starting to believe that there is truth to this theory.
It’s quite obvious that cucks are at the very least bi-curious or purely gay in an arrangement with their female partner.
Lastly, guys who love being part of gangbangs screams bi or closet gay to me.
Thoughts?
That's too another take. I couldn't put it better.... For me, a cuckold is closer to the woman than he is the Real man. Closer by way of sub feelings, sexual arousals, and that he posesses No sexual organs involved in the huge pleasure both She and the Bull experience. It is fascinating! And natural
Cucks yes are gay !! Bulls are not gay even if they do penetrate a submissive white boi or cuck as they are asserting their dominance over them, it’s not a sexual attraction for them but it def is a sexual attraction for the cuck
you're absolutely right. not sure why there's any confusion. men want nothing to do with another man sexually unless they're gay. it's cut and dryYou have not seen me put anyone down. Sexual contact between men is homosexual contact. QED. I get your attempted distinction. Same ******* in my view; man penetrating man.