Or spelling, for that matter. The subster has just suggested riding into town on the underground lair of a rodent.
gidee-yup thar bunny! Yee Haw!
if I want any ******* out of you I will tip your head and dip it out!
Having read that Donald Trump thread
- Thread starter B Brown
- Start date
if I want any ******* out of you I will tip your head and dip it out!
what....HH prove you the fool!....so you come here with more nonesense
I don't know what makes you so stupid, but it really works.
nanci whiteboy
Male
nanci whiteboy said:
Actually, it's a pretty accurate image. He'll like it.
subster hubster, the internet warrior -- charging into cyber battle on his galumphing gopher -- slinging feverishly copied links of death at his enemies -- and waving his gopher-boy hat like Slim Pickens riding the bomb down.
Last edited:
nanci whiteboy
Male
Actually, it's a pretty accurate image. He'll like it.
subster hubster, the internet warrior -- charging into cyber battle on his galumphing gopher -- slinging feverishly copied links of death at his enemies -- and waving his gopher-boy hat like Slim Pickens riding the bomb down.
nanci whiteboy
Male
Preface: I'm jumping in here, but not to defend Mac's position. I am quite sure he can handle that himself. These are my own concerns.
In that Mac and I arrived at an acceptable compromise, this then represents the hard Right's intransigence. The Right cannot negotiate into this position -- it can only be realized by political ******* -- and the exact same is true of the Left's unlimited abortion.
And the mayhem committed by highly at-risk youth will render poverty stricken communities into near war-zones. It has been demonstrated beyond any doubt that Accountability does not work. Look literally anywhere in the world where at-risk populations, lacking social investment, result in dangerous, failed systems, joblessness and despair.
The argument that ******* and childhood ******* (the Biden effect) can be treated differently due the heinousness of the acts, is a complete failure in arguing for limiting abortions. We cannot devalue the ******* pregnancy as undesirable and then tell Polly Poli-Sci Major that she may not abort her drunken hookup. It's either a Life or it is not.
The same trap catches the pro-abortion Left. They cannot righteously demand maternal and baby social investment, while leaving a third-trimester aborted baby to die on a stainless table.
By this I mean, the Pro Life/Abortion debate CANNOT be conducted on moral grounds. There is NO moral middle. We are ALL hypocrites. The only compromise possible comes from pragmatic political deal-making. As driven by the desire to reduce polarization and have functional government.
In that Mac and I arrived at an acceptable compromise, this then represents the hard Right's intransigence. The Right cannot negotiate into this position -- it can only be realized by political ******* -- and the exact same is true of the Left's unlimited abortion.
And the mayhem committed by highly at-risk youth will render poverty stricken communities into near war-zones. It has been demonstrated beyond any doubt that Accountability does not work. Look literally anywhere in the world where at-risk populations, lacking social investment, result in dangerous, failed systems, joblessness and despair.
The argument that ******* and childhood ******* (the Biden effect) can be treated differently due the heinousness of the acts, is a complete failure in arguing for limiting abortions. We cannot devalue the ******* pregnancy as undesirable and then tell Polly Poli-Sci Major that she may not abort her drunken hookup. It's either a Life or it is not.
The same trap catches the pro-abortion Left. They cannot righteously demand maternal and baby social investment, while leaving a third-trimester aborted baby to die on a stainless table.
By this I mean, the Pro Life/Abortion debate CANNOT be conducted on moral grounds. There is NO moral middle. We are ALL hypocrites. The only compromise possible comes from pragmatic political deal-making. As driven by the desire to reduce polarization and have functional government.
Last edited:
the first line of the thread...….and yet the trumptards jump right in telling you what is ……..
Having read that Donald Trump thread I've updated my profile, starting off by saying in bold:
DO NOT CONTACT ME IF YOU SUPPORT DONALD TRUMP. If we are already chatting and you support him and I never knew, please block "ignore" me by using the ignore button because I don't want to have anything to do with you going forward.
Getting laid isn't everything, and if you ask me it's not worth getting involved with anyone who would support someone as vile as Trump, not that I support the Democrats and whoever their current flavor of the day is either. Some things call for taking a firm stand, letting people know what you are about. If they don't like it, fine. They can go their merry way.
Like Reply
Report
guess a simple statement like that went way over their head.....so instead they have to show their ass.....which explains why most do not like trump supporters...….see anything on these 5 pages where they had an intelligent conversation about anything!
Having read that Donald Trump thread I've updated my profile, starting off by saying in bold:
DO NOT CONTACT ME IF YOU SUPPORT DONALD TRUMP. If we are already chatting and you support him and I never knew, please block "ignore" me by using the ignore button because I don't want to have anything to do with you going forward.
Getting laid isn't everything, and if you ask me it's not worth getting involved with anyone who would support someone as vile as Trump, not that I support the Democrats and whoever their current flavor of the day is either. Some things call for taking a firm stand, letting people know what you are about. If they don't like it, fine. They can go their merry way.
Like Reply
Report
guess a simple statement like that went way over their head.....so instead they have to show their ass.....which explains why most do not like trump supporters...….see anything on these 5 pages where they had an intelligent conversation about anything!
I disliked George Bush but I didn't hate him.
I like it...except I noticed you couldn't let it pass without throwing a couple of jabs to the right! LOL!
You and I know that there isn't a politician alive that wants to solve these "big ticket" issues. They are political leverage they can use every time an election comes around.
BUT - If we would all stop participating and fight our way out of that trick bag... I think we could all use some safe middle ground, right now.
Quit crying and calling people names, Ad hominem! LOL!
I don't call names......anymore than the others...….but I just call them like I see them...as for crying.....be a cold day in hell!......the worm ALWAYS makes a turn!
we could...….but there isn't any...….......(actually Gingrich and his contract with America started it)…...….it was going downhill BEFORE trump...……..he went ahead and kicked it off the cliff....take something drastic to wake people up and get back to taking care of the country instead of the party
That's because George W wasn't REALLY the President, Dick Chaney was! He was the one who would inform the President of what he NEEDED TO KNOW, remember? He started the Iraq was with WMD's, not George. Yes, I hated Chaney, and still do. I never thought, however, I could ever dislike anyone in politics as much, until Orange Man came along. Now, it isn't even close ... hands DOWN ... its Orange Man.
That Chaney (sic) sure was a clever SOB. Amazing how he brought in Doctor Who to take him back to December 1998 in order to convince ole Bubba Blow Jobs From Interns Clinton to bomb Iraq over their WMDs before George even ran for president. And here I thought all along that Clinton was just starting his little war to distract from his impending impeachment for perjury.
Military Strikes Against Iraq
President Clinton announced that he had ordered military strikes against targets within Iraq in order to degrade Iraq's ability to build weapons of mass destruction. He reviewed numerous violations of United Nations Resolutions by Iraq noting that they had been given several chances to comply...
Amazing, isn't it when a perjury charge is a more powerful impeachment incentive than fraternizing with the enemy, sharing highly classified info with the enemy, taking sides with the enemy against his own intelligents info, obstruction justice, etc. Only reason the Orange man didn't have a perjury charge as well, is because he wouldn't allow himself to testify under oath. It wasn't like he didn't want to ... his lawyers just a bit "smarter" than the Orange Man, though, as they knew what a chronic liar he is.
As far as the WMDs, Clinton was referencing chemical weapons, which did exist and were being used on the citizens of Iraq. Not one word reference to nuclear weapons, however. BUT, Old Georgie Boy was much more expansive in his definition of WMD. Recall his 9-14, 2020 radio announcement that Iraq "now had scientists & infrastructure for a nuclear weapons program, was seeking enriched uranium for nuclear weapons, and if allowed to progress, would HAVE nuclear weapons within the year" ... unquote. You recall that, right? And who do you suppose provided him that false information? Come on now ... starts with C and ends in Y ... and lets not forget Donald Rumsfeld's part in all that. He and Cheney were "butthole buddies" ... remember? Wonder what's happened to those guys ... haven't heard from them in a few years. I know they took Tony Blair down with Bush on all the WMD bullshit. Gotta love those lying Republicans. If there's no evidence, no problem, just manufacture a big LIE, then tell everyone "Trust ME!" ... right?
Give me a break!
Jesus fucking christ Mac....I guess I should forgive you.....ole Bubba Clinton didn't mention nuclear until......wayyyy into the THIRD SENTENCE of the speech. That's clearly too far in for you to still be paying attention.
Bubba actually mentioned nuclear before he mentioned chemical... "Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors."
And he mentioned them again...."Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons."
And again....."Iraq would be free to retain and begin to rebuild its chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs in months, not years."
Transcript from your buddies at the Clinton News Network...
Well, no....I admit I have trouble recalling things that won't happen until 7 months from now. Thanks for the heads up... Will be sure to tune in....
Were you riding in the Tardis with Cheney when you heard this????
Last edited:
nukes never came into mention......it was always the gas...…….Powell went in front of the UN and convinced the world that our republican party was not to be trusted...….see powell having anything more to do with the right......once a highly respected general
See, this is exactly WHY you're a waste to have any conversation with. YOU KNOW the year, so I accidentally typed in an extra "2" big fucking deal ... at least to YOU it is. Such an insignificant error compared to the rest of the post ... again, when you gonna start checking my spelling, fool?
You know I can't resist ....
.....................................................
PS ... have you found a job yet? They say there are plenty of unfilled jobs out there now, even for washed up old guys like you. Don't give up!
And your post is a prime example of you doing exactly what you so often whine about others doing. You're picking on a minor point made at the end of my post while ignoring the 3/4 of my post which focused on yet another documented lie from you.
I actually stuck that joke about your date blunder at the end just knowing you'd likely comment on that and ignore the substance of my post....i.e. your BullShit claim that in Clinton's speech:
....when in fact Bubba actually speaks of Iraq's nuclear weapon program BEFORE he talked about chemical weapons and went on to mention nuclear weapons multiple additional times in the speech.
Good ole double standards MacnLies sure didn't let me down! You didn't want to address the fact you obviously didn't even attempt to listen to what Bubba said. Instead you just pulled a BS claim out of your ass and threw it out as if it were true.
Of course there's plenty of your fellow BubbleHeads on here that will lap your lie up and believe it.....despite the fact they could listen to Clinton say nuclear himself in just the 3rd sentence of the speech.
kind of like the bubbleheads did with trump?
major difference....Dems have facts and listen to the news...……..and...…..don't live in a cult cave....awaiting the next glass of kool Aid.....or prerecorded message to answer any talking points that might arise...…….kind of like comparing humans...…..to zombies.....but then with trump not only being a fucking crook...….is also a blooming fucking idiot...….notice his orange color...….so naturally he would draw like minded individuals
