I mean like the very first paragraph of your source perfectly lays out my argument. And you found it! You found a great source that argues exactly what I was saying. Thank you
@cpl2010co , that was thoughtful of you.
Bahahahahaha
"Analysis of the resulting comprehensive News21 election fraud database turned up 10 cases of voter impersonation. With 146 million registered voters in the United States during that time, those 10 cases represent one out of about every 15 million prospective voters."
10 votes! Lmao
1) In-person fraud (the thing that voter ID would stop) is super rare.
From your source!
"A News21 analysis of 2,068 alleged election-fraud cases since 2000 shows that while fraud has occurred, the rate is infinitesimal, and in-person voter impersonation on Election Day, which prompted 37 state legislatures to enact or consider tough voter ID laws, is virtually non-existent."
2) Election fraud is pretty rare overall -- 2600 cases over 12 years!
Which is bigger, 14k "insignificant" voters, or 2600 votes over 12 years?
Hmmmmmmmmm
1st
The argument was voter fraud.
You asserted no voter fraud.
This source you, wrongly think makes your argument still, proves voter fraud in the exact way you jumped into this argument saying didn't happen and it show that fraud is much more prevalent. Why do you think I posted it. I knew you bite.
So again you stated it multiple times, agreed with it, and now I have given you sourced voter fraud is real. Now you have no place to hide. You have stated it and now quoted my source and your quotes says there are 2068 case of fraud in that data set. And you bragged about it. Oops.
2nd
You asserted Minorities are overly impacted by voter ID laws and they are not.
And your sources proved there is no significant number. And your sourced proved your assertions wrong
And your source added and noted a third remedy for a voter who has no ID to vote, including on election day.
So again you stated significant impact and 14k by any logical standard is not significant in a population of 8.9 million. Also the impact is not disproportionate to minorities when 57% of the people who had to use the affidavit were white.
And in the end all 14 K were allowed to vote and all 14k still have 3 main types of Remedies to fix the ID issue including free State IDs to vote.
Bottomline your whole strawman argument has failed
And you are still running form my questions.