Wake Up, America! Wake Up! PLEASE!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
well guess I see where he got his brainstorm....or sillyassed coment

this is crazy...what to do if a bank robbed?......call a social worker?

Cities Ask if It’s Time to Defund Police and ‘Reimagine’ Public Safety

After more than a week of protests against police ******* and unrest that left parts of the city burned, a growing chorus of elected officials, civic leaders and residents in Minneapolis are urging the city to break up the Police Department and reimagine the way policing works.

“We are going to dismantle the Minneapolis Police Department,” Jeremiah Ellison, a member of the City Council, said on Twitter this week. “And when we’re done, we’re not simply gonna glue it back together,” he added. “We are going to dramatically rethink how we approach public safety and emergency response.”

At least three others, including the City Council president, Lisa Bender, have also called for taking the Police Department apart.

Minneapolis is not the only city asking the question. Across the country, calls to defund, downsize or abolish police departments are gaining new traction after national unrest following the death of George Floyd, a black man who died after a white police officer pressed a knee into his neck for nearly nine minutes on a busy Minneapolis street.

On Wednesday, Mayor Eric Garcetti of Los Angeles announced that he would cut as much as $150 million from a planned increase in the Police Department’s budget. And in New York, Corey Johnson, the City Council speaker, and Daniel Dromm, a council member from Queens, vowed even before the latest protests to cut the Police Department’s $6 billion budget, which they noted had been left almost untouched even as education and youth programs faced steep cuts.

The calls to redirect money away from the police come as cities face steep budget shortfalls because of the economic fallout from the coronavirus, and as public anger against police ******* has roiled the country. Redirecting funding is one of the few levers that elected officials have over the police, who are frequently shielded by powerful unions and labor arbitrators who reinstate officers fired for misconduct.

Mr. Dromm, chair of the city’s finance committee, said that in order to restore some funding to youth programs he was considering a delay in the next class of police cadets and scrutinizing the $700 million in police overtime that has been budgeted for this year. He said the events of recent days — including police officers’ treatment of peaceful protesters — have shown that years of efforts to reform the department have not succeeded.

“The culture in the New York City Police Department has not changed,” he said. “The white shirts, the commanding officers, they kind of get it and talk the talk, but the average beat cop doesn’t believe in it and we’ve seen this over and over again.”

In Minneapolis, calls to dismantle the police are likely to further demoralize a ******* that already is reeling from the killing of Mr. Floyd, the criminal charges filed against four former officers, looting in the city and the burning of a police precinct.

“That’s not the answer,” said Gwen Gunter, a retired lieutenant of the Minneapolis Police Department who is also a member of a black police officers’ association.

There’s a part of me that hopes they do succeed,” she said, “because I want to see how long it takes before they say, ‘Oh, no we do need a Police Department.’”
The Minneapolis police chief, Medaria Arradondo, on Friday pledged to “continue to work on efforts to improve public trust, public safety and transformational culture change of the M.P.D.” His statement did not address the recent calls to dismantle the department.

Those who support the movement to scale back the responsibilities of the police say officers frequently abuse their power and instigate violence rather than prevent it. They say many social welfare tasks that currently fall to armed police officers — responding to ******* overdoses, and working with people who have a mental illness or are homeless — would be better carried out by nurses or social workers

One model that members of the Minneapolis City Council cite is Cahoots, a nonprofit mobile crisis intervention program that has handled mental health calls in Eugene, Ore., since 1989. Cahoots employees responded to more than 24,000 calls for service last year — about 20 percent of the area’s 911 calls — on a budget of about $2 million, probably far less than what it would cost the Police Department to do the work, said Tim Black, the program’s operations coordinator.

“There’s a strong argument to be made from a fiscally conservative perspective,” Mr. Black said. “Public safety institutions generally have these massive budgets and there’s questions about what they are doing.”

But handing over one aspect of police work is not a panacea. Eugene has had at least two officers shoot people in the past year.

Last year, after a campaign by a group called Durham Beyond Policing, the City Council in Durham, N.C., voted against hiring 18 new police officers and began discussing a “community safety and wellness task *******” instead.

Minneapolis took a step in that direction last year when it redirected funding for eight new police officers into a new office for violence prevention.

“We have an opportunity to reimagine what the future of public safety looks like,” said Steve Fletcher, a City Council member who pushed that effort. But he acknowledged that the effort to build a viable alternative to the police on social and mental health issues would take years and that no one could be sure what it would look like in the end.

“It’s very easy as an activist to call for the abolishment of the police,” said Mr. Fletcher, himself a former activist who protested a 2015 police shooting. “It is a heavier decision when you realize that it’s your constituents that are going to be the victims of crime you can’t respond to if you dismantle that without an alternative.”

Black activists in the city have been calling for the police to be dismantled for years, issuing a report in 2018 that argued that the oppression of poor people and black people was baked into the very founding of the department in 1867. Police reform has roiled politics in the city for years, and politicians who have been seen as slow to reform have been defeated. But only recently have calls to dismantle the police been widely embraced by white leaders in the city.

In Linden Hills, a predominantly white Minneapolis neighborhood near a golf course and two lakes that has not seen very many of the overly aggressive police tactics that the city’s black residents complain about, residents acknowledge that the department needs to be significantly reformed. But they have been leery of pledges to abolish the police.

“What does that even mean?” asked Steve Birch, the chair of the Linden Hills Neighborhood Council. “Then who provides the public service of policing? I don’t even know how to answer that.”

But in Kingfield, a neighborhood in South Minneapolis not far from where Mr. Floyd died, Chris DesRoches, the president of the neighborhood association, said he supported defunding the department.

“The killing of George Floyd has opened the eyes of people to the worst case scenario of police,” he said, adding that the case has created an opportunity “for white people to start hearing what communities of color and community leaders have been saying all along, which is that the police are an organization which has been actively harmful to our communities.”

Mayor Jacob Frey has said he does not support calls to dismantle the department. On Friday, City Council members voted to accept a civil rights investigation by the Minnesota Department of Human Rights and to adopt updates to the Police Department’s use of ******* policy that include a ban on chokeholds. The topic of eliminating some of the department’s functions was not discussed.

Still, council members acknowledged during their debate that something had changed fundamentally in the way that city residents view the police. The University of Minnesota, as well as the school board and the parks department in Minneapolis, decided in recent days to cut ties with the Police Department.

Many in Minneapolis have said that Mr. Floyd’s death provided a stark illustration of how far efforts to institute reforms in the wake of the 2015 police shooting of Jamar Clark, a 24-year-old African-American man, had fallen short.

After that shooting, police officers received implicit bias training and body cameras. The department appointed its first black police chief. Community policing was emphasized. Policies were rewritten to include a “duty to intervene” if an officer saw a colleague endangering a member of the public — a policy that was key to the swift firing and arrest of the four officers involved in Mr. Floyd’s death.

But none of those reforms were sufficient to prevent Mr. Floyd’s death.

The fact that none of the officers took the initiative to follow the policy to intervene, it just became really clear to me that this system wasn’t going to work, no matter how much we threw at it,” said Alondra Cano, who heads the City Council’s public safety committee.
Ms. Cano, who says she was part of a “prosecute the police” campaign while she was a college student, acknowledged that it might take years to build viable alternatives. But she said many city residents, some of whom have formed mutual protection neighborhood groups in the wake of the unrest, are ready to try.

There’s a moment of deep commitment that I’ve never seen before, and that gives me leave as an elected official to start experimenting with other systems,” she said.
Matt Furber and Eric Killelea contributed reporting
 
EVERY AMERICAN NO MATTER RACE, COLOR, CREED OR POLITICAL PERSUASIONS SHOULD READ, OBSERVE & COMPREHEND EVERY WORD AND PICTURE IN THE BELOW ARTICLE! IF AFTER YOU'VE DONE SO & YOU CAN STILL LOOK IN A MIRROR AND SAY "TRUMP" IS RIGHT ....SORRY BUT;
A/. EITHER YOU'RE A LIAR & DIDN'T READ A WORD OF IT
B/. YOU'RE AN IDIOT AND COULDN'T COMPREHEND A SINGLE WORD OF WHAT YOU READ
C/. YOU REALLY DON'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT THE CURRENT OR FUTURE OF THE UNITED STATES .... WITHIN YOUR COUNTRY OR THE WORLD
D/. YOU'RE A WILLINGLY VICTIM OF THE "TRUMPIAN HYPOCRITICAL TRANCE"

""WAKE UP AMERICA! WAKE UP! PLEASE!!""


 
Last edited:
Is this a big idea? I'm surprised it took a member of congress so long to figure this out. But there's no way a professional politician will accept term limits.
Oh they didn't just "figure this out". Term limits have been proposed plenty of times. We came damn close to passing Congressional term limits back in the 90s. 12 year term limits for congress was part of the Republican Contract With America. Republicans brought it to a vote just as they promised. Guess why it failed.....the Democrat Party of NO. 83% of republicans voted for it. 81% of democrats voted NO. Since it would have been an amendment, it required 2/3 majority...therefore failing due to the Democrats blocking it.

 
and yet unemployment is still at 13.8 percent and black unemployment is at 16.8 percent, the stupidity among Trump supporters is astounding and he counts on that stupidity.
I didn't say unemployment wasn't still high. That whooosh you heard was the point flying over your head that we've had a dramatic U-turn in the direction the experts and analyst thought the unemployment rate was going. We were at 14.7% unemployment and the prediction was the new number yesterday would put us at 19.7%. Instead unemployment dropped to 13.8%.

 
3 things buddy:
1. You are NOT for mail in voting. So the comment is germane-ish.
2. Nobody knows what the hell you're talking about half the time.

Ed - I don’t ever recall taking a stand on mail in voting - truly. Don’t really know enough about it to comment though I have heard some people think it’s a good way to cheat - I don’t really know.

I think I make myself VERY clear in here - and will take responsibility for anything I post - which apparently you will not.

Where is point 3 ????
 
Last edited:


don't care about your article..or SOURCE?.....really doubt that....Clintons have done a lot for minorities.....but I'm sure if there was some way of twisting the conversation....the right could do it...………………………..the right likes to put out and believe their own agenda…..

talking to my right wing crazy republican neighbor yesterday....guy is just plain nuts...buys anything fox sells and listens to a few others...………….……...anyway he could not understand all this rioting...the guy was a criminal and had ******* in his system so no one knows for sure what happened.....he started off on his spiel I had to walk away...my other neighbor had just come over and started talking to him...he is big Democrat and retired union so I'm sure it was an interesting conversation...normally since he is so far out there we have an agreement we don't talk politics...……….but he just couldn't understand the riots and why more wasn't being done to stop...naturally he is a solid trumptard!
 
Oh they didn't just "figure this out". Term limits have been proposed plenty of times. We came damn close to passing Congressional term limits back in the 90s. 12 year term limits for congress was part of the Republican Contract With America. Republicans brought it to a vote just as they promised. Guess why it failed.....the Democrat Party of NO. 83% of republicans voted for it. 81% of democrats voted NO. Since it would have been an amendment, it required 2/3 majority...therefore failing due to the Democrats blocking it.




you have mentioned this same statement several times.....and have been shown each time you are so full of *******.....but you crazy right wingers have your own facts...no matter how the rest of the world sees it


now in your usual fashion....you are going to take an excerpt out and offer it as proof.....and fail to mention all the rest of the parts of that bill it was attached to...….pretty safe bet it wouldn't pass to begin with.....and you failed to mention the amount of people in your own party that would not accept it....and that was a major part of why Gingrich was voted out!

but you would never mention all the facts...it never suits your statements....kind of like the sky was falling and the right stopped it?
 
I didn't say unemployment wasn't still high. That whooosh you heard was the point flying over your head that we've had a dramatic U-turn in the direction the experts and analyst thought the unemployment rate was going. We were at 14.7% unemployment and the prediction was the new number yesterday would put us at 19.7%. Instead unemployment dropped to 13.8%.




that whoosh you heard was the vacuum in your head trying to engage the same thought twice.....twisting your story again...originally you were bragging about the economy...but when pointed out still not good and still not going to save your hero....you change your story again....and try to deflect ******* with your little whooshes and *******......not working most have seen your conversations before....and your diversions away from your original dumb remark!\

have a nice day pal.....and you are still 0fer in winning any arguments or posting facts!
 
don't care about your article..or SOURCE?.....really doubt that....Clintons have done a lot for minorities.....but I'm sure if there was some way of twisting the conversation....the right could do it...………………………..the right likes to put out and believe their own agenda…..

talking to my right wing crazy republican neighbor yesterday....guy is just plain nuts...buys anything fox sells and listens to a few others...………….……...anyway he could not understand all this rioting...the guy was a criminal and had ******* in his system so no one knows for sure what happened.....he started off on his spiel I had to walk away...my other neighbor had just come over and started talking to him...he is big Democrat and retired union so I'm sure it was an interesting conversation...normally since he is so far out there we have an agreement we don't talk politics...……….but he just couldn't understand the riots and why more wasn't being done to stop...naturally he is a solid trumptard!

That crime bill needs to be dismantled
 
you have mentioned this same statement several times.....and have been shown each time you are so full of *******.....but you crazy right wingers have your own facts...no matter how the rest of the world sees it
The bill and the vote totals are here....So sorry the facts don't support you.

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/1995/roll277.xml


and you failed to mention the amount of people in your own party that would not accept it
I told you the level of Republican party support....83% voted FOR term limits. I didn't realize you'd require such hand holding....I know this is fancy math, but that means a mere 17% of Republicans voted against it. The vote totals are right in that link...reading comprehension troubles again? Are your math skills slipping to Macian levels?
 
The bill and the vote totals are here....So sorry the facts don't support you.

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/1995/roll277.xml



I told you the level of Republican party support....83% voted FOR term limits. I didn't realize you'd require such hand holding....I know this is fancy math, but that means a mere 17% of Republicans voted against it. The vote totals are right in that link...reading comprehension troubles again? Are your math skills slipping to Macian levels?


this is the third time you have tried to make your crazy statement and pass it off as fact...…..nitpicking the facts actually
but again as you are a little on the dense side when it comes to all the facts...….what all was in the bill that people to include republicans would not support.....and what happened to the guy pushing it shortly after.....your twisted version of the events is amazing...….to bad they are NOT reality



show what all was in the bill and why most would NOT support it

matter of fact term limits have been brought up several times...and killed by the right...….and was brought up once by a Dem and Mcconnell would not even bring up for a vote...….you failed to mention that

Disgusting: GOP Leaders Killing Ted Cruz's Term Limit Bill ...
https://conservative-daily.com/2019/04/10/disgusting-gop-leaders-killing-ted-cruzs...
That is pretty much the only thing that Republicans and Democrats agree on right now. The only people who seem to oppose term limits are the entrenched career politicians who have made their fortunes "serving" the American people. This bill would change that for good and return the United States to the service model that the Founders intended.

and this from the 1997 house leader...a republican who fought to ******* the bill


Term Limits Fail Again in the House
February 13, 1997
The House defeated a constitutional amendment that would have established a 12-year limit to House or Senate service.

"We should have faith in the voters to do the right thing," said House Majority Whip Tom DeLay (R-Tex.), a term limits opponent who is in his seventh term.


On Term-Limits Amendment, Republican Divisions Are Widening
November 30, 1994
Congressional Republicans displayed a widening division over a proposed constitutional amendment to limit the terms of lawmaker
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top