Wake Up, America! Wake Up! PLEASE!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
and thanks to Donald Musowienie…..for his attention to health care....after he let this virus in...and people with no healthcare......that check may not cover hospital bills...….you know those grubby little republicans are going to try and get their hands on it...give you 1200 dollars....charge you 1300 to stay alive under trump

How US medical bills compare with those in other countries

The coronavirus pandemic has thrust the shortcomings of America’s health care system into the spotlight once again. The United States has one of the costliest health care systems in the world, and it is home to an estimated 27.5 million people who do not have health insurance. Even for those Americans with coverage, the out-of-pocket cost of treating the virus could exceed $1,300, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation study.

Average out-of-pocket medical expenses can be a telling measure of the efficacy of a health care system. According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, an international organization of 36 member states working toward improved global prosperity, higher out-of-pocket costs have been shown to translate to worse health outcomes. Out-of-pocket costs cover everything paid for directly by the individual, including prescription ******* and doctor’s visit copays as well as health insurance deductibles and medical goods for personal use.

Using health spending data from the OECD, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed per capita out-of-pocket health care spending in the 20 most populous OECD member states to determine how Americans’ medical bills compare to other countries.

High out-of-pocket medical costs can deter someone with a medical problem from seeking treatment. This may partially explain why countries with high average out-of-pocket costs also often have worse outcomes. In the United States, for instance, the country with the highest out-of-pocket spending on this list, average life expectancy at birth is 78.6 years, lower than in the vast majority of countries on this list. Here is a look at the countries where people live the longest.

Medical care costs shouldered by patients in the U.S. are representative of the high overall costs across the health care system. When considering all forms of medical spending, including government and private industry, the U.S. spends far more per capita than every other OECD nation. This is due in large part to higher prescription ******* and administrative costs. Here is a look at the countries spending the most on public health.


 
Says U - I never said anything about his crap country anytime anyplace - I take responsibility for my actions - not the actions of others - herd mentality is a lefty trait.
 
and talk about being a petty little sob...….now we know why his followers are so petty....snakes travel together....makes you wonder how the right could move from a touch of class...to a big ASS


Trump’s sarcastic response to Mitt Romney’s negative test for coronavirus follows years of bad *******

For a famously mild-mannered man whose worst cuss words are G-rated throwbacks like “golly,” Mitt Romney has a way of getting under President Trump’s skin.

This time, the Utah Republican senator did it by announcing a bit of good news amid the welter of scary developments during the pandemic: He has tested negative for the coronavirus.

“This is really great news! I am so happy I can barely speak,” Trump tweeted Wednesday morning. “He may have been a terrible presidential candidate and an even worse U.S. Senator, but he is a RINO, and I like him a lot!”


For a famously mild-mannered man whose worst cuss words are G-rated throwbacks like “golly,” Mitt Romney has a way of getting under President Trump’s skin.

This time, the Utah Republican senator did it by announcing a bit of good news amid the welter of scary developments during the pandemic: He has tested negative for the coronavirus.

“This is really great news! I am so happy I can barely speak,” Trump tweeted Wednesday morning. “He may have been a terrible presidential candidate and an even worse U.S. Senator, but he is a RINO, and I like him a lot!”
 
It’s nice you defend a Brit attacking our country you unpatriotic sumbitch - shoulda expected no less - Dems NEVER cease to amaze me.
this is an international board....everyone has an opinion.....because you don't like it....want to complain...…..maybe they didn't like trump butting in over there....the door has been opened....all have opinions....and the right to speak them

trump has secret meetings with Russia and they praise each other ,,,,,and you say nothing....an allie says something and you complain
 
Maybe a new name for him....the Killer N Thief.....doing both now...…...of course won't change his legacy any...already down as a loser and worst president in history




6 ways the Trump administration has botched the ...
https://www.businessinsider.com/6-ways-the-trump-administration-has-botched-the...
As the coronavirus spreads across the globe, the Trump administration has hampered the United States' response through blunders and cuts to public health.

Here Are 17 Ways the Trump Administration Bungled Its ...
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/03/here-are-17-ways-the-trump-administration...
Mar 03, 2020 · Here Are 17 Ways the Trump Administration Bungled Its Coronavirus Response This list doesn’t include Donald Trump Jr.’s claim that Democrats wanted the virus to spread and ******* Americans.

Trump Bears Full Responsibility for Botched Response to ...
trump-bears-full-responsibility-for-botched-response-to...
Mar 09, 2020 · Trump Bears Full Responsibility for Botched Response to Coronavirus in US Donald Trump and CDC Director Robert Redfield walk through a laboratory during a tour of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia, on March 6, 2020.






Trump’s Most Faithful Don’t Really Care If He Botched The Coronavirus Response
reddit.com/r/politics · Mar 20, 2020 · Article from: www.huffpost.com
 
U.S. Lags in Coronavirus Testing After Slow Response to ...
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/03/17/us/coronavirus-testing-data.html
Mar 17, 2020 · U.S. Lags in Coronavirus Testing After Slow Response to Outbreak - The New York Times It has tested at a much lower rate than Italy, which …

Here's why the US is behind in coronavirus testing ...
https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/21/politics/us-coronavirus-tests-invs/index.html
4 days ago · As the US has lagged behind other advanced nations in testing for the coronavirus, former government officials and public health experts point to a …
 
Could Trump's Stimulus Check Exclude Social Security Beneficiaries?

A roughly $1 trillion fiscal stimulus package may leave some seniors on the outside looking in.

We are witnessing something truly unprecedented when it comes to combatting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) both within the U.S. and around the globe.


Through Friday, March 20, this lung-focused illness had been confirmed in over 272,000 people worldwide, and directly led to the death of around 11,300 people, according to Johns Hopkins University. The rate of new cases has been growing so aggressively outside of mainland China for more than a month that a number of countries, including the United States, were ******* to take serious mitigating actions to stem the spread of COVID-19.

Within the U.S., we've witnessed varying degrees of response, ranging from suggested social distancing to the mandated closure of all nonessential businesses throughout California and New York. These actions are being taken to save lives and ensure our healthcare system doesn't become overwhelmed. However, it's going to come at a steep cost.


Halting most economic activity for weeks, or perhaps even longer than a month, is going to do considerable harm to American's pocketbooks, and it certainly threatens to put countless small businesses and highly levered companies out of business. That's what makes a massive fiscal stimulus package all the more necessary from the President Trump and his administration.


But what you might be surprised to learn is that it isn't a guarantee that Social Security's 64 million beneficiaries will receive a Trump stimulus check.


No joke: Social Security beneficiaries aren't guaranteed to receive a stimulus check

As of March 20, discussion surrounding a roughly $1 trillion fiscal stimulus package were still fairly fluid. However, a proposal from the Republican-led Senate was gaining steam. Here are the basic details of what the Trump stimulus might entail, as well as who it would apply to:

  • Individual taxpayers would be eligible to receive a one-time payment of up to $1,200, with couples filing jointly receiving up to $2,400.
  • The Trump stimulus check is based on income, with a phase-out beginning at $75,000 in income for individuals and $150,000 in income for couples filing jointly. For individuals, this one-time payout declines by $5 for every $100 over $75,000. Individuals earning more than $99,000 annually, or couples filing jointly above $198,000, would not receive a stimulus check.
  • Payouts reduce to $600 per individual or $1,200 per couple in cases where there is little or no income-tax liability, but at least $2,500 in qualifying income.

The concern for Social Security beneficiaries ties into the language of the proposal. As of now, Social Security payments would act as qualifying income, and therefore allow retired workers the opportunity to receive a Trump stimulus check. But this may not be the case if the proposal's language is changed.

Furthermore, Social Security beneficiaries who receive less than the federal taxable amounts of $25,000 for an individual or $32,000 for a couple may not have filed a federal tax return in 2018 – 2018 being the federal tax year used to determine stimulus eligibility. Beneficiaries who are essentially reliant on Social Security for all of their income and didn't file a tax return may not have any qualifying income, and therefore wouldn't receive a Trump stimulus check. Or to put this in another context, some of the lowest-income Social Security recipients may not receive a dime.


Obviously, there's a lot still a lot to be decided, and it's quite possible the Democrat-controlled House will want tweaks to the Senate's proposal. But as things stand now, it's not a guarantee that every Social Security beneficiary is going to get a Trump stimulus check.

This is the bigger worry for Social Security recipients

As disheartening as it might sound that not every senior may qualify for the stimulus package, there's a far bigger worry looming.

As noted, mitigation measures to flatten the curve and minimize the spread of COVID-19 are a necessary evil. Unfortunately they're going to do exceptional harm to the Social Security program. That's because the 12.4% payroll tax on earned income is the primary funding mechanism. In 2018, the payroll tax was responsible for $885 billion of the just over $1 trillion collected by Social Security, with the remaining $118 billion coming from a combination of interest income and the taxation of benefits. If economic activity effectively grinds to a halt, Social Security is going to see a significant drop-off in revenue collection and will almost certainly turn in its largest annual net-cash outflow in history.


In the very near-term, this won't have any impact on existing retired workers or those about to begin taking their payouts. But there's a very real possibility that this economic shock is going to lessen the time frame before Social Security's asset reserves -- i.e., its net-cash surpluses built up since inception -- are completely exhausted. Right now, the Social Security Board of Trustees is calling for the program's asset reserves to be gone by 2035, but it could wind up being much sooner as a result of the coronavirus.


Although Social Security can't go bankrupt, a lack of asset reserves would ******* the program to cut benefits on retired workers by as much as 23%. Missing out on up to a $1,200 stimulus check would be a bummer, but that pales in comparison to a potential lifetime benefit reduction of 23% if Congress doesn't act soon.




all the more reason the country owes Reagan and Bush a big GFY!
 
Maybe a new name for him....the Killer N Thief.....doing both now...…...of course won't change his legacy any...already down as a loser and worst president in history




6 ways the Trump administration has botched the ...
https://www.businessinsider.com/6-ways-the-trump-administration-has-botched-the...
As the coronavirus spreads across the globe, the Trump administration has hampered the United States' response through blunders and cuts to public health.

Here Are 17 Ways the Trump Administration Bungled Its ...
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/03/here-are-17-ways-the-trump-administration...
Mar 03, 2020 · Here Are 17 Ways the Trump Administration Bungled Its Coronavirus Response This list doesn’t include Donald Trump Jr.’s claim that Democrats wanted the virus to spread and ******* Americans.

Trump Bears Full Responsibility for Botched Response to ...
trump-bears-full-responsibility-for-botched-response-to...
Mar 09, 2020 · Trump Bears Full Responsibility for Botched Response to Coronavirus in US Donald Trump and CDC Director Robert Redfield walk through a laboratory during a tour of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia, on March 6, 2020.






Trump’s Most Faithful Don’t Really Care If He Botched The Coronavirus Response
reddit.com/r/politics · Mar 20, 2020 · Article from: www.huffpost.com

60% approval rating according to Gallup’s latest regarding his handling of this pandemic.
 
60% approval rating according to Gallup’s latest regarding his handling of this pandemic.


Think we have gone through this same thing the past few days....you are dreaming....never happen....even trump was worried to night....he know the stock market down...…..economy in the dumps...…...and he is at fault for this virus...….not good for his re-election...and he knows it!
 
It’s nice you defend a Brit attacking our country you unpatriotic sumbitch - shoulda expected no less - Dems NEVER cease to amaze me.



and my last comment on your crazy rants...…..it has NOTHING to do with a brit practicing free speech...…...and everything to do with him being against your hero

he is entitled to his opinion same as everyone else on here....do you know this board is actually owned by someone in Ukraine?....anyway he has his right.....you just didn't like what he said...…..protective of your false god.....and YOU KNOW THAT TO BE TRUE
 
Last edited:
just more of America and it's workers bailing out big corporations for their poor managment


Congress to bail out firms that avoided taxes, safety regulations and spent billions boosting their stock


When airline executives realized a few years ago that they could charge passengers extra fees for just about anything — meals, checking bags, even choosing seats — their businesses seemed bulletproof.

“I don’t think we’re ever going to lose money again,” American Airlines chief executive Doug Parker told giddy investors in 2017. As such companies continued to thrive, they also undertook share buybacks, boosting investor value. President Trump and congressional Republicans sweetened the outlook for big businesses further when they passed a $1.5 trillion tax cut that slashed the corporate rate beginning in 2018.

That seems so long ago. Now airlines, hotels, cruise lines, coal-mining companies and others strangled by coronavirus shutdowns are lining up to receive slices of a $2 trillion aid package funded by taxpayers.

Yet many of these companies behaved in ways before the current economic crisis that are making a bailout tough to swallow, labor advocates and some economists say.

The hotel giant Hilton, for instance, announced a $2 billion stock buyback on March 3, weeks after coronavirus cases began affecting the industry. Cruise lines for years have avoided taxes and U.S. safety regulations by registering their vessels abroad. Coal companies put some of their workers in harms way and are now asking to get out of tax that generates money to compensate former miners who have black lung disease.

As Congress debated the details of the bailout this week, lawmakers wrestled with how far Congress should go to help another set of American corporate titans two years after tax reform and less than a dozen years after the bank and auto industry bailouts of the Great Recession.

The choice is between two options unsavory to many: bail out some of the country’s largest corporations or watch as they put more people out of work.

Among those seeking assistance from a pot of at least $500 billion in the rescue package are companies employing hundreds of thousands of servers, flight attendants, housekeepers, janitors, security guards and other workers. With unemployment already expected to reach as high as 20 percent this year, no one wants to see so many people lose their jobs.

“You don’t want to reward companies for doing shortsighted, short-term things the past 11 years. You don’t want to reward them for stock buybacks and excessive CEO compensation,” said Greg LeRoy, executive director of Good Jobs First, an advocacy groups that tracks corporate subsidies. “The trouble is a lot of the companies that are in trouble right now are the ones that have been doing that.”

Indeed writing checks to some of the companies in need of help may require some Americans to swallow hard and look away.


Airlines and hotel chains have in recent years dramatically increased spending on stock buybacks (which can pump up a share price without building anything or hiring anyone) and sometimes generous dividends (payments to shareholders).

Trump addressed such concerns Monday.

“I don’t want to give a bailout to a company and then have somebody go out and use that money to buy back stock in the company and raise the price and then get a bonus,” Trump said. “So I may be Republican, but I don’t like that. I want them to use the money for the workers.”

Cruise lines are also facing potential cash shortages, but they are domiciled in Liberia, Panama and elsewhere to avoid nearly all U.S. taxes and safety regulations. Some health officials say some cruise operators should have done more to stem transmission of the virus among passengers and crew members aboard their ships.

Coal-mining companies also have asked for help, including a request that the government rescind a $220 million tax increase to support 25,700 disabled coal miners and their dependents, many of whom have suffered from black lung disease. The industry employs about 51,000 miners in surface and underground mines, federal data shows

You’ve probably heard the critics by now. How dare the coal industry ask for relief to weather the covid-19 crisis?” the National Mining Association said Monday. “It’s the kind of absurd question or assertion we’ve come to expect from people who simply don’t value coal jobs like others and who remain completely out of touch with the essential role that coal plays in keeping the lights on, homes warm and industry churning.”

Even Boeing, the aerospace manufacturer that is accused of misleading pilots and federal safety inspectors about lapses that led to two of its 737 Max jets to crash (killing 346 people), is poised to receive a portion of a $17 billion loan program designated for businesses deemed “critical to maintaining national security.”

With its 737 Max jets still grounded and the novel coronavirus spreading among some of its own workers, Boeing may have to declare bankruptcy if it does not receive a bailout, some analysts said. Critics of the company noted that even if it goes in to bankruptcy, the company could continue operating and paying employees, as airlines have done in the past.

But Boeing and its subsidiaries employ 160,000 people worldwide. “We have to protect Boeing,” Trump said last week.

I will be the oversight’
It was not so long ago that Americans were asked to bail out a different set of companies that appeared too big to fail. In 2008, the government propped up big banks, the same institutions that had driven the country into recession, with the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP. Months later the government began spending tens of billions of dollars to help General Motors and Chrysler stave off liquidation.

There are important differences between those packages and the current one, which is much larger and moving through Congress more quickly. Some economists say the aid is likely to benefit workers only if it is closely tailored to ensure the money won’t end up bailing out just companies’ stock prices.

Trump’s declaring “I will be the oversight” for the payouts, as he did Monday, didn’t make these experts feel any better.

that is putting the fox in charge of the henhouse


Industry rescues are only worth doing if they’re a rescue of payroll and wages,” said Josh Bivens, research director at the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute. He said he hoped money could be provided directly to workers to preserve jobs until the “all clear” is sounded. “Then they can make sense,” he said.
Top corporations vowed to do better after the last crisis. Last year, 181 top American chief executives pledged to redefine the purpose of corporations beyond profit by signing a pact for “An Economy That Serves All Americans.” The pact includes promises to support employees and communities.

Perhaps no one could have predicted the depth of the economic devastation wrought by the novel coronavirus. But some companies — at the urging of Wall Street ― often put shareholders and executives first, sometimes to the detriment of preparing for another downturn, labor advocates and some economists said. Now they are in line for cash to pay their staffs as business has ground to a halt.

A year ago Arne Sorenson, chief executive of Marriott, the world’s largest hotel chain, announced the company would return $11 billion to shareholders through buybacks and dividends by 2021. Its share price jumped 3 percent on the announcement.


 
K - get this thru your propaganda ridden brain - I don’t like foreigners criticizing our country or it’s people - simple as that.



that's where you are like trump and don't like the criticism…...and just like trump....you want to do away with free speech if it isn't what you want to hear....you take the good with the back....grow a set of balls and get over it.....a lot of countries do not like this country because of things trump has said and done....again...you chose him to speak for you...listen to what they say back


propaganda...…..that is education...….sorry you choose to do without...but then life in the cultcave huh?
 
It’s nice you defend a Brit attacking our country you unpatriotic sumbitch - shoulda expected no less - Dems NEVER cease to amaze me.
Hmmm, so patriotic (nationalistic). The President you support took the word of our former enemy current adversary, Russian President Putin, former Head of the KGB,- over the collective word of 17 United States Intelligence Agencies and thousands of hours of data and intelligence gathered by hundreds of employees at different levels, on intelligence!
He kicked out the American press, but not the Russian press, when he brought in the Russian Ambassador and Intelligence Head into the oval office.
He said there were some good people among the group of Neo-Nazis.
He's a traitor POS and no one who supports him, no one, can question any other American's level of patriotism. You canceled that line of believability.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top