Wake Up, America! Wake Up! PLEASE!!

[subhub174014]

Link showing 1) IQ of each President, 2) Correct spelling of interpreter, 3) Definition of enterpiter , 4) besides I did look it up and there were aids present! Link showing this, in light of the fact I just posted 2 links showing the meeting was in private

Fake New Subhub174014

want to go back and show you some of yours...you have a few!

 

[nongolfer]

Wrong again there MR. Footnmouth


The Budget and Deficit Under Clinton
https://www.factcheck.org/2008/02/the-budget-and-deficit-under-clinton/

that's if the congressional budget office figures meet your standards.....even if they don't most people go by them

Due to Clinton's compromise with Newt. Fact Check that Fake News subhub!

 

[subhub174014]

Ahh yes, good old Mac...trying to move the goalpost when he gets proven wrong. You brought up the topic of debt with your claim that Clinton didn't add much to the debt. When proven wrong with documented evidence straight from a Democrat controlled white house source....suddenly adding $s to the debt is excusable because you want to switch the topic to interest on the debt.

Presume based on this, you will gladly ignore the portion of the current deficit under Trump that is due to the interest on the $20 trillion in debt he inherited from Obummer correct????

I can't believe you are getting into this argument when you are 0-fer on this board!

 

[subhub174014]

Due to Clinton's compromise with Newt. Fact Check that Fake News subhub!

Clinton let Newt shut the gov down....Newt lost!
check that out!

 

[hoping hubby]

Wrong again there MR. Footnmouth


The Budget and Deficit Under Clinton
https://www.factcheck.org/2008/02/the-budget-and-deficit-under-clinton/

that's if the congressional budget office figures meet your standards.....even if they don't most people go by them

What you've just proven is you don't understand the difference between the deficit and the debt. Mac and I were discussing debt. Your link discusses deficit.

 

[nongolfer]

Ahh yes, good old Mac...trying to move the goalpost when he gets proven wrong. You brought up the topic of debt with your claim that Clinton didn't add much to the debt. When proven wrong with documented evidence straight from a Democrat controlled white house source....suddenly adding $s to the debt is excusable because you want to switch the topic to interest on the debt.

Presume based on this, you will gladly ignore the portion of the current deficit under Trump that is due to the interest on the $20 trillion in debt he inherited from Obummer correct????

MacNFires is Fake News.

Don't confuse him with two issues. Concentrate on he maintains P U T I N never met privately with Obama, and each tme in this thread he has said this, I have posted links showing him to be uninformed at best, dishonest at worst.

Since my links from the Council on Foreign Relations CBS and LA Times. I want to see him continue to post lies in the face of insurmountable evidence to the contrary.

Let him keep digging.

 

[nongolfer]

What you've just proven is you don't understand the difference between the deficit and the debt. Mac and I were discussing debt. Your link discusses deficit.

No, no. He is correct becuase when confronted with fact, he posts links that are in no way related to what he is attempting to prove.

 

[subhub174014]

CLINTON DEFINES THE LIMITS OF COMPROMISE WITH G.O.P.; GINGRICH URGES 'DIALOGUE'
https://www.nytimes.com/1995/04/08/...promise-with-gop-gingrich-urges-dialogue.html


Mmmm who came crawling?

 

[subhub174014]

becuase

what?

 

[subhub174014]

insurmountable evidence to the contrary.

fetching it just a tad

 

[nongolfer]

MacnFries - Obama never met with P U T I N priivately

nongolfer -

http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...m/77297329-157.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

http://www.latimes.com/visuals/video/77297329-157.html

https://www.cfr.org/interview/what-expect-putin-obama-meeting

MacNFries - No, I'm right post a link.

 

[hoping hubby]

2) Correct spelling of interpreter, 3) Definition of enterpiter ,

Don't hold your breath! I think it was before you joined this site, but Sub once called me a moron in a post where he both misspelled and demonstrated he didn't understand the the meaning of the word oxymoron.

 

[subhub174014]

Like I said several pages ago...…..you are a prime example of what this thread is talking about!
a PERFECT example of why things are so fucked up here

 

[nongolfer]

fetching it just a tad

Did you read the first sentence of your link? It's a good link. But it makes my argument more than it makes your argument. Not sure you are aware of this.

 

[subhub174014]

in my haste to type I screw up a word once in a while as do others on here!
but I get the jist of what you are saying and same for you......twist things all you want the facts are still what they are

 

[subhub174014]

Did you read the first sentence of your link? It's a good link. But it makes my argument more than it makes your argument. Not sure you are aware of this.

yes I did...keep reading!


Q: During the Clinton administration was the federal budget balanced? Was the federal deficit erased?

A: Yes to both questions, whether you count Social Security or not.



FULL ANSWER

This chart, based on historical figures from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, shows the total deficit or surplus for each fiscal year from 1990 through 2006. Keep in mind that fiscal years begin Oct. 1, so the first year that can be counted as a Clinton year is fiscal 1994. The appropriations bills for fiscal years 1990 through 1993 were signed by Bill Clinton’s predecessor, George H.W. Bush. Fiscal 2002 is the first for which President George W. Bush signed the appropriations bills, and the first to show the effect of his tax cuts.

just in case you are to lazy and want to shoot off some more

 

[nongolfer]

Well, let's see here, should I believe the CATO institute, or should I believe Fake News subhub?

Who would a reasonable person believe. Reporters, or economic experts?

https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/no-bill-clinton-didnt-balance-budget

 

[nongolfer]

Because not once on here did I say the budget wasn't balacned. I clearly said Clinton''s comprmise with Newt got the budget balanced.

I can keep posting links showing this.

Fake News sub hub cannot post one link showing the opposite.

This being a pattern, I have made up the nick name, Fake News Sub Hub.

res ipsa loquitur

 

[Drillher4me]

in my haste to type I screw up a word once in a while as do others on here!
but I get the jist of what you are saying and same for you......twist things all you want the facts are still what they are

MacFries, then there are those who prefer to believe and rely on "alternative facts, and anything else be damned!

 

[nongolfer]

You are correct. I'm sure MacNfries will be right along to post a link, just one link, disproving anything I have posted, or any of the links I have posted. You know? The links that show he is incorrect, and/or dishonest.

The strange thing is he can't seem to do this. And neither can anyone else. I wonder why that is? Especially since I keep getting told there is all this proof. Should be easy to find with a quick Google search? No?