want to go back and show you some of yours...you have a few!
Wake Up, America! Wake Up! PLEASE!!
- Thread starter Drillher4me
- Start date
- Status
want to go back and show you some of yours...you have a few!
nongolfer
Male
Due to Clinton's compromise with Newt. Fact Check that Fake News subhub!
I can't believe you are getting into this argument when you are 0-fer on this board!
What you've just proven is you don't understand the difference between the deficit and the debt. Mac and I were discussing debt. Your link discusses deficit.
nongolfer
Male
MacNFires is Fake News.
Don't confuse him with two issues. Concentrate on he maintains P U T I N never met privately with Obama, and each tme in this thread he has said this, I have posted links showing him to be uninformed at best, dishonest at worst.
Since my links from the Council on Foreign Relations CBS and LA Times. I want to see him continue to post lies in the face of insurmountable evidence to the contrary.
Let him keep digging.
nongolfer
Male
No, no. He is correct becuase when confronted with fact, he posts links that are in no way related to what he is attempting to prove.
CLINTON DEFINES THE LIMITS OF COMPROMISE WITH G.O.P.; GINGRICH URGES 'DIALOGUE'
https://www.nytimes.com/1995/04/08/...promise-with-gop-gingrich-urges-dialogue.html
Mmmm who came crawling?
https://www.nytimes.com/1995/04/08/...promise-with-gop-gingrich-urges-dialogue.html
Mmmm who came crawling?
what?
nongolfer
Male
MacnFries - Obama never met with P U T I N priivately
nongolfer -
http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...m/77297329-157.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
http://www.latimes.com/visuals/video/77297329-157.html
https://www.cfr.org/interview/what-expect-putin-obama-meeting
MacNFries - No, I'm right post a link.
nongolfer -
http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...m/77297329-157.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
http://www.latimes.com/visuals/video/77297329-157.html
https://www.cfr.org/interview/what-expect-putin-obama-meeting
MacNFries - No, I'm right post a link.
Don't hold your breath! I think it was before you joined this site, but Sub once called me a moron in a post where he both misspelled and demonstrated he didn't understand the the meaning of the word oxymoron.
Like I said several pages ago...…..you are a prime example of what this thread is talking about!
a PERFECT example of why things are so fucked up here
a PERFECT example of why things are so fucked up here
nongolfer
Male
Did you read the first sentence of your link? It's a good link. But it makes my argument more than it makes your argument. Not sure you are aware of this.
in my haste to type I screw up a word once in a while as do others on here!
but I get the jist of what you are saying and same for you......twist things all you want the facts are still what they are
but I get the jist of what you are saying and same for you......twist things all you want the facts are still what they are
yes I did...keep reading!
Q: During the Clinton administration was the federal budget balanced? Was the federal deficit erased?
A: Yes to both questions, whether you count Social Security or not.
FULL ANSWER
This chart, based on historical figures from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, shows the total deficit or surplus for each fiscal year from 1990 through 2006. Keep in mind that fiscal years begin Oct. 1, so the first year that can be counted as a Clinton year is fiscal 1994. The appropriations bills for fiscal years 1990 through 1993 were signed by Bill Clinton’s predecessor, George H.W. Bush. Fiscal 2002 is the first for which President George W. Bush signed the appropriations bills, and the first to show the effect of his tax cuts.
just in case you are to lazy and want to shoot off some more
nongolfer
Male
Well, let's see here, should I believe the CATO institute, or should I believe Fake News subhub?
Who would a reasonable person believe. Reporters, or economic experts?
https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/no-bill-clinton-didnt-balance-budget
Who would a reasonable person believe. Reporters, or economic experts?
https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/no-bill-clinton-didnt-balance-budget
nongolfer
Male
Because not once on here did I say the budget wasn't balacned. I clearly said Clinton''s comprmise with Newt got the budget balanced.
I can keep posting links showing this.
Fake News sub hub cannot post one link showing the opposite.
This being a pattern, I have made up the nick name, Fake News Sub Hub.
res ipsa loquitur
I can keep posting links showing this.
Fake News sub hub cannot post one link showing the opposite.
This being a pattern, I have made up the nick name, Fake News Sub Hub.
res ipsa loquitur
MacFries, then there are those who prefer to believe and rely on "alternative facts, and anything else be damned!
nongolfer
Male
You are correct. I'm sure MacNfries will be right along to post a link, just one link, disproving anything I have posted, or any of the links I have posted. You know? The links that show he is incorrect, and/or dishonest.
The strange thing is he can't seem to do this. And neither can anyone else. I wonder why that is? Especially since I keep getting told there is all this proof. Should be easy to find with a quick Google search? No?
The strange thing is he can't seem to do this. And neither can anyone else. I wonder why that is? Especially since I keep getting told there is all this proof. Should be easy to find with a quick Google search? No?
- Status
