I think you best do a bit more reading, sweetie.
EX: You've left a bar at 1 AM and driving a bit erratic. A cop pulls you over and asked if you've been drinking. You say "yes, I had two drinks" ... the cop request a sobriety test and a search of your car for an open container. You refuse the sobriety test and allowing the cop to search your car.
You want to tell us what your RIGHTS are at this point?
Hello?
This is the problem with people who think higher of themselves than they are knowledgeable.
#1 driving is not a right, its a privilege so you can be pulled over at any time and asked for your documents - this you agree to when you sign your license.
#2 the cop asks if you've been drinking to trick you into giving them an easy probable cause - most people are honest and will tell the truth even if caught doing something wrong. So you say "two drinks" and that, along with your erratic driving gives them enough to arrest you on the spot.
#3 even if you said you didnt say you had a *******, a smell of alcohol on you gives the officer reasonable suspicion that you had and lied which is enough to arrest you.
#4 Most states you cannot refuse a field sobriety test without automatic forfeiture of your license for x months (my state does that) furthermore some states allow a ******* sample to be drawn against your consent if you refuse the field sobriety.
#5 an officer is allowed to search your vehicles cabin if they see something "suspicious" through the windows. If they suspect you got something in the trunk (like *******) they bring a k9 to sniff around the outside of the trunk. If the dog barks, they get to search.
The whole process is VERY formulaic and designed to help them build evidence against YOU but you agreed to it by signing your license. A bail bonds friend told me, "if you get pulled over and you know you're getting a dui the BEST thing to do is say nothing but take me to jail." it minimizes your charges.
However to your point with respect to my posts, Donald Trump did not forfeit his rights when he became president. Congress has oversight into the functioning of the executive branch BUT NOT the president himself nor the life he had before joining office. They dont get insight to what his thoughts are, they dont get foresight to what hes planning. Congress is a co-equal branch of government BUT thats split into two houses filled with about 550 elected representatives so its authority and power is diluted. However the executive is run by one elected person, the president, from whom all other authority in the executive is delegated. So even if all the democrats in congress were against Trump they still dont have the Constitutional power to constrain him UNLESS they had a majority in both houses that can impeach him. (Simple majority in house, 2/3rds in Senate) - the executive is the strong branch of government for that reason. The judiciary is the weak branch. But even then impeachment has to be for "high crimes and misdemeanors" as per the Constitution (when the Constitution was written there was no such thing as a "felony" - a misdemeanor was a crime punishable by death so its not like jaywalking can get you impeached)
If anything the presidents rights should be amplified on account of his great responsibilities to the country and the citizens because of the Constitutionally mandated powers he does not share with anyone else, unlike congress or the courts.
