ah, so maybe the real issue is you feel that the poor, as a whole, are lazy and refuse to earn their way? There are always going to be the poor & oppressed, many put there not of their own choosing. If you're a 'god-fearing' man, maybe its time to crack open that dusty, old bible ...
..........Proverbs 21:13 - "whoever despises his neighbor is a sinner, but blessed is he who is generous to the poor".
.........Proverbs 22:16 - "whoever oppresses the poor to increase his own wealth, will only come to poverty, himself".
.........Deuteronomy 15:11 - "..... for there will never cease to be the poor. Open wide your hand to the needy & the poor in your land".
Ahhh, there you go with your assumptions again - you only think black and white don't you?
Sorry, not a God fearing man. I grew up in a church, I know all to well the hypocrisy of the "conservative christian" They are just as bad as the liberal, just opposite ends of the rope and both to blind the see the truth right in front of them, and
neither willing to compromise. Perhaps you feel that the poor are "too dumb" to climb out of poverty and constantly need your handout? Of course there will always be poor, but not on the scale we have today. I don't expect everyone to live like kings, but with the amount of wealth in this world there is no reason that anyone should be hungry.
Do I think the the poor are lazy and unwilling? not all of them - no. The Vast majority simply need the
means and the
method (you know - teach them to fish), neither of which are provided by our government. Social program don't work, they haven't worked for over 60 years, They only serve to keep the poor - poor. I'm sure there are "success stories" out there, but more and more those who relay on it are becoming more lazy and more unwilling because social programs keep them that way. How many more decades do you think the middle class can afford to dump trillions into social programs? You are always talking about beating a dead cat - social programs are that cat. I would suggest (again) you watch Poverty Inc. but beware, it might burn your ears out.
In this country it is simple to start a new business, however it is one thing to start a business and it is something entirely different to
grow that business. Democratic policies, government red tape, and tax on small business make it even harder. Why is it that only the largest corporations seem to benefit the most with either Democrat or Republican policies? Small companies like mine do not qualify for any tax deductions or subsidies. Grant you we also can skate under most of the regulatory laws as well, but that simply proves that as far as the government is concerned, we don't exists. As long as we pay our taxes is their only concern. Small business and individuals do not have the same protections that large corporations do, just look at what Monsanto has done to the local farmer.
You complain about the Republicans cutting social program - but you don't complain when the Democrats don't reinstate them.
You complain about the Republicans cutting education - but you don't complain when the Democrats don't re-establish funds.
You complain about the Republicans cutting tax to the rich - but you don't complain when the Democrats don't reinstate those.
Should these 3 things be the Democrats first objective each time they have the trifecta? I would think so, but the last Democrat who had the trifecta instead ****** a mandate on the people the majority did not want that. A mandate that did nothing but tax the middle class, give trillions to a crony capitalist corporation called "insurance companies", and ****** thousands of small businesses out of the competition. Sure the Democrats talk a good game, but all we really get is scraps in the end and a dangling carrot with promise of more.
Question: Which is better, a Social program that helps make your house payment until you can get back on your feet (temporary help). Or a social program that forces you to sell your home, move into low income housing and continues to pay your rent as long as you
remain unemployed (long term).
I prefer the first option.