I think it's so insane that the supporters of this tax bill continue to claim that, when you throw billions of dollars at large corporations in the form of big tax breaks, they will increase hiring and add jobs. Absolute fucking nonsense. There is only one reason any company has ever hired more employees, and that is because they needed more to handle an increasing workload. I don't care if you give Exxon or Amazon a trillion dollars, they won't hire one fucking additional worker unless they need one more worker. And this fantasy of corporations giving their employees raises because of these tax breaks? Yeah, I'll just hold my breath until Walmart starts paying their entry level workers a decent rate.
Don't do that, man, it already takes 1.3 liberals voting for every one conservative due to the gerrymandering and voter tamperings. We need to sweep these clowns from office for at least a decade so the country can make a half ass recovery from Trump's generous tax cut for the poor and middleclass.I'll just hold my breath until Walmart starts paying their entry level workers a decent rate.
Got that right. Dontcha just love the trickle-down philosophy? "Well, the reason we keep touting trickle-down economics is because if you give a shitload of tax breaks to the rich, it will trickle down to the poor and middle class eventually when the rich buy stuff." Well, if that's the goal, just give the goddamn tax breaks directly to the poor and middle class.Don't do that, man, it already takes 1.3 liberals voting for every one conservative due to the gerrymandering and voter tamperings. We need to sweep these clowns from office for at least a decade so the country can make a half ass recovery from Trump's generous tax cut for the poor and middleclass.
... but, that isn't the goal. The Republicans want us to think "trickle down's" purpose is to stimulate job growth by handing the wealthy & corporations the money, but it isn't. The purpose of "trickle down" is to create so much debt for the country that eventually we will be ****** to cut & privatize the major government entitlements (social security, Medicare). President GW Bush eluded to that much in his first term. And, they just about got away with it, having run up $10 trillion by the end of his 2 terms. It wouldn't surprise me if our government had something to do with the 9-11 attacks (knowing that the attacks were planned and about to occur) ... knowing that our involvement in wars + adding Medicare, Pt. D would overload the system and ******* us to privatize those programs. Knowing that allowing corporation money into our system (Citizen's United) would create chaos in our system.Dontcha just love the trickle-down philosophy? "Well, the reason we keep touting trickle-down economics is because if you give a shitload of tax breaks to the rich, it will trickle down to the poor and middle class eventually when the rich buy stuff."
You might want to dial back on the eggnog a bit Mac.....if you haven't been drinking, I'd suggest the following:It wouldn't surprise me if our government had something to do with the 9-11 attacks (knowing that the attacks were planned and about to occur) ... knowing that our involvement in wars + adding Medicare, Pt. D would overload the system and ******* us to privatize those programs. Knowing that allowing corporation money into our system (Citizen's United) would create chaos in our system.
.....There has always been a question as to how soon our departments knew an attack IN the US was getting ready to happen. As usual, you miss my point ... instead, focusing on trying to find something to be a wiseass about. You don't know any more than anyone esle, H-H, contrary to your opinion. Your opinion is just that ... YOUR opinion. My point, again H-H was it would not be surprising if it was specifically done to run up debt and ******* everyone in Congress to cut and/or privatize the 3 major entitlement programs. I'm not saying it was ... not even implying that the Bush administration was given early warning. Since this whole tax cutting is to create a shortage of revenue, thus require major spending cuts. GW Bush thought it would happen during his administration ... even going so far as to suggest half of one's SS deduction go into private investment accounts. Grover Norquist said it specifically ... he wanted to "shrink government to a size that he could drown it in a bathtub!"You might want to dial back on the eggnog a bit Mac.....if you haven't been drinking, I'd suggest the following:
.....There has always been a question as to how soon our departments knew an attack IN the US was getting ready to happen. As usual, you miss my point ... instead, focusing on trying to find something to be a wiseass about. You don't know any more than anyone esle, H-H, contrary to your opinion. Your opinion is just that ... YOUR opinion. My point, again H-H was it would not be surprising if it was specifically done to run up debt and ******* everyone in Congress to cut and/or privatize the 3 major entitlement programs. I'm not saying it was ... not even implying that the Bush administration was given early warning. Since this whole tax cutting is to create a shortage of revenue, thus require major spending cuts. GW Bush thought it would happen during his administration ... even going so far as to suggest half of one's SS deduction go into private investment accounts. Grover Norquist said it specifically ... he wanted to "shrink government to a size that he could drown it in a bathtub!"
....Now for a change in 2018, why don't you try to ADD something to the conversation besides your normal, useless Bullshit remarks. Or, are you simply incapable of doing that, just as Trump is incapable of telling the truth?
https://www.snopes.com/info/lists/911rumors.asp
https://www.politico.eu/article/attacks-will-be-spectacular-cia-war-on-terror-bush-bin-laden/
I realize that. I can read. Please reference our previous discussion regarding relative size of brainpansI'm not saying it was ... not even implying that the Bush administration was given early warning.
and suggested they knowingly might have done that to:It wouldn't surprise me if our government had something to do with the 9-11 attacks
As I said, if you seriously "think" that way, you need to lay off the eggnog. You're falling pretty deep into kookdom!overload the system and ******* us to privatize those programs.
Please kindly refer to previous comments on my level of give a shitness regarding your orders.Now for a change in 2018, why don't you try to ADD something to the conversation besides your normal, useless Bullshit remarks. Or, are you simply incapable of doing that, just as Trump is incapable of telling the truth?
You got that right! I wouldn't give it a second's thought, personally! In fact, I'd send President Trump a nice note saying Trump was right ... political correctness sucks ... its my wedding, my guests and the Obamas are OUR friends. That would squeeze his EGO, particularly if it also got leaked out to the media, which I would see that it did, soooooo ..... "burn in hell"Don't know why they should care.....after all the one in question has offended about everyone on the planet
its my wedding, my guests and the Obamas are OUR friends. That would squeeze his EGO, particularly if it also got leaked out to the media, which I would see that it did, soooooo ..... "burn in hell"