If you let men suck your dick, you's gay, not a bull

Ok. That was our mistake, then, as we don't want to mislead anyone. How can we be more honest, if what we're looking for is Dom bulls, bi women, femdom couples. My wife's bi, I'm open to some kinds of bi play, but bi play isn't a requirement for either one of us.

What's the least predatory and misleading way to say that? Please keep in mind that neither of us is interested in meeting gay men.
I’m not here to give honesty lessons. You were taught how to be honest in kinder garden.
 
Tell The Truth Reality GIF by Robert E Blackmon
 
Lotta gay dudes in denial on here.

Nothing wrong with being gay but being gay and denying it or calling yourself “straight” is dishonest to say the least.
He right, these there are a lot of Married couples that want Bi males and it crazy, I turned down many meet ups lately because they want there hubby to suck a BBC. There also many black men that would do whatever to get some married white pussy. Well I know who I am and I love women not guys. But no disrespect to any gay or bi guys or couples. I know that ain't me.
 
Bruh I’m glad you know now that’s why I never called myself a “Bull” because it’s all straight up Homo bullshit. This site has turned into some weird gay Cuck wacko type *******. So the nuts are running the damn nut house. Someone should have told Batman to blow up Arkham Asylum seriously.

But yeah bruh Straight Blackmen are a dying breed in Western Culture and we are actually the ones under attack these day’s mostly all that nutty crap is from these “New Generation” liberals who push these crap ass agendas and couples who support this ******* are fucktards to. Most them fools on some bait and switch bullshit.
Honestly Super, when I say I didn't know this was so much a bi/gay thing, I didn't know. That was the whole purpose for my making this thread, which I stated up front, and then many people put their own spin on in.

Now I know better. This is like the porn industry in one sense, meaning that a lot of the guys who do straight porn are also bi, and like I said, I guess, and I guessed correctly, that is why so many bi and gay men masquerade around here.

The straight guys on here who are not into that stuff are really probably a minority. It may not even be too far to call this website a largely bi/gay hangout. It might not have always been that, I don't know, but it sure as hell looks like that is what is it now.
 
Last edited:
Honestly Super, when I say I didn't now this was so much a bi/gay thing, I didn't know. That was the whole purpose for my making this thread, which I stated up front, and then many people put their own spin on in.

Now I know better. This is like the porn industry in one sense, meaning that a lot of the guys who do straight porn are also bi, and like I said, I guess, and I guessed correctly, that is why so many bi and gay man masquerade around here.

The straight guys on here who are not into that stuff are really probably a minority. It may not even be too far to call this website a largely bi/gay hangout. It might not have always been that, I don't know, but it sure as hell looks like that is what is it now.
Exactly my G I agree but I’m one straight dude who stays far away from anything like that.💯
 
Honestly Super, when I say I didn't now this was so much a bi/gay thing, I didn't know. That was the whole purpose for my making this thread, which I stated up front, and then many people put their own spin on in.

Now I know better. This is like the porn industry in one sense, meaning that a lot of the guys who do straight porn are also bi, and like I said, I guess, and I guessed correctly, that is why so many bi and gay man masquerade around here.

The straight guys on here who are not into that stuff are really probably a minority. It may not even be too far to call this website a largely bi/gay hangout. It might not have always been that, I don't know, but it sure as hell looks like that is what is it now.
It kinda reminds of dudes that say their straight but they have sex with guys for money when their doing porn, I'd be like dude
you're not straight even if it's for a job
 
So if we are just looking for fun and willing to let the bedroom stay there we are gay?

We have been in many situations with people where we just go with the flow as it harms no one, We are not out looking for sexual encounters with same sex partners but in the bedroom and all is going well and no one is harmed why be an asshole, we had a situation where the guy wanted my husband to suck his dick, he did it a bit but we did not really enjoy. So guess my husband is gay, what ever. you say.

I don't understand the wholediesease thing either, is the suggestion that gays spread more diseases. It seems more factually correct to say anyone regardless of sexual preference who has multiple partners is at higher risk and unprotected sex increase the risk.

So much judgement to unpack and posts filled with ignorance. Best of luck.
 
I agree with you're definition, if being on the receiving end from another male than a bull i am not. I have nothing against or will pass no judgment to the ones that participate in the festivities but its not something I'd do. I scrolled through the video's to see what new as well from time to time and saw a bull quote unquote, fucking the cuck. I had the definition wrong myself any of that was my defiof gay or bi. Like I said if they like it I love it. Just didnt match the definition of being dominant or being the alpha male i had in mind or the situations i have been a part of.
According to some of these characters here, someone male sucking off another man is straight. Again, according to them, the circumstances determine whether he is or not. Whaaaaaat???? Really?

To me you gotta be sick in your head if you're thinking some ******* like that. If you' letting a man suck yo' dick, you gay, *******. End of story as far as I'm concerned.

By their logic, I guess if the so called bull fucks a man he's probably not straight but super straight.

I just block all of them with these wacko warped ideas. I'm not interested in having a back and forth discussion about this. Like I told one of them, the sky is not blue, it's acquamarie or turquoise.
 
Last edited:
I’m pretty sure a strong majority of Black dudes who sign up for this site have zero intention to interact with men at all. Most of us just want to knock down some middle aged white women in peace.

The whole cuckold lifestyle as it exists today seems to be based on dishonesty and predatory behavior. The fact that so many profiles on here are fake women and fake couples illustrates this.
Preach.
 
So if we are just looking for fun and willing to let the bedroom stay there we are gay?

We have been in many situations with people where we just go with the flow as it harms no one, We are not out looking for sexual encounters with same sex partners but in the bedroom and all is going well and no one is harmed why be an asshole, we had a situation where the guy wanted my husband to suck his dick, he did it a bit but we did not really enjoy. So guess my husband is gay, what ever. you say.

I don't understand the wholediesease thing either, is the suggestion that gays spread more diseases. It seems more factually correct to say anyone regardless of sexual preference who has multiple partners is at higher risk and unprotected sex increase the risk.

So much judgement to unpack and posts filled with ignorance. Best of luck.
You are married to a man who sucks dick, apparently.
 
@avaadore
For the record, I'm not sure if I'm one of the people you think is gay bashing. I'm telling you this because we've chatted a bit outside of here and as far as I can tell, you're a reasonable person.

Anyway, I have no interest in bashing any gay person if you consider me among the list of those doing that. At the same time, if any of them bi or straight members are upset because I made a post about trying to find out what is the composition of this lifestyle or website, I don't care.

Last time I checked, this was a free country, and around here, it's free to ask such a question, as far as I can see.

I don't know any of them and they don't know me. They're just avatars online to me. If they feel like they are being bashed by my asking about secret and predatory behavior, so be it. With some of them taking offense to my stating my former ignorance about the nature of this bull cuck lifestyle, and furthermore calling a man sucking any man straight, it's not a far cry for me to grasp pratically anything I say with the word bi or gay in it, will be considered gay bashing by them, or they may otherwise take issue with it.
 
Last edited:
I agree with your post and most of your comments.

I agree there's a prevalence of gay and bisexual men on this site which, when it spills out of the appropriate threads dedicated to such content, violates the site terms of use.

I agree that if you're engaging in homosexual acts, you aren't straight and it's deceptive to represent yourself as such.

I do find the notion that dominance is negated by sexual orientation problematic but I understand where the line of thought comes from and while it borders the territory, I don't think of it as full out gay bashing.

The comments I'm referring to should be glaringly obvious.
Ok.
 
I’m not here to give honesty lessons. You were taught how to be honest in kinder garden.
Yes, and well before kinder garden [sic], actually. And I've told the truth in every post here. Every bull we've ever played with is still our friend, including my wife's current regular bull of more than two years, with whom there's been zero male/male contact. None were lied to in any way. And I'm not being deceptive to you, I've told you exactly what we're about. So if you won't tell me what part is deceptive or how to fix it, will you tell me who we're deceiving, exactly? And who are we preying upon?
 
Last edited:
Exactly I really can’t stand those bisexual dudes and that facts atleast gay and lesbian folks know and understand their place im not going to sit here and sugarcoat anything because I really don’t put up with bullshit. But a lot of bisexual dudes spread the most disease and Im not cool with that ******* at all so I stay far away from them.💯
Well that's good news. If gay folks are good with you and only bi folks aren't, you have nothing to worry about with us. I've been assured by at least 8 or 9 of you that I'm 1000% gay, not bi.
 
Turns out when we describe it that way, we meet the wrong people (who all think we're being deceptive). So we're gonna stick with something like, "We like Dom/sub play. Wife is bi, and as hubby's full-time Domme, she seeks dominant bulls who can help her explore her submissive side. Hubby doesn't seek out contact with dudes, so no male/male contact is necessary if you're not looking for bi play, but he does what his wife (and her bull, if he wants to help Dom) tell him to do. She does play by herself, but we both prefer when he is to be included in play to whatever degree all are comfortable."

To us, that seems a lot less like denial, and a lot less misleading. Sorry if that isn't a big enough admission of guilt for your tastes, but it's a lot more accurate than "IT'S GAY!"


I like this type of description as a straight male since it puts all cards on the table. As for being Gay I would say if labeling this would be considered Bi or Gay but we can never truly know which one you are. Only you and your wife or a regular male partner playing with you two could reason or determine. You would only be Gay if you prefer or only want men. If you aren't turned on by women you are Gay.

If you are turned on by both sexes then you are Bi.

It is simple but we not knowing you or anyone can not say for certain you are Gay for Certain but definitely at least Bi. This is the same with many others however if the male half of a couple makes it a deal breaker that guy playing with them is Bi then male half is more likely to be Gay. If the male half can not let his female half be pleasured alone or in a threesome with him talking part and also without playing with other males then he is Gay. A Bi male should be okay with not having to play with every male joining them at least if they are taking part in lifestyle to please their female half.

The same applies to women in the reverse scenario.
 
Yes, and well before kinder garden [sic], actually. And I've told the truth in every post here. Every bull we've ever played with is still our friend, including my wife's current regular bull of more than two years, with whom there's been zero male/male contact. None were lied to in any way. And I'm not being deceptive to you, I've told you exactly what we're about. So if you won't tell me what part is deceptive or how to fix it, will you tell me who we're deceiving, exactly? And who are we preying upon?

You two are not the ones straight males are talking about if you are completely honest in your profile, date postings or initial contact with straight males. We are only talking about those that aren't. So I am not sure why you are arguing with males here.

As for the straight males here I wouldn't bother them since if he is being honest with his intentions and statements on profile, posts, initial communication with straight males then they are cool. No matter what the male wants to be labeled he stated his honest intentions at least based on his posts here in this thread. I do not have an issue with their interactions with straight males if they are completely honest with what they stated.

I only disagree perhaps with how he wants to label himself and others. But if he is honest with what they want and expect not using labels then it is all good. He doesn't have to label himself though he shouldn't argue with those that use labels either. He doesn't need to apply label to himself as long as he is honest with what they/he wants in profile, posts and communications.
 
You two are not the ones straight males are talking about if you are completely honest in your profile, date postings or initial contact with straight males. We are only talking about those that aren't. So I am not sure why you are arguing with males here.

As for the straight males here I wouldn't bother them since if he is being honest with his intentions and statements on profile, posts, initial communication with straight males then they are cool. No matter what the male wants to be labeled he stated his honest intentions at least based on his posts here in this thread. I do not have an issue with their interactions with straight males if they are completely honest with what they stated.

I only disagree perhaps with how he wants to label himself and others. But if he is honest with what they want and expect not using labels then it is all good. He doesn't have to label himself though he shouldn't argue with those that use labels either. He doesn't need to apply label to himself as long as he is honest with what they/he wants in profile, posts and communications.
This is all very nice of you to say, and I appreciate it. But @MagicMikeATX says we're "trying to flip it," and that we "are the main culprits for this nonsense." I asked @Thrillmonger3X how I could more accurately describe our scenario, since he didn't like the way I described it. He called me "Gay as fuck," "Gaaaaaaay," and still says we're "predatory and dishonest." When I pressed him to find out what was dishonest and how we could do better, he said he wasn't here to give me lessons. @superdick33 said point blank, he's cool with gays and lesbians, but not bisexuals. Luckily, it seems he doesn't believe bisexuals actually exist, because any bi play is gay to him. So I guess we're... all good?

So the men I've taken the time to engage with here ARE talking to us (or just me). They're quoting me in direct replies. Many of you don't agree with them (@YoungandHotGuy was polite enough to say what you did, about how if we're honest, we're not who you're talking to) but none of you are correcting them either. Y'all in here high fiving a bunch of extreme homophobes, talking about how deceptive cucks are.

Now, I'm not gonna say that no cuck has ever been deceptive. Especially on this site. If a couple here isn't verified, there's a very good chance they're not a couple at all. But these creepy, basement-dwelling incel posers, telling all cucks they need to be completely celibate cocksuckers for superior black bulls or whatever, are themselves not cucks, and I suspect most are single. At least I assume this, because what woman stays with a man that porn-addicted and self-loathing and obsessed? There are also quite a few married wannabes. They might talk about gay and bi topics a lot, but their wives aren't into it. The ones I've talked to were nice guys, and since their wives aren't into it, you'll never met them anyway. So, you don't have to worry that they'll try something. I promise, you'll never met one of them in person.

Now, are the real cuckold couples really any more deceptive than other groups? It's been mentioned multiple times here that some men have encountered women trying to cheat on the down low. So apparently women aren't above being deceptive. And as I've mentioned, nearly half of the black men my wife has played with have had her "make" me suck their cocks. Yet all but one of them claimed to completely straight on their profiles. That outlier chose the term "open-minded." Ironically, he was the least insistent of all of them that I fluff him. So single black men clearly aren't above a certain level of deception either. Although in their case, it's hard for me to fault them. After seeing how accepting of bisexuality people here are, it's no wonder they prefer to keep that ******* on the DL. They were all polite about it and set expectations with my wife or both of us ahead of time, so it wasn't a problem. I will say though, if we're gonna holler about deception, I think it needs to be acknowledged that it ain't people like us -
— a couple who've made dozens of long-term, in-person lifestyle friends — that you have to worry about. Deception comes in all shapes, sizes, colors and genders, unfortunately.

I have never propositioned a single man to "let" me suck his dick. I've never taken a bull in the ass, and if I ever did, my wife and I aren't stupid enough to let something that's been in my ass go in her pussy, so all this stupid disease talk is nonsense, too. Mike's brought it up the most, as far as I can tell, and he's one of the biggest advocates of unprotected sex on this site. Maybe he had the good sense not to shove his raw dick in his partners' pussies after giving it to them in the ass, but how confident can he be that none of her other partners did? Girls were trampy enough to go raw dog with him, they're trampy enough to spread any of the ******* he was talking about. No bi hubby needed. And there's no conclusive data that says bi people spread any more disease than anyone else. It's used here as an excuse to justify hating on bisexual people, which the OP has described using the word "Yuck," before putting us on ignore.

So I'm truly glad to hear that you're another reasonable person, who doesn't judge us as long as we tell the truth. Thank you for that. Now if you can just get some of your rude, scared, gay/bi-bashing, cuck-flaming friends here to see it your way, that'll be great.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top