well I would think if she was not going to be trumps pawn...she could answer a few questions...especially the one on voter fraud.....since it is already a law...and 20 states ignoring it......not even going into the trump thing should it come up
Barrett, Declining to Detail Legal Views, Says She Will Not Be ‘a Pawn’ of Trump
Judge Amy Coney Barrett flatly refused on Tuesday to pledge that she would recuse herself if a dispute over the Nov. 3 election came before the Supreme Court, insisting that despite her nomination by President Trump, she would not “allow myself to be used as a pawn to decide this election for the American people.”
During a nearly 12-hour question-and-answer session, Judge Barrett evaded Democratic senators’ attempts to pin down her views on the Affordable Care Act, abortion rights, gay marriage and a possible election-related case. She played down her history of taking conservative stances in legal writings and personal statements, arguing that she might view issues differently as a sitting justice.