Wake Up, America! Wake Up! PLEASE!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Drillher4me said:
gotta be rolling over in his grave and laughing his ass off at the idiototic ramblings of this
excuse for a President!
Below is a pic that does justice to Trumps (sic) thinking and destroys the myth that he's rational!
Click to expand...

Might want a refund on your "Grammer" and Spellun classes....

Clearly most of the liberal dolts are still connected to the Matrix and therefore couldn't understand the deeper meaning of Trump's comment:
1566482374999.png
 
Allforthewifey said:
https://www.facebook.com/liberalasuck/photos/a.236238206865342/537933116695848
Click to expand...



they do it with mail in ballots....several times!

The scandal in North Carolina proves voter fraud is real
https://nypost.com/2018/12/06/the-scandal-in-north-carolina-proves-voter-fraud-is-real
Maybe ballot security isn’t such a bad thing after all. Democrats who the day before yesterday were insisting that voter fraud didn’t exist now believe that it was used to steal a North ...

Texas Senate panel targets mail-in ballot fraud after high ...
https://www.texastribune.org/2017/07/23/texas-senate-panel-targets-mail-ballot-fraud
Jul 23, 2017 · Republish this story. “Mail-ballot voting is a prime target for illegal voting and election fraud,” said Sen. Kelly Hancock, R-North Richland Hills, who authored the measure, Senate Bill 5. “In the U.S., the right to vote is sacred. Any attempt to steal an American's vote … must be addressed.” In a …
 
Allforthewifey said:
https://www.facebook.com/liberalasuck/photos/a.236238206865342/427691791053315
Click to expand...


Why Do Republicans Keep Defending Donald Trump?
do-republicans-keep-defending-donald-trump.html
As the president gets more unhinged, the party rallies to his defense. The most obvious answer is simple partisanship: President Trump is the leader of the Republican Party, and as we approach midterm elections, even disgruntled Republicans have a reason to keep good relations with the White House.

A veteran GOP strategist explains why conservative elites ...
republican-elites-back-trump
Mar 22, 2017 · Tax cuts and business-friendly nominees. “All the rest is noise.” Trump is delivering, fundamentally, what the business community wants: a light regulatory touch, a business-friendly Supreme Court, and progress toward a big tax cut. Gun rights enthusiasts, abortion opponents, and other key Republican-aligned interest groups can say the same.

Why Republicans dutifully defend Trump's most ridiculous lies
https://theweek.com/articles/687872/why-republicans-dutifully-defend-trumps-most...
Mar 27, 2017 · And that was the reason almost every Republican lined up behind Trump in the first place: They may have had their reservations about him, …

Why Are Republicans Choosing Party Over Country? | HuffPost
republicans...
Why Are Republicans Choosing Party Over Country? Trump is a liability and there’s a tremendous risk to Republicans in thinking he is immune from political gravity. 06/09/2017 08:04 am ET Updated Jun 09, 2017 President Donald Trump’s Russia scandal is testing the resiliency of America’s democracy.


The GOP’s Dangerous Pattern of Putting Party Over Country
washingtonmonthly.com

The 1 Percent's Contempt for Democracy

Donald Trump isn't the only plutocrat subverting our democracy.
washingtonmonthly.com washingtonmonthly.com
gops-dangerous-pattern-of-putting-party-over-country
McConnell’s inaction while the Russians attacked the integrity of the presidential election is a feature of the modern Republican Party, not a bug. I’m talking about objectively clear and historically pivotal moments in which the GOP literally chose party over country. McConnell’s inaction while the Russians attacked the integrity of the presidential election is a feature of the modern Republican Party, not a …
 
blkdlaur said:
Anybody else get a kick outta the nonstop lefty propaganda flow in here ????

ALWAYS good for a belly laugh - that and the same stream coming from CNN - makes me hum listen ta the bull ******* fly to meself ;}
Click to expand...

a chance to educate yourself....but it is apparent you gave up on that years ago

whaaaa booo hooo sob snif whaaaa
 
Why do Republicans always deny the truth when you show a ...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110826204728AApCN3N
Aug 26, 2011 · Best Answer: They vote for a party that claims to be fiscally responsible, but has outspent the Dem party every time they've been in power. They claim to support the Constitution, but flat out don't believe in the 1st, the 4th, the 14th or 16th amendments to the Constitution. Who knows why they do what they ...

Republicans Don't Like Facts. - POLITUSIC
www.politusic.com

Politics: The Far Right Wing

Politics and philosophy of the far right republican party from a different perspective.
www.politusic.com www.politusic.com
republicans-hate-facts
Republicans Hate Facts. I understand that facts can get in the way of politics, but the republican political tactic of ignoring all things factual is unsettling. Ignoring facts is one thing, creating their own, isolated truth is when it gets scary. The more extreme right wing within the GOP’s ability to mutate blog rumor in “truth worth fighting for”...

Why Do Republicans LIE about everything? | Yahoo Answers
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20111225072252AAaLTfE
Dec 25, 2011 · It has nothing to do with politics but rather a lack of ethics and morals on the part of the individual. People lie in general to protect themselves and to hide activities expected to be harshly judged by the general population. You apparently lie in an effort to put out your agenda but it doesn't make what you state the truth.

Republicans Quotes (129 quotes) - goodreads.com
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/republicans
Republicans Quotes. They stand four-square for the American home--but not for housing. They are strong for labor--but they are stronger for restricting labor's rights. They favor minimum wage--the smaller the minimum wage the better. They endorse educational opportunity for all--but they won't spend money for teachers or for schools.

Both Sides Don't Do It: Study Finds Republicans Lie Three ...
https://www.politicususa.com/2013/05/29/sides-it-study-finds-republicans-lie-times...
The reason why Republicans can get away with lying so often is because the mainstream media refuses to challenge them. The media has become a willing …

Would Jesus Vote Republican? - Rapture Ready
https://www.raptureready.com/would-jesus-vote-republican
The Republican Party has been branded by the Democrats to be the “party of greed.” This label is not stamped without a degree of legitimacy. Man is a greedy being in his fallen state. Politicians within both major parties use the love of money to step on the backs of those they are supposed to serve.
 
More truth on the republican ignorance......not one article here today from CNN....FACTS from an assortment of sources


The moral and intellectual bankruptcy of the Republican Party
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2017/dec/04/the...
Dec 04, 2017 · The moral and intellectual bankruptcy of the Republican Party Dana Nuccitelli The GOP strategy on taxes and climate: reject evidence and expert opinion, lie, and wage culture wars

100 Examples of GOP Corruption, Lies, and Ignorance (Part 1)
joozly.com/blog/2010/07/100-examples-of-gop-corruption-lies-and-ignorance-part-1
@djgambitron this is about GOP corruption you fucking idiot, this guy’s a republican himself. We can point hundred of things wrong with that dickhead clinton, but his addressing the 100′s GOP corruption, lies and ignorance. Maybe conservapedia is for people like you with a little brain.

How Did the Republican Party Get So Corrupt? - The Atlantic
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/12/how-did-republican-party-get-so...
Dec 14, 2018 · Richard Nixon’s administration was also riddled with criminality—but in 1973, the Republican Party of Hugh Scott, the Senate minority leader, and John Rhodes…

The Republican Party’s Corruption Will Bring Them Down ...
newrepublic.com

The Republican Party’s Corruption Will Bring Them Down—Again

They've forgotten just how badly corruption can hobble an administration.
newrepublic.com newrepublic.com
republican-partys-corruption-will-bring-downagain
Jan 04, 2017 · By Brian Beutler. But even less conspicuous corruption has a way of seeping into the realm of substantive governing, and incurring indirect political costs. It is widely believed that the Iraq war, Hurricane Katrina, and the bursting of the housing bubble drove the collapse of the Bush GOP. This is completely true,...
 
m.ranker.com

Corrupt Democrats

Disgraced politicians come in all shapes and sizes. No matter what your political affiliation, this list of corrupt Democrats proves that no party is safe from corruption. These are Democratic politicians with criminal records; they have been found guilty in a court of law. The United States is a...
m.ranker.com m.ranker.com
 
Liberal facts - are - fucts

Short for fucked facts

Gullible - must be their forte

Over 2 years of pushing the collusion delusion and these yo yos still believe the media - still argue the horseshite - UNFUCKINBELIEVABLE : }
 
TwoBiFour said:
And where did I state that? Do you not comprehend?

"Racism really knows no political party. " Meaning you can be any political party and still be a racist - democrat, Republican, whatever. Good Grief - no wonder. It also knows no color - this BS that blacks can't be racist is just that - BS.
Click to expand...
You need to be clearer in your writing then, because racism knowing no political party doesn't mean what you said as you've cleared it up in this last post.
Plus, it is EXTREMELY well documented that right wing parties tend to harbour more racists. That's just a fact. Good grief, know your history! You might, as a nation, be less likely to ignore the lessons of history if you do.
 
Allforthewifey said:
https://www.facebook.com/liberalasuck/photos/a.236238206865342/336325646856597
Click to expand...




Lies, Non-Truths, Falsehoods and Misleading Statements: The Revisionist History of Trump's Team

Senator Al Franken of Minnesota said Tuesday that he now believes Attorney General Jeff Sessions is guilty of perjury. Sessions isn't the only member of President Trump's operation to be accused of producing falsehoods to a congressional committee, however. Below are 10 core members of Trump's team and a sample of the untrue or misleading statements they have made.

As ProPublica notes, the attorney general took a detour from the question at hand to say something false at his confirmation hearing. Asked by Al Franken about reports that Trump staffers and associates were in contact with Russian officials repeatedly during the campaign, Sessions had this to say:

"Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians."

But a Washington Post report last week found Sessions spoke to Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak on two separate occasions during the campaign. Since the report, Sessions and his camp have alternately said he misunderstood the question, that he "did not recall" the specifics of their conversation, and that they only made "superficial comments about election-related news."

However, Sessions responded similarly to a written pre-hearing question about Russian contacts from Senator Patrick Leahy.

He later clarified his testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee. Senator Franken called that response "insulting," and later made the perjury claim.

Sean Spicer

Barely 24 hours into his job as White House Press Secretary, Sean Spicer claimed that his boss' inauguration was "the largest audience ever to witness an inauguration, period." It was not. When CNN's State of the Union turned down the chance to host Spicer's colleague Kellyanne Conway because of issues with her credibility, Spicer subsequently said CNN "walked back or denied" those reports. That was not true. He also cited a terror attack in Atlanta three separate times while defending the travel ban. There was no attack, and Spicer later said he "clearly meant Orlando."

And way back during the campaign, Spicer defended Trump's comments in The Mobile Locker Room to The Weekly Standard by questioning if what Trump described—grabbing women "by the pussy"—was sexual assault. Spicer then accused the Standard of fabricating his quote, so they released the audio of him saying it.
Scott Pruitt

The EPA administrator—and, as Oklahoma attorney general, frequent suer of the EPA—was asked about an issue vital to the nation's conservatives: email.

"Have you ever conducted business using your personal email accounts, nonofficial Oklahoma attorney general email accounts, text messages, instant messenger, voicemails, or any other medium?" Senator Cory Booker asked Pruitt in a pre-hearing questionnaire.

"I use only my official OAG email address and government-issued phone to conduct official business," Pruitt responded.

But in a February 17 report, ProPublica pointed out that Oklahoma City's local FOX 25 News found Pruitt did occasionally use a private account. The report was corroborated by the Associated Press and the Oklahoma attorney general's office. Pruitt could ask for some advice here from Vice President Mike Pence, who railed against Hillary Clinton's use of private email throughout the campaign and also used an AOL account for official business as Indiana governor.
Kellyanne Conway

While questions remain as to whether the special counsel to the president believes in the concept of objective truth, she's certainly run afoul of it. The most infamous example was the "Bowling Green Massacre," an entirely fictional terrorist attack Conway referenced in multiple interviews with different outlets. When she was called on it, she said it was "an honest mistake."
Steven Mnuchin

In written pre-hearing testimony, ProPublica notes, the new Treasury Secretary wrote that his former bank, OneWest, did not "'robo-sign' documents" while foreclosing on homes in the aftermath of the Great Recession.

According to The Columbus Dispatch, however, the bank used the practice in Ohio:

But a Dispatch analysis of nearly four dozen foreclosure cases filed by OneWest in Franklin County in 2010 alone shows that the company frequently used robo-signers. The vast majority of the Columbus-area cases were signed by 11 different people in Travis County, Texas. Those employees called themselves vice presidents, assistant vice presidents, managers and assistant secretaries. In three local cases, a judge dismissed OneWest foreclosure proceedings specifically based on inaccurate robo-signings.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below​

Nice. On the way to foreclosing on more than 36,000 homes, OneWest also reportedly foreclosed on a 90-year-old woman over 27 cents.

Stephen Miller

The White House senior adviser's pet topic is voter fraud. He said on the Sunday shows that thousands were bussed into New Hampshire from Massachusetts to vote for Hillary Clinton, a claim first made by former Gov. John Sununu and rated "pants on fire" by Politifact.

He also said that "you have millions of people who are registered in two states or who are dead who are registered to vote. And you have 14 percent of noncitizens, according to academic research, at a minimum, are registered to vote, which is an astonishing statistic." The Washington Post rated Miller's claims false: While one study did show some voter registration records were out of date, the study's author has specifically said it provided no evidence of voter fraud:

David Becker

✔ @beckerdavidj

We found millions of out of date registration records due to people moving or dying, but found no evidence that voter fraud resulted.

12:18 PM - 28 Nov 2016

Betsy DeVos

ProPublica reminds us that Senator Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire suggested the now-Secretary of Education was involved in a family foundation that has provided millions in funding to anti-LGBT groups.

When Democratic Senator Maggie Hassan pointed out that DeVos sits on the board of the foundation, DeVos bluntly replied, "I do not."

As The Intercept found, though, DeVos was listed as a vice president of the foundation on IRS filings for nearly two decades. DeVos called this a clerical error.

Elsewhere, DeVos had some trouble with the numbers. In written pre-hearing testimony, according to NPR, DeVos defended virtual charter schools—where high-school students take all their classes online—in general terms. That was fine, but then she provided some specific data about graduation rates at some of those institutions:

Idaho Virtual Academy (IDV A): 90 percent

Nevada Virtual Academy (NVV A): 100 percent

Ohio Virtual Academy (OHV A): 92 percent

Oklahoma Virtual Charter Academy (OVCA): 91 percent

Texas Virtual Academy (TXVA): 96 percent

Utah Virtual Academy (UTV A): 96 percent

Wisconsin Virtual Academy (WIV A): 96 percent"

As NPR pointed out, all these numbers were wrong. Nevada Virtual, for instance, had a 63 percent rate—not 100. Ohio's was 53, and Utah's was 42. The Trump administration did not respond to NPR's request for comment on the faulty numbers, but they appear to come from a report by the for-profit company that runs these virtual schools.
Reince Priebus

The White House chief of staff, whose name is clearly an anagram, claimed on CBS' Face the Nation in January that John Podesta's email was easy to hack because his password was "password." There is no evidence this is true, so it's unsubstantiated at best.
Rex Tillerson (Maybe)

The water is murkier here, but when asked about his history of lobbying against sanctions on Russia, the Secretary of State offered: "I have never lobbied against sanctions. To my knowledge, Exxon never directly lobbied against sanctions."

However, as ExxonMobil's CEO, Tillerson TK would have known about this piece of lobbying, documented by Politifact:

Government lobbying records show that in 2014 and 2015, Exxon paid the Nickles Group over $193,000 to press "issues related to Russian sanctions impacting the energy sector," along with a number of other matters. It paid another $120,000 in 2014 and 2015 to Avenue Solutions for work on a range of issues, including "energy sanctions in the Ukraine and Russia." In the same time frame, according to public logs, Tillerson visited the White House five times to see Jeffrey Zients, director of the National Economic Council. The meetings started about a week after President Barack Obama authorized the first of three rounds of sanctions. Bloomberg reported that Tillerson saw Treasury Secretary Jack Lew seven times in the second half of 2014. The Treasury Department oversees how sanctions are carried out.

Politifact rates Tillerson's answer as "artfully crafted" but "pretty misleading" and, ultimately, "mostly false." Moreover, Foreign Relations Committee Chairman and Republican Bob Corker reminded Tillerson in the hearing that he had called him personally in response to the sanctions. Corker later gave Tillerson a bail-out opportunity, which he took, claiming that "ExxonMobil participated in understanding how the sanctions are going to be constructed," rather than lobbied against them.







This Level of Corruption Is Unprecedented in the Modern History of the Presidency

Just like the fire department would really rather come into a building when there was smoke coming out of one window instead of when there are flames coming out of every window, because it's a lot easier to control the fire early on, it's much easier to control an epidemic early on. It's almost as though the entire bureaucratic immune system of the government is reacting to an invading virus. The worst thing any of us can do is assume that the ascent of El Caudillo del Mar-A-Lago was not the sui generis event that it clearly was, and that he, himself, is not the sui generis occupant of the White House that he clearly is, and that he has not surrounded himself with dubious quacks and hacks that are sui generis in their approach to government as they clearly are. There is a level of intellectual—and, perhaps, literal—corruption that is unprecedented in the modern history of the presidency and that is a genuine and unique threat to democratic institutions that are the objects of destructive contempt. ...



www.esquire.com

This Level of Corruption Is Unprecedented in the Modern History of the Presidency

And it's threatening our democracy.
www.esquire.com www.esquire.com
 
This Level of Corruption Is Unprecedented in the Modern History of the Presidency

And it's threatening our democracy.

The important part about dealing with epidemics is to deal with them early. Just like the fire department would really rather come into a building when there was smoke coming out of one window instead of when there are flames coming out of every window, because it's a lot easier to control the fire early on, it's much easier to control an epidemic early on.

It's almost as though the entire bureaucratic immune system of the government is reacting to an invading virus. The worst thing any of us can do is assume that the ascent of El Caudillo del Mar-A-Lago was not the sui generis event that it clearly was, and that he, himself, is not the sui generis occupant of the White House that he clearly is, and that he has not surrounded himself with dubious quacks and hacks that are sui generis in their approach to government as they clearly are.

There is a level of intellectual—and, perhaps, literal—corruption that is unprecedented in the modern history of the presidency and that is a genuine and unique threat to democratic institutions that are the objects of destructive contempt. The man ran on chaos. He won on chaos. And now he's governing on chaos. The checks and balances and safety valves of the Constitution—the things that, well, constitute—the immune system of this self-governing republic are facing a threat that is as different as it is lethal.

The man ran on chaos. He won on chaos. And now he's governing on chaos.

The latest manifestation of this phenomenon is the sudden firing of U.S. Attorneys all over the country—specifically, those appointed by the previous administration. It is true that every president can do what this president did, and that most have. But the people who said all through the campaign that the rules changed with the elevation of Donald Trump cannot say that the rules are back now that he's president. In addition, what he did on Friday was precipitous in the extreme and so much so that it seems to have been improvised on the spot, and that it might have been prompted by a virulent paranoia at the White House about "deep-state" saboteurs, a feeling encouraged by the hardbar caucus in Congress and pimped heavily by the conservative media auxiliaries.

By contrast, in 2009, the newly elected Barack Obama put his U.S. Attorneys in place, but he didn't fire all of the incumbent ones all at once without having the faintest idea who their replacements might be. And this was in the wake of the naked politicization of the DOJ during the Bush Administration. From Tiger Beat On The Potomac:

"I expect that we'll have an announcement in the next couple of weeks with regard to our first batch of U.S attorneys," Holder said Thursday during a House Judiciary Committee hearing which stretched out over most of the day due to breaks for members' votes. "One of the things that we didn't want to do was to disrupt the continuity of the offices and pull people out of positions where we thought there might be a danger that that might have on the continuity—the effectiveness of the offices. But...elections matter—it is our intention to have the U.S. Attorneys that are selected by President Obama in place as quickly as they can." Holder's comments begin to resolve questions in the legal community about whether the new administration would hesitate to replace the chief prosecutors en masse because of the intense controversy that surrounded President George W. Bush's unusual mid-term replacement of nine U.S. attorneys in late 2006. In addition, legal sources said some Bush appointees were looking to burrow in, in part to avoid a grim economic climate for private-sector legal jobs."

But, as we are relentlessly told by people who are whistling past a considerable graveyard, Donald Trump is different. He certainly is. Already, there are serious questions about his violations of the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution, about how and where he got his money, about how seriously we should take his claim to have divorced himself from his business interests, and about the precise relationship he has with kleptocrats the world over, especially in Russia. In that context, his decision all at once to decapitate the Justice Department at the local level takes on a more sinister character.

And then there's the case of Preet Bhahara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and the scourge of the money power in New York City, which definitely includes the current president* of the United States. The man was the swamp-drainer supreme. The situation with Bharhara already is stranger than usual. In the first place, a week ago, Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III had asked Bhahara to stay on. Also, Bhahara has a number of investigations that may or may not hit too close to home at the White House, including one involving Fox News. And, as has become customary with this administration, the whole matter was handled with the delicacy of a monkey trying to fck a football. From The Washington Post:

Within the Justice Department, some are questioning whether a recent phone call from Trump to Bharara may have contributed to the decision to remove the Obama holdovers, according to a person familiar with the matter. On Thursday, a White House aide called and left a message for Bharara, saying the president wanted to speak with him, though the prospective topic of discussion was unclear. Bharara consulted his staff and determined that it would probably be a violation of Justice Department protocols for him to speak directly to the president, this person said. That protocol exists in order to prevent political interference—or the appearance of political interference — with Justice Department work.

He's shaking up Washington! He's exploding political norms! He's also lighting his own pants on fire. By forsing the administration to fire him, Bharara managed to maneuver the World's Greatest Dealmaker into elevating Bharara's profile even higher, and to draw the spotlight down on what Bhahara's investigations, past and present. He also set up Bhahara as a free radical in our politics; the defrocked U.S. Attorney already is talking about his "absolute independence," which ought to freeze the bowels of a lot of people with plans for the future. If, one day, we're all talking about Senator Preet Bhahara, then the current president* will get a big assist.

He's shaking up Washington! He's exploding political norms! He's also lighting his own pants on fire.

There's a kind of momentum building inside and outside the government right now. For a long time, I thought the Republicans in Congress could hold out against the encroaching chaos long enough to pass their wish list, which the president* would sign, because that beats working and he doesn't know anything. But the way they've botched health-care makes the congressional majorities look as though they've both been hit in the head with a hammer. (The mischief out in the states, however, is still ongoing, and as strong as ever.)

It's possible that too many things are coming from too many directions for that strategy to work any more. The way you'll know if that situation reaches a tipping point will be if the various legislative intelligence committees of the Congress looking into the Russia business give up the job either to a special prosecutor or to some sort of blue-ribbon 9/11-type commission. You want chaos? That will be chaos, and the patient may flat-line.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

C
Stepping it up
2
Replies
24
Views
2K
Curtis7800
C
B
I love filling up a tight white pussy with my thick long black dick
2
Replies
20
Views
2K
mightB2big4u
M
BigBadWolf84
  • Question
Question about advertising a friend
Replies
0
Views
43
BigBadWolf84
BigBadWolf84
C
Need help with subtle idea for next step
2
Replies
22
Views
1K
Caldosch
C
J
Has HE ever slept over?
Replies
0
Views
181
Jimsopen
J
Back
Top