And given your locality @MacNfries you could rightfully criticize Trump with the repairs done after Florence and give us a first-hand account of whether or not Trump is doing a good job there as well.
With Kavanaugh now in the SCOTUS would you think that would happen? Plus it is unprecedented for any American president to be locked up after his term elasped as president? Undoubtedly you are studying countless various laws to make it stick, but I doubt it will. But you are most welcome to prove me wrong.I never said I do have all the answers, just correcting all the Trump BS that people create & spew regarding Trump and his administration. That's why they're getting subpoenaed and going to jail ... as will Trump & his family someday. What has he accomplished, besides signing executive orders to reverse Obama legislation? Tax cuts for the middleclass ... "better and less expensive health care" ... wall paid for by Mexico ... taking babies & children from Hispanic families ... nuclear disarming N Korea & Iran ... the man's done NOTHING for the average American HERE.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/1053803001The average millennial has 60 grand in savings? Do tell.
That's why they're getting subpoenaed and going to jail ... as will Trump & his family someday.
I suggest you READ the article ... the deficit is expected to hit $1 TRILLION in 2020. Trump is a super CON, nothing else. Nothing he says comes true for middle America.
What exactly has Trump "turned around"?
No, me & about 200 million others like me are VICTIMS of his big FRAUD. And you can count on me criticizing him ... until he's no longer our President.
Average millennial... Riiiiight...https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/1053803001
One report, there are many others. ML specifically says $60K
So,what you are counting on is for the President to choose Kavanaugh as his judge because Kavanaugh says a sitting president can't be charged with a crime? Is that your position? Just when does ANYONE in the US get to pick their own judge & jury? Think of the state of our government IF that was to happen. There would be no doubt, then, that we were now under a dictatorship.With Kavanaugh now in the SCOTUS would you think that would happen? Plus it is unprecedented for any American president to be locked up after his term elasped as president?
Even if Kavanaugh failed to join the SCOTUS, it is unprecented for any American president to get locked up for anything during his term in office as I suspect there is a legal team he has that looks out for him for when the umbrella of POTUS is lifted from Trump. When you have to make the very hard decisions of going to war and other things undoubtedly mistakes will be made and legally he would be protected in any and all circumstances.So,what you are counting on is for the President to choose Kavanaugh as his judge because Kavanaugh says a sitting president can't be charged with a crime? Is that your position? Just when does ANYONE in the US get to pick their own judge & jury? Think of the state of our government IF that was to happen. Hopefully, after the lambasting the Republicans will get in the mid-terms, the Senate will move forward with removing the sorry excuse for a President Trump. And if he's not convicted in federal courts for his money crimes & espionage, the state of NJ is waiting in the wings to try him in a state court of law ... not a thing federal judges can do with that one.
Average! Meaning some may have zero and some have $100K plus. It averages out. And since they are the largest demographic population, they have significant savings. So don’t lump all millenials into those still living with their parents. The oldest millenials are 37 and many are bankers, doctors, lawyers, engineers, etc. focus on those that have done something and not those that can’t get it together.Average millennial... Riiiiight...
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/09/a-g...illennials-have-absolutely-nothing-saved.html
The likes of Trump are unprecedented, STIFF. No sitting president has ever met privately with our adversaries, or shared highly classified documents with our adversaries. And to my knowledge Trump does not have a government sponsored legal team after he leaves office, just a few years of secret service.Even if Kavanaugh failed to join the SCOTUS, it is unprecented for any American president to get locked up for anything during his term in office as I suspect there is a legal team he has that looks out for him for when the umbrella of POTUS is lifted from Trump.
Maybe so but it's cheaper than wars and the loss of life that comes with it. If conversely if the unmentionable occurred with North Korea and/or Russia wreaking havoc in America, militarily speaking specifically with ICBM's, people would scream why didn't Trump seek a peaceful solution? Remember Dershowitz? He did say if everything with Russia was true, it's not a crime. And that's coming from a Harvard Law Professor? Perhaps you might have discovered a flaw in his argument? Or quite possibly you might be concealing degrees in Law that eclipses his distinguished accomplishments? If so, feel free to share them and any flaws he has with his arguments @MacNfries.The likes of Trump are unprecedented, STIFF. No sitting president has ever met privately with our adversaries, or shared highly classified documents with our adversaries. And to my knowledge Trump does not have a government sponsored legal team after he leaves office, just a few years of secret service.
The likes of Trump are unprecedented, STIFF. No sitting president has ever met privately with our adversaries, or shared highly classified documents with our adversaries. And to my knowledge Trump does not have a government sponsored legal team after he leaves office, just a few years of secret service.
Maybe so but it's cheaper than wars and the loss of life that comes with it. If conversely if the unmentionable occurred with North Korea and/or Russia wreaking havoc in America, militarily speaking specifically with ICBM's, people would scream why didn't Trump seek a peaceful solution? Remember Dershowitz? He did say if everything with Russia was true, it's not a crime. And that's coming from a Harvard Law Professor? Perhaps you might have discovered a flaw in his argument? Or quite possibly you might be concealing degrees in Law that eclipses his distinguished accomplishments? If so, feel free to share them and any flaws he has with his arguments @MacNfries.
https://www.blacktowhite.net/threads/politics-politics-politics.35353/page-480#post-1423862
If, if, if ... welcome to Monday morning quarterbacking. Right wingers have played that card for years.If conversely if the unmentionable occurred with North Korea and/or Russia wreaking havoc in America, militarily speaking specifically with ICBM's, people would scream why didn't Trump seek a peaceful solution?
Think that one out just a tiny bit ... so what Dershowitz is saying is if the President (not mine) chooses to share the ICBM launch codes with Russia or anyone else, because he is the President, it isn't a crime? That one would be a good test for his new friend in the SCOTUS Kavanaugh to answer.Remember Dershowitz? He did say if everything with Russia was true, it's not a crime. And that's coming from a Harvard Law Professor?
I'll warn you here, if you desire to continue a civil conversation with me, you'll back off that sarcasm or not bitch when I start dishing it back at you.Perhaps you might have discovered a flaw in his argument? Or quite possibly you might be concealing degrees in Law that eclipses his distinguished accomplishments?
I only know you online @MacNfries for all I know you could be an attorney in the Carolinas somewhere? Or you could have studied Law too? With regards to Dershowitz you might want to double check his background? Undoubtedly he must be getting a lot of flak from your side and at present I am not sure if this is still the case, but if you check his Wikipedia page Dershowitz at that time was a registered Democrat at the time he defended Trump. So I think that it would make it difficult for him to join with Trump's team?If, if, if ... welcome to Monday morning quarterbacking. Right wingers have played that card for years.
Think that one out just a tiny bit ... so what Dershowitz is saying is if the President (not mine) chooses to share the ICBM launch codes with Russia or anyone else, because he is the President, it isn't a crime? That one would be a good test for his new friend in the SCOTUS Kavanaugh to answer.
Dershowitz is a Harvard Law Professor ... Yes, common sense, highly debatable. As has been mentioned, he's on the Trump team at Fox; he'll legitimize practically any Trump decides to do. Trump's already admitted sharing highly classified information with Russia when no one else from his administration was around. It pissed off Republican members of the House ... yet nothing done. Trump's not qualified to share sensitive information with anyone ... much less Russians.
I'll warn you here, if you desire to continue a civil conversation with me, you'll back off that sarcasm or not bitch when I start dishing it back at you.
View attachment 2147139