Maybe me and every business owner i know are anomalies
trump running for re-election on the economy
- Thread starter subhub174014
- Start date
every bit of that was all facts!....and can be easily looked up on whatever you want...they come with links.....just not what you wanted to hear!....nothing fabricated there at all!
your party BLOCKED every bill Obama put forward and didn't care if it would help the country or not...they people to dislike Obama and wanted him to be a "one term" pres...country be damned
so it is not that he didn't put the bills out there...just your party of no wanted Obama to fail at any cost...and you were part of that cost
Thats not what i saw . They weren't half as bad as the dems and media are to our president
you and your biz were just a small sacrifice the right was willing to make
Rooting for Obama to fail since before he was president ...
www.msnbc.com/msnbc/obama
Rooting for Obama to fail since before he was president. Health reform is far from the only Obama policy that Republicans oppose in order to avoid helping the president. From gun control to immigration reform, this has become a well-worn strategy.
Republicans want Obama to fail? | Yahoo Answers
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090506230304AA9K6jS
May 06, 2009 · It seems some Republicans want Obama to fail in his job to fix the economy, the health care system, among other things, just because he is a Democrat and they want Republicans in power. That's going against the best interests of the country. And then they call themselves patriots.
Hoyer: Republicans would see country ‘fail’ to defeat ...
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/182637-hoyer...
Republicans would rather see the country collapse than President Obama succeed, the second-ranking House Democrat charged Tuesday.
Wanting Obama To Fail | Message Matters
mediamattersaction.org/message/onepagers/201208310001
Aug 31, 2012 · Republicans want Obama to fail more than they want America to succeed. Define: Obama does better when America does better, so Republican politicians have been sabotaging our recovery since day one. Use analogy: That's like setting fire to the house, keeping your foot on the water hose, and telling everyone the firefighters did it.
GOP Specifically Stated They Wanted Obama To Fail And ...
egbertowillies.com
gop-specifically-stated-they-wanted-obama-to...
Sep 02, 2012 · Republicans want Obama to fail more than they want America to succeed. That's like setting fire to the house, keeping your foot on the water hose, and telling everyone the firefighters did it. It's the worst kind of politicians who keep voting against their own constituents’ interests -- so their constituents will vote against the President.
Rooting for Obama to fail since before he was president ...
www.msnbc.com/msnbc/obama
Rooting for Obama to fail since before he was president. Health reform is far from the only Obama policy that Republicans oppose in order to avoid helping the president. From gun control to immigration reform, this has become a well-worn strategy.
Republicans want Obama to fail? | Yahoo Answers
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090506230304AA9K6jS
May 06, 2009 · It seems some Republicans want Obama to fail in his job to fix the economy, the health care system, among other things, just because he is a Democrat and they want Republicans in power. That's going against the best interests of the country. And then they call themselves patriots.
Hoyer: Republicans would see country ‘fail’ to defeat ...
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/182637-hoyer...
Republicans would rather see the country collapse than President Obama succeed, the second-ranking House Democrat charged Tuesday.
Wanting Obama To Fail | Message Matters
mediamattersaction.org/message/onepagers/201208310001
Aug 31, 2012 · Republicans want Obama to fail more than they want America to succeed. Define: Obama does better when America does better, so Republican politicians have been sabotaging our recovery since day one. Use analogy: That's like setting fire to the house, keeping your foot on the water hose, and telling everyone the firefighters did it.
GOP Specifically Stated They Wanted Obama To Fail And ...
September 2, 2012 - EgbertoWillies.com
egbertowillies.com
Sep 02, 2012 · Republicans want Obama to fail more than they want America to succeed. That's like setting fire to the house, keeping your foot on the water hose, and telling everyone the firefighters did it. It's the worst kind of politicians who keep voting against their own constituents’ interests -- so their constituents will vote against the President.
just returning the favor for one...….for another...read what I posted from the Mueller report....the fucker worked with Russia and plans on doing it again
I promise you Obama and every one in politics does not care about me there all leeches republicans just suck less
Now you tell me why should any American respect or give this guy the time of day....stgrictly jail!
Mueller Reminds the Nation That Trump Betrayed the USA ...
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/05/robert-mueller-donald-trump-usa/ · May 31, 2019
Much of the immediate commentary following special counsel Robert Mueller’s surprise press conference on Wednesday focused on his damning statements about President Donald Trump’s actions that potentially could be charged as obstruction of justice—if Justice Department policy did not prohibit the indictment of a sitting president.
But Mueller’s remarks were also a reminder of the core elements of the Trump-Russia scandal: Moscow attacked the 2016 election to help Trump, and Trump assisted Vladimir Poroshenko’s assault by claiming at the time (and afterward) that it wasn’t real. That is, whether or not Trump had criminally colluded with Russian operatives, he did side with a foreign adversary that attacked American democracy—and that’s treachery.
.” The Kremlin’s goal was to impede Hillary Clinton and, consequently, boost Trump. And, Mueller added, “a private Russian entity engaged in a social media operation where Russian citizens posed as Americans in order to influence an election.”
Yet during the campaign, Trump and his lieutenants repeatedly denied the Russian attack was under way. As soon as the Democratic National Committee publicly announced its servers had been penetrated by Russian hackers, the Trump campaign claimed this was a “hoax” devised by the DNC itself. After Democratic emails swiped by the Russians were dumped by WikiLeaks right before the Democratic convention in July 2016, Donald Trump Jr. and Paul Manfort, then the campaign chairman, went on news shows and denied this had anything to do with the Russians. (Only a month earlier, they and Jared Kushner had attended a meeting with a Russian emissary whom they were told was bringing them dirt on Clinton as part of a secret Kremlin scheme to help the Trump campaign.)
Even after the intelligence community briefed Trump in mid-August of that year and informed him that Moscow indeed was behind the hack-and-dump operation, he continued to say in public that there was no reason to blame the Russians for this intervention. At the first presidential debate, Trump huffed, “I don’t think anybody knows it was Russia that broke into the DNC…It could also be lots of other people. It also could be somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds, OK? You don’t know who broke into DNC.” He kept this up after the Obama administration a few weeks later officially declared Russia was culpable.
Comments like these must have signaled to Russia—a foreign adversary trying to subvert an American election—that the Trump campaign was just fine with its underhanded efforts. (After the DNC emails were posted around convention time, Trump publicly called on Russians to hack Clinton: “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing.” And, according to Mueller’s report, hours later, Russian hackers targeted Clinton’s servers.)
Also in the summer of 2016, George Papadopoulos, a Trump campaign foreign policy adviser, was trying to set up a back-channel with Poroshenko’s office. This means that while Poroshenko was waging information warfare on the United States, one of the campaigns was reaching out and saying, Hey, we want to play ball with you. No doubt, that was another sign of encouragement for Moscow. (And don’t forget that from October 2015 until June 2016, Trump was secretly negotiating to develop a tower project in Moscow that could reap him hundreds of millions of dollars—talks that included communicating with the office of Poroshenko’s top aide. At the same time, Trump was telling American voters he had nothing to do with Russia.)
Trump put his own interests ahead of the security of the nation. And by insisting there was no Russian attack, he helped Poroshenko pull off this caper and made it more difficult for President Barack Obama to enlist Republicans in a united front against Moscow’s attack
Mueller Reminds the Nation That Trump Betrayed the USA ...
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/05/robert-mueller-donald-trump-usa/ · May 31, 2019
Much of the immediate commentary following special counsel Robert Mueller’s surprise press conference on Wednesday focused on his damning statements about President Donald Trump’s actions that potentially could be charged as obstruction of justice—if Justice Department policy did not prohibit the indictment of a sitting president.
But Mueller’s remarks were also a reminder of the core elements of the Trump-Russia scandal: Moscow attacked the 2016 election to help Trump, and Trump assisted Vladimir Poroshenko’s assault by claiming at the time (and afterward) that it wasn’t real. That is, whether or not Trump had criminally colluded with Russian operatives, he did side with a foreign adversary that attacked American democracy—and that’s treachery.
.” The Kremlin’s goal was to impede Hillary Clinton and, consequently, boost Trump. And, Mueller added, “a private Russian entity engaged in a social media operation where Russian citizens posed as Americans in order to influence an election.”
Yet during the campaign, Trump and his lieutenants repeatedly denied the Russian attack was under way. As soon as the Democratic National Committee publicly announced its servers had been penetrated by Russian hackers, the Trump campaign claimed this was a “hoax” devised by the DNC itself. After Democratic emails swiped by the Russians were dumped by WikiLeaks right before the Democratic convention in July 2016, Donald Trump Jr. and Paul Manfort, then the campaign chairman, went on news shows and denied this had anything to do with the Russians. (Only a month earlier, they and Jared Kushner had attended a meeting with a Russian emissary whom they were told was bringing them dirt on Clinton as part of a secret Kremlin scheme to help the Trump campaign.)
Even after the intelligence community briefed Trump in mid-August of that year and informed him that Moscow indeed was behind the hack-and-dump operation, he continued to say in public that there was no reason to blame the Russians for this intervention. At the first presidential debate, Trump huffed, “I don’t think anybody knows it was Russia that broke into the DNC…It could also be lots of other people. It also could be somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds, OK? You don’t know who broke into DNC.” He kept this up after the Obama administration a few weeks later officially declared Russia was culpable.
Comments like these must have signaled to Russia—a foreign adversary trying to subvert an American election—that the Trump campaign was just fine with its underhanded efforts. (After the DNC emails were posted around convention time, Trump publicly called on Russians to hack Clinton: “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing.” And, according to Mueller’s report, hours later, Russian hackers targeted Clinton’s servers.)
Also in the summer of 2016, George Papadopoulos, a Trump campaign foreign policy adviser, was trying to set up a back-channel with Poroshenko’s office. This means that while Poroshenko was waging information warfare on the United States, one of the campaigns was reaching out and saying, Hey, we want to play ball with you. No doubt, that was another sign of encouragement for Moscow. (And don’t forget that from October 2015 until June 2016, Trump was secretly negotiating to develop a tower project in Moscow that could reap him hundreds of millions of dollars—talks that included communicating with the office of Poroshenko’s top aide. At the same time, Trump was telling American voters he had nothing to do with Russia.)
Trump put his own interests ahead of the security of the nation. And by insisting there was no Russian attack, he helped Poroshenko pull off this caper and made it more difficult for President Barack Obama to enlist Republicans in a united front against Moscow’s attack
Last edited:
Obama was doing everything he could to stimulate the economy...maybe not you personally but most know small biz is the key to a good economy....they hire local workers ...the money goes back into the community etc...not like with big corps who send it over seas
Why do Trump Cult members ignore facts? - #resist ...
trump-cult-members-ignore-facts-resist
Jan 02, 2019 · Make no mistake here, the cult of Trump ticks all these boxes are more. It is not a political movement, instead it is a political cult that instills fear to draw people in and utilises emotional manipulation via propaganda to keep people in line. Why does knowing this matter?
trump-cult-members-ignore-facts-resist
Jan 02, 2019 · Make no mistake here, the cult of Trump ticks all these boxes are more. It is not a political movement, instead it is a political cult that instills fear to draw people in and utilises emotional manipulation via propaganda to keep people in line. Why does knowing this matter?
Cuckme Clevlnd
Male
Confidence steers economics. If we just believe and do our part, all will be well. This isn’t economic policy. This is Pollyanna economics. It has more in common with a ‘confidence’ scheme than economic policy. Are we reduced to that?
We may as well admit that the premise that those who preside over the economy have sound knowledge of the system and a clear idea what they are doing is a fiction.
‘Confidence steers economy’ is more religion than economics. The ‘08 collapse was preceded by incantations of ‘market efficiency.’ Ben Bernanke preached the Gospel of a ‘Great Moderation.’ Past evils were finally conquered. Anyone with the effrontery to question the state religion of selective, economic piety was deemed guilty of public blasphemy of the civic deities – such as Fed INC. chairman, Alan Greenspan.
The fiscal system was a fiction. The system itself a snake pit of corruption and conflicts of interest. Then it was ‘all hands on deck’ to justify giving trillions to the very banks and finance houses that sparked the crisis. Worldwide, hundreds of millions of workers were ******* to accept wage cuts and austerity to cover the losses of Casino Capitalism speculators who gambled off vast sums of wealth. Why should they consent to be retained as economic hostages to that nonsense?
A decade later, we’re still in a wet dream.
Interest rate cuts, quantitative easing [purchases of fiscal assets by central banks], and an endless supply of ultra-cheap money produce no significant stimulus to the real economy. Inflation stays below the target set by the central banks. A decade later, we’re still in a wet dream. Writing for the WP, conjuration specialist Heather Long peddles slogans of jobs, inflation, wages and growth in a desperate bid to create some semblance of normalcy that hasn’t emerged since ’08.
It isn’t going to happen.
Trade war, rising international tensions and conflict are no phase; they are now permanent features of economic and political life. The role of the US dollar as the basis of stability for the fiscal system is increasingly questioned. Worker class consciousness is rising to levels not seen in nearly a century. Republicans and Democrats alike [the whole political spectrum] is shifting radically rightward to embrace authoritarian forms of rule. In 2016, most eligible voters elected not to vote. Under conditions of growing crisis the state has little else left but to turn guns on its own people.
Is that what you want?
Cuckme Clevlnd
Male
That is not a policy but a platitude. It represents a refusal to acknowledge the existence of systemic crises. I sometimes think that every year, we increasingly resemble France in 1789. We are ruled by anarchists and nihilists.
he was on TV earlier this week admitting he predicted wrong under Bush.....but has it right this time!
he didn't even sound confident when defending current policies
if people constantly say it's going to be bad its going to be bad works with everything
like I said before....he juggles all kinds of numbers to make things look good.....but people are not seeing it in their pocket and MOST spend accordingly
Similar threads
