only the biz we were getting fucked on maybe we should eat our own food
trump running for re-election on the economy
- Thread starter subhub174014
- Start date
I think we do pretty much eat our own food...….AND we sell a lot more to other countries....Mexico was probably the second biggest...china being the biggest...and when trump started in on mexico...they shopped around a lot for another source and didn't want to come back to the US....think trump knew and moved a little off center...Mexico still buys all they can from spain….but spain just can not meet mexico's demands....but whatever they buy from spain is a loss for the us.....china buying some now from Russia...but have no idea how that is going as Russia still struggling them selves
want to hear something crazy......chickens we raise them....send them to china to be "cleaned" and then sent back....what the hell does that cost?
every imported processed food made with foreign food
Consumer confidence stays constant in August amid China trade war
One measure hit a 20-year peak, however.
Consumer confidence stays constant in August amid China trade war
One measure hit a 20-year peak, however.www.foxbusiness.com
where you getting your info from?
US consumer confidence June 2019 - cnbc.com
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/25/us-consumer-confidence-june-2019.html
Jun 25, 2019 · Consumer confidence drops more than expected, reaching its lowest point in nearly two years Published Tue, Jun 25 2019 10:01 AM EDT Updated Tue, Jun 25 2019 11…
Consumer Confidence Index® | The Conference Board
Data | The Conference Board
The Conference Board is a global, independent business membership and research association working in the public interest
www.conference-board.org
Jul 30, 2019 · The Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index Rebounded in July . 30 Jul. 2019. The Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index ® rebounded in July, following a decrease in June. The Index now stands at 135.7 (1985=100), up from 124.3 in June.
although you are right....seems to be hanging in there for now......but that report runs from July to july...so doesn't have a lot to go on yet
News feed on phone thats current report
Cuckme Clevlnd
Male
No. It's a case of two, equally loathed figures locked in a race to the bottom. One emerged from the criminal underworld, the other a despised symbol of corrupt Washington insiderism and darling of the military/intelligence community. As I recall, 54% of eligible voters elected not to vote. Such dynamics create false perceptions of the meaning of elections, their outcome and role in society.
How many have strength of will and intellect to consider what this means regarding the measure of official 'legitimacy' that resides in the public mind?
LUV ta hear ya CRY’N : }
Cuckme Clevlnd
Male
The US dollar is the basis for half of world trade invoices and two-thirds of global securities issuances. Since the US accounts for only 10 percent of global trade and 15 percent of global GDP, why should the world retain the dollar as the world reserve currency?
This isn't sustainable. The world needs other arrangements. Many things will change. Quickly.
This isn't sustainable. The world needs other arrangements. Many things will change. Quickly.
well I think even with the dollar going to pot......no matter how bad our economy gets....the dollar is pretty much established world wide....china is trying to push their "dollar" but not doing it...the ruble no where near as good or as strong they are just barely making it right now with the sanctions congress has on them....if trump would have followed through with what congress wanted on the election meddling they would be in deep *******...but trump didn't believe they meddled and wouldn't sign the rest of the sanctions......Europe just doesn't have one....so for now it will stay the us dollar for a long time
The U.S. economy is slowing, but a recession is not inevitable yet - The Washington Post
The U.S. economy is slowing and warning signs are growing, but a downturn isn’t inevitable yet
who cares what the numbers show......remember what Obama inherited....go the job market back going got the stock market back up there....all kinds of things that helped the economy and the country....and yet.....no one saw anything in their pocket so he didn't do a good job...….kind of like now....trump can juggle the numbers all he wants and say whatever...the people are NOT seeing it....said he gave corps all kinds of money so economy should be fine....but they don't pass it on....trickle down just does not work and never has...Reagan tried it and took us from the richest country to one of the biggest borrowers...bush tried it and gave us the recession......trump thinks he can change that track record?????The U.S. economy is slowing, but a recession is not inevitable yet - The Washington Post
The U.S. economy is slowing and warning signs are growing, but a downturn isn’t inevitable yetbeta.washingtonpost.com
he is on a course for a bigger disaster than bush because he has done a lot more than bush did...and we all know where that went
The jist of article is consumer confidence steers economy so stop bitching and start spending tell everyone its. Good and its good
and one more time Obama sucked
Facts!
I want to review some numbers with you, because unless you’re a hyper-informed political junkie, I doubt you know them. How many net jobs has the economy created during Barack Obama’s presidency, and how many did it create during George W. Bush’s tenure? Notice first that I wrote “has the economy created” rather than “did Obama create/did Bush create.” I think it’s a better description of reality.
I also should note that I just measured the numbers under each president—I gave Bush the numbers from January 2001 to December 2008, and Obama the numbers from January 2009 to the present, with the following asterisk. January 2009 was when Obama became president, but he didn’t start until the 20th, of course. That was a particularly awful month, with 798,000 jobs lost. So I think it’s reasonable to give Bush, whose policies helped cause the meltdown anyway, two-thirds of that 798,000. (January 2001, by the way, was a tiny number, 30,000 jobs lost, but just to be consistent, I assigned only 10,000 of those to Bush.)
Here are Bush’s numbers: It’s 8.657 million jobs gained, and 7.121 million jobs lost, for a net job-creation number of 1.536 million. Pathetic. It’s interesting to look back over the numbers from 2001. The economy stank. The month of 9/11, we lost 242,000 jobs. Want to ascribe that just to the attacks? In August, we’d lost 158,000. The decent Bush years were 2004, 2005, 2006, and part of 2007, but even then the numbers were hoppy and inconsistent: 307,000 jobs added in May 2004 and just 74,000 in June, for instance.
And what about Obama’s numbers? I’d betting that even if you’re an Obama partisan, you think they’re not all that different from Bush’s. After all, 2009 was miserable: minus 798,000, minus 701,000, minus 826,000, and so on. The numbers went into the black in early 2010, but dipped back into the red in the summer. But remember, since October 2010, every report has been positive—the now 45 straight months of job growth that the president and his team, to little avail, crow about.
But they’ve added up, because under Obama, the economy has added 9.425 million jobs and lost 4.887, for a net gain of 4.538 million jobs. That’s a 3 million advantage over Bush. Now, 6.5 million jobs doesn’t put Obama up there in Clinton (22 million) and Reagan (around 16 million) territory. But remember—he has 30 months to go yet. Let’s say we average a gain of 250,000 a month the rest of the way. That’s another 7.5 million. And that would edge him up toward Reagan territory. And that seems conservative, if anything. If the recovery gets genuinely humming, we could start seeing months between 300,000 and 400,000 next year. It seems unlikely to happen, but God would it be hilarious if Obama, with everything the Republicans in Congress have done to keep the economy in a state of contraction, ended up surpassing Reagan.
[UPDATE: I rechecked my math this morning, and it's a good thing I did. I had originally given Obama nearly 2 million more jobs created than the actual numbers reflect. Obviously, I want to be accurate here. I added and re-added these three times.]
But all that’s speculative. After all, there could be a recession coming, too, though most experts don’t seem to fear that much. So let’s just talk about the up to now, the 6.5 million net jobs. As I said before, I bet you didn’t know that. Why?
Two main reasons. One, the administration doesn’t go a great job of trumpeting it, and I think for good reason. Officials may feel constrained from doing too much boasting because a lot of people’s perception and experience is still worse than that. A lot of these aren’t great jobs, and the economy is still only doing real well for the top 5 or 10 percent.
The second reason is that figures on the broad left simply aren’t superficial cheerleaders. The two men who are probably the most influential economic voices on the left, Paul Krugman and Robert Reich, have both been pretty harsh critics of the administration’s economic policies, as have other liberal economists. They, and less well-known but still prominent people such as Dean Baker, look at the numbers and report the truth as they see it. Democratic politicians are cheerleaders in varying degree—there’s Debbie Wasserman Schultz on the rah-rah end, but most Democrats don’t brag too much for the same reason the White House doesn’t.
And the media voices on the left—the folks on MSNBC, say—try to accentuate the positive in political terms, but they don’t ignore the bad news by any stretch of the imagination. MSNBC talks a lot about obstreperous Republicans, a theme to which I certainly contribute on air, but the network also offers a consistent diet of news features on and interviews with people stuck in the dead-end economy and having a hard time of it, segments that usually demand the government do more.
Now, imagine that a Republican president produced 45 straight months of job growth coming off the worst financial crisis since the Depression. Lord, we’d never hear the end of it from Fox and Limbaugh and even from CNBC. They wouldn’t care about the reality that a lot of the jobs are low wage. They’d just trumpet the bottom-line numbers as evidence of their president’s Churchillian greatness.
That’s how they are, and nothing’s going to change them. The important question now, as I said up top, is whether we’re really turning the psychic corner. Corporations have been hoarding record profits, banks still aren’t lending they way they should be, businesses have been skittish about large-scale hiring. It’s a big game of economic chicken, and it certainly has a political element. Most of these corporate titans and bankers and business leaders are Republicans. I don’t think most of them would intentionally hold the economy back because they don’t like the president, but I do think they take their cues from elected Republicans more than from Obama. When the Republicans stand up and say repeatedly that the president’s policies are failing, failing, failing, these private-sector titans hear them, and it influences what they do.
It may be that we’re finally working our way through all that. Happy days aren’t yet here again, but, once again, Democrats, the alleged socialists, are saving capitalism from the supposed lovers of capitalism who almost destroyed it.
Why You Don’t Know Obama Has Created 4.5 Million Jobs
Do you have any idea how many more jobs Obama has created than Bush did? You don’t, because liberals are less likely than conservatives to cheerlead.
www.thedailybeast.com
Obama Outperforms Reagan On Jobs, Growth And Investing
The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) today issued America’s latest jobs report covering August. And it’s a disappointment. The economy created an additional 142,000 jobs last month. After six consecutive months over 200,000, most pundits expected the string to continue, including ADP which just yesterday said 204,000 jobs were created in August.
One month variation does not change a trend
Even though the plus-200,000 monthly string was broken (unless revised upward at a future date,) unemployment did continue to decline and is now reported at only 6.1%. Jobless claims were just over 300,000; lowest since 2007. Despite the lower than expected August jobs number, America will create about 2.5 million new jobs in 2014.
And that is great news.
Back in May, 2013 (15 months ago) the Dow was out of its recession doldrums and hitting new highs. I asked readers if Obama could, economically, be the best modern President? Through discussion of that question, the number one issue raised by readers was whether the stock market was a good economic barometer for judging “best.” Many complained that the measure they were watching was jobs – and that too many people were still looking for work.
To put this week’s jobs report in economic perspective I reached out to Bob Deitrick, CEO of Polaris Financial Partners and author of Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box (which I profiled in October, 2012 just before the election) for some explanation. Since then Polaris’ investor newsletters have consistently been the best predictor of economic performance. Better than all the major investment houses.
This is the best private sector jobs creation performance in American history
Back in May, 2013 (15 months ago) the Dow was out of its recession doldrums and hitting new highs. I asked readers if Obama could, economically, be the best modern President? Through discussion of that question, the number one issue raised by readers was whether the stock market was a good economic barometer for judging “best.” Many complained that the measure they were watching was jobs – and that too many people were still looking for work.
To put this week’s jobs report in economic perspective I reached out to Bob Deitrick, CEO of Polaris Financial Partners and author of Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box (which I profiled in October, 2012 just before the election) for some explanation. Since then Polaris’ investor newsletters have consistently been the best predictor of economic performance. Better than all the major investment houses.
”President Reagan has long been considered the best modern economic President. So we compared his performance dealing with the oil-induced recession of the 1980s with that of President Obama and his performance during this ‘Great Recession.’
“As this unemployment chart shows, President Obama’s job creation kept unemployment from peaking at as high a level as President Reagan, and promoted people into the workforce faster than President Reagan.
“President Obama has achieved a 6.1% unemployment rate in his sixth year, fully one year faster than President Reagan did. At this point in his presidency, President Reagan was still struggling with 7.1% unemployment, and he did not reach into the mid-low 6% range for another full year. So, despite today’s number, the Obama administration has still done considerably better at job creating and reducing unemployment than did the Reagan administration.
“We forecast unemployment will fall to around 5.4% by summer, 2015. A rate President Reagan was unable to achieve during his two terms.”
What about the Labor Participation Rate?
Much has been made about the poor results of the labor participation rate, which has shown more stubborn recalcitrance as this rate remains higher even as jobs have grown.
oo1 pic
“The labor participation rate adds in jobless part time workers and those in marginal work situations with those seeking full time work. This is not a “hidden” unemployment. It is a measure tracked since 1900 and called ‘U6.’ today by the BLS.
“As this chart shows, the difference between reported unemployment and all unemployment – including those on the fringe of the workforce – has remained pretty constant since 1994.
002 pic
Labor participation is affected much less by short-term job creation, and much more by long-term demographic trends. As this chart from the BLS shows, as the Baby Boomers entered the workforce and societal acceptance of women working changed, labor participation grew.
“Now that ‘Boomers’ are retiring we are seeing the percentage of those seeking employment decline. This has nothing to do with job availability, and everything to do with a highly predictable aging demographic.
“What’s now clear is that the Obama administration policies have outperformed the Reagan administration policies for job creation and unemployment reduction. Even though Reagan had the benefit of a growing Boomer class to ignite economic growth, while Obama has been ****** to deal with a retiring workforce developing special needs. During the eight years preceding Obama there was a net reduction in jobs in America. We now are rapidly moving toward higher, sustainable jobs growth.”
Economic growth, including manufacturing, is driving jobs
When President Obama took office America was gripped in an offshoring boom, started years earlier, pushing jobs to the developing world. Manufacturing was declining in America, and plants were closing across the nation.
This week the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) released its manufacturing report, and it surprised nearly everyone. The latest Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) scored 59, two points higher than July and about that much higher than prognosticators expected. This represents 63 straight months of economic expansion, and 25 consecutive months of manufacturing expansion.
New orders were up 3.3 points to 66.7, with 15 consecutive months of improvement and reaching the highest level since April, 2004 – five years prior to Obama becoming President. Not surprisingly, this economic growth provided for 14 consecutive months of improvement in the employment index. Meaning that the “grass roots” economy made its turn for the better just as the DJIA was reaching those highs back in 2013 – demonstrating that index is still the leading indicator for jobs that it has famously always been.
As the last 15 months have proven, jobs and economy are improving, and investors are benefiting
The stock market has converted the long-term growth in jobs and GDP into additional gains for investors. Recently the S&P has crested 2,000 – reaching new all time highs. Gains made by investors earlier in the Obama administration have further grown, helping businesses raise capital and improving the nest eggs of almost all Americans. And laying the foundation for recent, and prolonged job growth.
003 pic
While most Americans think they are not involved with the stock market, truthfully they are. Via their 401K, pension plan and employer savings accounts 2/3 of Americans have a clear vested interest in stock performance.
“As this chart shows, over the first 67 months of their presidencies there is a clear “winner” from an investor’s viewpoint. A dollar invested when Reagan assumed the presidency would have yielded a staggering 190% return. Such returns were unheard of prior to his leadership.
“However, it is undeniable that President Obama has surpassed the previous president. Investors have gained a remarkable 220% over the last 5.5 years! This level of investor growth is unprecedented by any administration, and has proven quite beneficial for everyone.
“In 2009, with pension funds underfunded and most private retirement accounts savaged by the financial meltdown and Wall Street losses, Boomers and Seniors were resigned to never retiring. The nest egg appeared gone, leaving the ‘chickens’ to keep working. But now that the coffers have been reloaded increasingly people age 55 – 70 are happily discovering they can quit their old jobs and spend time with family, relax, enjoy hobbies or start new at-home businesses from their laptops or tablets. It is due to a skyrocketing stock market that people can now pursue these dreams and reduce the labor participation rates for ‘better pastures.”
Obama Outperforms Reagan On Jobs, Growth And Investing
Conventional wisdom is that President Obama has not created jobs, or grown the economy. But data shows he has outperformed President Reagan, and every other modern president
www.forbes.com
FUN FACT: More net jobs have been created under Obama than both Bushes combined
Obama: Since 2009, U.S. has created more jobs than 'every other advanced economy combined'
Obama: Since 2009, U.S. has created more jobs than 'every other advanced economy combined'
America’s labor market is creeping back to pre-recession levels, and President Barack Obama says its growth has surpasse
www.politifact.com
64 Straight Months Of Private Sector Job Growth
I ran a company in those 8 years they sucked
that's just it....people can't spend what they don't have...…..one of the reasons trump wanted to lower interest rates on your credit card.....doesn't help anything but numbers for a little while
facts are what they are...besides want a list of all the small biz bills your party killed under Obama
Bills That Republicans Have Blocked Since Obama Took ...
https://forum.grasscity.com/threads...have-blocked-since-obama-took-office.1130761/ · Jul 18, 2019
The Party of No: New Details on the GOP Plot to ... - TIME.com
swampland.time.com/.../08/23/the-party-of-no-new-details-on-the-gop-plot-to-obstruct-obama
Aug 23, 2012 · It reveals some of my reporting on the Republican plot to obstruct President Obama before he even took office, including secret meetings led by House GOP whip Eric Cantor (in December 2008) and Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell (in early January 2009) in which they laid out their daring (though cynical and political) no-honeymoon strategy of all-out resistance to a popular President-elect …
Im telling you facts what you have are fabrication
Similar threads
