You're not only an idiot, you're homophobic.
I'm curious if you're even from the United States. Because many foreigners have opinions on our political system when they have no business sticking their nose in it. But you're too much of a coward to reply.
You fucking moron, I didn't say there was an example of it. I'm saying it's possible.
I'll break it down to a third grade level so you can understand it. California has been a Democrat state since 1992. All 55 electoral college votes went to Hillary, despite Trump getting 4.4 million votes there in 2016.
Let's say, for the sake of argument, all Republicans in CA decided not to cast a vote in 2016.
Trump would have had 4.4 million fewer popular votes, but the electoral college votes wouldn't change at all. CA is still only worth 55, no matter how big the margin of victory is in that state.
So if I took ALL blue states from 2016 and threw away their Republican votes altogether, the Electoral College numbers would be the exact same.
Trump could have lost by a margin of 25 million (and even more) popular votes, but still won the election via the Electoral College.
State | Votes for Trump in blue states where Hillary won all Electoral College votes |
CA | 4,483,810 |
CO | 1,202,484 |
CT | 673,215 |
DE | 185,127 |
DC | 12,723 |
HI | 128,847 |
IL | 2,146,015 |
ME | 335,593 |
MD | 943,169 |
MA | 1,090,893 |
MN | 1,322,951 |
NV | 512,058 |
NH | 345,790 |
NJ | 1,601,933 |
NM | 319,667 |
NY | 2,819,534 |
OR | 782,403 |
RI | 180,543 |
VT | 95,369 |
VA | 1,769,443 |
WA | 1,221,747 |
Total | 22,173,314 |
So I take his 2016 total popular votes of 62,984,828, and subtract 22,173,314, and we get 40,811,514 popular votes that Trump had across all red states, and he still would have won the Electoral College 304 to 227.
It's a pretty simple concept. Maybe you'll understand it this time, but I'm not holding my breath.