I am better off knowing I would be alot more upset if the information released was made up. If they had Trumps tac return you wouldn't look
From Title 52-I am better off knowing I would be alot more upset if the information released was made up. If they had Trumps tac return you wouldn't look
I am better off knowing I would be alot more upset if the information released was made up. If they had Trumps tac return you wouldn't look
They never denied anything just furious it came out I never said it was right only it wasn't liesAnd what exactly did the Russians leak, that was true, in your estimation?
They never denied anything just furious it came out I never said it was right only it wasn't liesAnd what exactly did the Russians leak, that was true, in your estimation?
So what was revealed?They never denied anything just furious it came out I never said it was right only it wasn't lies
And what did they leak?I said i would be more upset if they made things up instead of leaking information.
So since it "wasn't made up," you are OK with Russia doing this?I said i would be more upset if they made things up instead of leaking information.
"They were on both sides". I don't follow you here? What do you mean?I never said i was ok with it I raised my right hand and swore to protect this nation from all enemy both foreign and domestic . IN MY EYES THEY WERE ON BOTH SIDES
It appeared to me you were trying to rationalize the interference when you asked me if I would look at Trump's tax returns if the Russians offered it.I never said i was ok with it I raised my right hand and swore to protect this nation from all enemy both foreign and domestic . IN MY EYES THEY WERE ON BOTH SIDES
So Russian interference was acceptable because it hurt HRC's campaign?No but both harmful to the nation