Well, first we "need" them to defend against a government trying to take our rights, including the 2nd amendment.
.... So, what you're saying here is that if Congress declares rifles such as AR-15 and the AK-47 illegal, not only will you NOT turn in your rifles of these and similar types, but that you'll basically declare your independence and ******* those, including military personnel, who request you to surrender those type guns? Can you manage to answer that with a
Yes or No before babbling your response?
Besides, they won't come take your AR-15s, TwoBi, if the ammunition to those rifles was outlawed, what good would the guns be without ammo?
Also, people don't "need" others or government telling people how they can live, what they can own, or what people can say. People only "need" to be held accountable for their actions yes, but just because they own an AR-15 doesn't make them a killer. Taking peoples AR-15's becasue they "could" harm someone is no different that cutting off your penis becasue you "could" ******* someone.
.... Such a novel response,
TwoBi. I can agree that most owners of the AR-15 have honorable intentions, however, that doesn't protect me & mine from those irresponsible gun owners who sell or lose their AR-15s from theft, etc. Unlike my penis, which I manage and doubt it could be stolen from me without my knowledge, a rifle such as that AR-15 very possibly could be stolen. Not only THAT, but you can't predict your mental state a year or five down the road. Plus, there's really no need for the AR-15 and its powerful ammunition
EXCEPT for killing people. So, if the government allowed you to keep those rifles, why else would you need the guns for anything other than killing people THAT any other type of less powerful gun could not accomplish similarly?
.... You said
"it isn't FAIR" ... and I gave you similar examples of unfairness that the Republicans and Trump have done but you rightards avoid mentioning and avoid any discussion of ... in fact many of you agree with their actions.
The rest of your post is just more deflection. The discussion is about how the left DOES want to eradicate the 2nd. If you wish to discuss the failed Obamacare, start a new post.
.... I have not heard that the Democrats wish to eradicate the 2nd amendment. No doubt many parts of our constitution need modernized, however, eradication I have not heard ... who is talking about that? Or is this more conservative alt-facts you spew to create havoc, AGAIN?
.... As far as my concern for my family, listen up, meathead, my wife & ******* are the most important things in my life. I'm not using them as a form of deflection, in fact, its because of them I view the Right To Bear Arms with a bit more common sense than you obviously do.
Mac