Politics, Politics, Politics

Current GOP Repeal Bill is Worst GOP Repeal Bill Yet


1.jpg

With 3 weeks until the clock runs out on the GOP’s ability to repeal health care through partisan repeal, Republicans are scheming to ram through another secretly drafted plan — but this one might be their worst one yet. Senators have repeatedly promised an open process with “regular order” to allow for expert testimony, debate and amendments before passing a health care repeal, but this scheme was drafted in secret and may be rammed through at the last minute. In fact, Ohio Republican Governor John Kasich said last week that he opposes this plan, calling it an “eleventh hour” attempt at repeal, and in a bipartisan Senate hearing Massachusetts Republican Governor Charlie Baker said the plan would result in “dramatically negative” effects in his state. ...
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/a45f26cd-9a02-3a56-be86-3d4b690116c8/ss_current-gop-repeal-bill-is.html
 
Now we’ve got solar flares.


The International Space Station (ISS) crew had to hide in a special shelter during a massive solar flare, a nuclear scientist said. The sun produced several huge solar flares last week, one of which was the strongest observed in a decade.

“Yesterday [on Sunday], the cosmonauts on the ISS received an ‘alert’ signal, and they had to seek a temporary shelter at the station,” Mikhail Panasyuk, the head of Skobeltsyn Institute Of Nuclear Physics in Moscow, said at a press conference.

On Sunday, a solar flare was reported by scientists across the globe. Called X8.2, it “produced a rapid increase in relativistic proton levels,” according to NASA.

The increase in proton activity coincided with a time at which the ISS was nearer the sun, according to Panasyuk. The proton stream was higher than that of the powerful solar flare that took place on September 7, he said.

“A powerful proton stream can break through ISS shell,” he added.

Solar flares are huge bursts of radiation released by the sun. The Earth’s atmosphere protects us from the worst effects of the resulting radiation storms, but if the flare is big enough, it can disrupt GPS satellites, certain radio frequencies and other global communications temporarily.

Earlier in September, the sun shot out at least six solar flares, according to NASA data. Global communications and some GPS systems were temporarily affected on the side of the Earth facing the sun at that time.

One of the flares was an X9.3, over four times as powerful as the first and largest solar flare in the current 11-year solar cycle that began in December 2008, according to NASA.

X-class solar flares are the largest explosions that take place within our solar system, shooting out jets of plasma that can reach up to 10 times the size of the Earth in length.

But these gigantic solar flares allegedly have nothing to do with the weather on earth.
 
they are proving their inability to govern and want to blame it on Trump?
they haven't been unified in a long time and it is growing



Republicans jumping ship amid dissatisfaction in Trump era
Associated Press ERICA WERNER and THOMAS BEAUMONT

Veteran Republicans are bailing on Congress in growing numbers, as GOP control of Washington fails to produce the unity or legislative successes party leaders wish for. With President Donald Trump willing, if not eager, to buck fellow Republicans and even directly attack them, a number of lawmakers no longer wish to be involved.

The latest was two-term Rep. Dave Trott of Michigan, who said in a statement Monday that he'd decided after careful consideration that the best course for him was to spend more time with his family and return to the private sector.

In contrast to those diplomatic words was Trott's most recent tweet, sent in mid-August: "I think America needs more unity and less divisiveness...meaning @realDonaldTrump should focus more on golf & have less press conferences."

Trott joins a string of moderate Republicans, including Reps. Charlie Dent of Pennsylvania, Dave Reichert of Washington state and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen of Florida, who are not seeking re-election.

Each of these seats will be heavily contested by Democrats eager to take back control of the House, and rumors abound of other GOP retirements still to come. New Jersey's Leonard Lance is weighing retirement, while another Michigan Republican, Rep. Fred Upton, is mulling a campaign for U.S. Senate, according to party operatives who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations.

Also Monday a senior GOP senator, Bob Corker of Tennessee, issued a statement indicating indecision about his future following a CNN report stating that the influential chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee had not yet decided whether to seek re-election next year.

"It's not an automatic for me. It just isn't," Corker told reporters, although he added that as chairman he has "a lot of impact without passing legislation. I can influence things. This is more about just what I believe to be the right thing to do."

Although Republicans are hopeful Corker ultimately will decide to run — he already has $7.5 million in his campaign account — the senator was in Trump's Twitter cross-hairs in August after criticizing the president's response to the racially motivated protests in Charlottesville.

"Tennessee not happy!" the president declared after claiming that Corker was "constantly" asking him whether or not he should run again next year.

The developments have alarmed GOP operatives concerned that the trickle of retirements could turn into a flood unless congressional Republicans and Trump can come together and produce on their promises, particularly by overhauling the tax code. And, with Trump bypassing Republicans to make deals with Democrats, and encouraging primary challenges against sitting GOP senators, the retirement decisions also reflect concerns among some about whether they will get party support when they need it, especially with former Trump adviser Steve Bannon threatening all-out war on congressional leadership.


"There are some stability concerns in the party about whose team everyone is on," said Josh Holmes, a GOP consultant and former chief of staff to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. "Concerns about whether your party is really with you."

It all illustrates that, far from producing unity within the Republican Party, the Trump era appears to be exacerbating existing GOP divisions while creating new ones. The familiar divide between pragmatic and ideologically driven Republicans has been heightened, while Trump's deal-making with top Democrats last week is forsing elected Republicans to choose sides between Trump and GOP leaders McConnell and House Speaker Paul Ryan.

"The party never united around Trump as it would another nominee, let alone president, and Trump is not a limited government conservative," said Alex Conant, a former top aide to Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla. "And so he is not a traditional Republican and as a result is going to clash with the traditional Republicans that fill the ranks of Congress."

The chaos and uncertainty produced by Trump and his orbit would be more acceptable to congressional Republicans if the party was achieving legislative success. Instead, its long-standing promise to repeal and replace Barack Obama's health care law collapsed on the Senate floor in July, while other priorities are moving slowly. As a result, a number of Republicans on and off Capitol Hill have come to view tax reform of some kind as a must-pass priority, without which the dam would likely break on retirements and Republicans would be in serious jeopardy of losing control of the House.

"Republicans need to put points on the board, to deliver and show they are getting something done," said Tom Reynolds, a former New York congressman who once chaired the National Republican Congressional Committee and is now a lobbyist.

Yet despite enthusiasm among Republicans, any final tax plan is a long way off, and many analysts are already predicting that Republicans will end up settling for some tax cuts that add to the deficit rather than full-blown reform.

For their part, Democrats are projecting increased confidence about their prospects in next year's midterms, especially in the House, where they must gain 24 seats to win the majority. Republicans have a 240-194 edge, with one vacancy. Democrats have their highest hopes pinned on the 23 districts where GOP House candidates won last year, as did Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi pointed to Trump's overall approval rating nationally, which has dipped below 40 percent.

"There's probably nothing more dispositive of who wins next year's elections than where the president stands a year before," Pelosi, D-Calif., told reporters Friday. "The year is fraught with meaning because that's when people decide whether to run or not, and that really is a timetable that's very important to us, and very positive for us right now."

Beaumont reported from Des Moines, Iowa. Associated Press writer Richard Lardner contributed to this report.
 
all the more reason I am sold on abortions and NOT forsing women to have children they don't want

Listening to the local news this morning ..
a 5 year old rushed to the hospital suffering from malnutrition and etc....5years old and weighed 19lbs!

Tulsa Mom Charged With baby Neglect Pleads Guilty

http://www.newson6.com/story/36343440/tulsa-mom-charged-with-baby-neglect-pleads-guilty
 
Last edited:
all the more reason I am sold on abortions and NOT forsing women to have children they don't want

I don't agree to forsing them to have unwanted children either - but when used as a form of birth control, there needs to be repercussions - It's called personal responsibility. The "choice" should come BEFORE one spreads their legs - not after. Getting pregnant is called "consequences to your actions". I'll even agree to every women having 1 "free-be", accidents happen, but after that they need to be fixed, community service or something. Make them do 500 hours with orphaned children or homeless shelters - the ******* too, they are just as responsible, or at least should be.
 
I don't agree to forsing them to have unwanted children either - but when used as a form of birth control, there needs to be repercussions

I will go along with that.... not sure what the answer is... but forsing them to have a baby just creates problems for society usually

not long after that story was on came another... 2 year old supposedly fell off the bed... taken to hospital with serious injuries


the baby doesn't get decent care and grows up a problem baby where we as a society end up paying one way or the other....not counting the abuse the baby goes through just getting to becoming an adult


I don't know how much it goes on elsewhere but this redneck state...every morning someone shot or baby abuse...every morning....last night they had a big special on local news that was an hour long about how this state is in the bottom of every health care category there is.... after that little deal they went into our education system and we are at the bottom there also!
and yet everyone hardcore republicans because they don't want their taxes raised... go figure
 
Last edited:
Current GOP Repeal Bill is Worst GOP Repeal Bill Yet


View attachment 1444807

With 3 weeks until the clock runs out on the GOP’s ability to repeal health care through partisan repeal, Republicans are scheming to ram through another secretly drafted plan — but this one might be their worst one yet. Senators have repeatedly promised an open process with “regular order” to allow for expert testimony, debate and amendments before passing a health care repeal, but this scheme was drafted in secret and may be rammed through at the last minute. In fact, Ohio Republican Governor John Kasich said last week that he opposes this plan, calling it an “eleventh hour” attempt at repeal, and in a bipartisan Senate hearing Massachusetts Republican Governor Charlie Baker said the plan would result in “dramatically negative” effects in his state. ...
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/a45f26cd-9a02-3a56-be86-3d4b690116c8/ss_current-gop-repeal-bill-is.html
All that's going on now is Obamacare version 2. I always like the "expert testimony". I can get experts that will tell you the earth is flat. I can get experts that will yell us the earth is only a few thousand years old

I think at some point quite possibly sooner than you think a single payer system will go into effect.

I had lunch the other day with a couple that are closing down their business. The reason? Health care costs. Pushing the business to profitability while paying the cost of healthcare just wasn't feasible. I wonder how many small businesses ACA has done that to
 
Last edited:
well HH looks like your man is not doing any better on the federal level than he did on the state level

Kris Kobach watches his voter fraud lie get fact-checked. It didn’t go well.
thinkprogress.org

Several Democratic voting experts including New Hampshire’s secretary of state on Tuesday repudiated White House voting commission co-chair Kris Kobach’s claim that thousands of out-of-state voters in New Hampshire likely tipped the Senate race to Democrats. Kobach acknowledged he should have hedged his wording, but did not admit he was wrong. In a Breitbart column last week, Kobach claimed that he had definitive proof that more than 5,000 out-of-state voters cast fraudulent ballots in 2016, tipping the Senate and potentially presidential race to Democrats. During the second meeting of his voting commission in New Hampshire Tuesday, Kobach called his evidence “anecdotal” and said he’s not sure ...
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/1aaf97...e4119fc/ss_kris-kobach-watches-his-voter.html
 
The Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Small Business

Whereas large corporations typically self-insure - paying their employees' medical bills and hiring insurers to administer health benefits - small businesses purchase group health coverage from insurers and face cost-increasing regulations as they go through the annual ritual of renewing their coverage. Over the next few years, as regulations and mandates are finally implemented, Obamacare will affect how businesses operate - including hiring, employee compensation, growth and so forth.

The Mandate on Employers. Though media attention has focused on the federal and state health exchanges, much of the burden of complying with the Affordable Care Act will fall on business. Nearly two-thirds of Americans with health coverage have employer-sponsored health insurance - approximately 171 million people.

Health benefits are a significant expense for U.S. employers and a substantial portion of workers' total compensation. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the required coverage for an individual will cost $5,800 a year or more in 2016 - the equivalent of an additional $3 an hour "minimum health wage." Family coverage could cost more than twice that amount. For instance:

The cost of employee health benefits averages $2.70 per hour, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, representing 8.5 percent of private industry workers' total compensation.

The Kaiser Family Foundation's annual survey of employer health benefits found the average cost of an employee family plan was $16,351 in 2013.

The ACA includes an employer mandate designed to ******* firms to provide full-time employees with comprehensive health insurance. Enforcement of the mandate has been delayed until 2015 for employers with more than 99 full-time employees. Firms employing from 50 to 99 full-time workers have until 2016 to comply. Businesses with fewer than 50 employees will not be penalized. Employers are also required to limit the amount of premiums some employees pay as a percentage of their wage income. For example, health plans are considered "unaffordable" if workers earning less than 400 percent of the federal poverty level (about $46,680 for an individual) must pay a premium that is more than 9.5 percent of their income.

Health Insurance Mandate on Firms with 50 or More Employees. Employers with fewer than 50 full-time workers are exempt from penalties. The fiftieth worker, however, could be a very expensive hire. Firms that employ 50 or more workers and don't provide health insurance will be subject to a tax penalty of $2,000 for each uninsured employee beyond the first 30.

Furthermore, firms with 50 or more workers will be required to contribute at least 60 percent of the cost for individual minimum essential coverage.

Grandfathered" Health Insurance Plans. Many small firms were able avoid the costly mandated benefits and new regulations by renewing less-expensive (non-conforming) coverage prior to January 2014. When these plans expire in 2014, firms will be ****** to purchase more highly regulated plans.

In theory, firms could retain their current health plan by claiming "grandfathered" status, insulating employers from cost-increasing regulatory burdens. However, only a few small businesses will have grandfathered plans. The status is lost if a firm makes any substantial plan change, such as switching to a new insurance carrier. According to official documents, two-thirds to as many as 80 percent of employer plans will likely lose their grandfathered status.

Effect of Obamacare on Premiums. The conse-quences for employers (and individual workers) who must purchase coverage are already becoming apparent. A 2014 survey of 148 insurance brokers by the investment firm Morgan Stanley found that rates in the small group market have risen substantially. For instance:

Premiums for firms renewing in 2014 jumped 11 percent in the small group market.

For firms with coverage through BlueCross, the year-over-year renewing contract premium hike is nearly 16 percent.

For individuals, the increase was similar - about 12 percent.

However, premium increases were much higher in some states than others. The survey found that since December 2012, rates for small employers grew 588 percent in Washington state, though this astounding increase is likely due to the small sample size and additional state regulations. Premiums rose 66 percent in Pennsylvania, 37 percent in California, 34 percent in Indiana, 30 percent in Kentucky and 29 percent in Colorado.

Employers Are Responding. Some employers are reducing their costs by passing on more of the cost to workers. Some employers are raising copayments for workers; others are boosting costs for dependent coverage, according to Mercer, a benefit consulting firm.

The Affordable Care Act is also affecting personnel decisions. A survey of more than 600 small business owners by the Society for Human Resource Management found that more than four-in-10 small business owners have delayed hiring due to uncertainty about the effects of the ACA. One in five reported they have cut the number of workers they employ. Employers are not required to offer coverage for employees who work less than 30 hours per week. Those employees are eligible for subsidized coverage in the health insurance exchange. Mercer reports that 12 percent of employers nationwide plan to reduce workers' hours as a result of Obamacare.

Introduction

Four years after President Barack Obama signed the Affordable Care Act (ACA) into law, there is still uncertainty regarding its effects, due to delays and exemptions granted by the Obama administration and challenges still pending in the courts. So far, however, there is plenty of evidence that the ACA, or Obamacare, is raising the cost of health insurance to employers and individuals.

The effects on business vary - by state, firm size and the composition of firms' workforces - but the impact on small businesses is especially acute. Whereas large corporations typically self-insure - paying their employees' medical bills and hiring insurers to administer health benefits - small businesses purchase group health coverage from insurers and face cost-increasing regulations as they go through the annual ritual of renewing their coverage. Over the next few years, as regulations and mandates are finally implemented, Obamacare will affect how businesses operate - including hiring, employee compensation, growth and so forth.

The Role of Employer-Sponsored Health Plans

Though media attention has focused on the federal and state health exchanges, employers are responsible for much of the growth in the number of insured. And much of the burden of complying with the Affordable Care Act will fall on business. From September 2013 to mid-March 2014, according to RAND Corporation estimates, a net 9.3 million Americans gained health coverage.1

The majority of the gains during this period came from employer-sponsored coverage: 8.2 million people enrolled in employer plans rather than purchasing individual coverage in an exchange.2 These new enrollees include individuals who previously declined employers' offers of insurance but are responding to the individual mandate to obtain coverage or face a tax penalty. Only 1.4 million were newly insured by exchange plans. (Though 3.9 million people enrolled in exchange plans, most were previously insured.)

Why Do Employers Provide Health Benefits? The practice of getting health coverage through the workplace began with a series of laws that originated during World War II.3 In a tight labor market with wage and price controls, the War Labor Board ruled wage controls did not apply to fringe benefits. Thus, employers could provide health coverage in lieu of higher cash wages.4 A few years later, in 1954, Congress and the Internal Revenue Service agreed that the value of health coverage provided by an employer could be excluded from taxable income.5 Today, as a result of this policy, most Americans get health insurance through work:

Nearly two-thirds of Americans with health coverage have employer-sponsored health insurance - approximately 171 million people.6

Slightly less than three-fourths (71 percent) of firms that employ 10 to 24 workers offered coverage in 2011.

In contrast, only 48 percent of firms employing three to nine workers offered coverage in 2011.7

The proportion of small employers offering health coverage has been declining for years. Under the Affordable Care Act, many firms will find it in their self-interest to abandon their company health plans.

Employer Costs for Health Insurance. Health benefits are a significant expense for U.S. employers and a substantial portion of workers' total compensation:

The cost of employee health benefits averages $2.70 per hour, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, representing 8.5 percent of private industry workers' total compensation.8

The Kaiser Family Foundation's annual survey of employer health benefits found the average cost of an employee family plan was $16,351 in 2013.9

Health benefits substitute nearly dollar-for-dollar for cash wages.

The Value of Employer-Provided Insurance Varies by Employees' Incomes. The cash value of excluding employee health coverage from taxable income is substantial. This is the major reason why most Americans have health coverage tied to their employment. For example:

To a middle-income couple with a marginal federal income tax rate of 25 percent, payroll taxes add another 15.3 percent and state and local taxes could add another 5 percent to their tax burden.

Thus, at an effective tax rate of 40 percent to 45 percent, the tax exclusion is worth nearly half the cost of coverage. For instance, a family in an employer health plan costing $16,351 would only experience a reduction in take home pay of $8,993 [$16,351 x (1-0.45)] - a tax savings of $7,358.

Furthermore, because the value of the tax subsidy increases with income, high-income families receive a greater benefit than low-income families. For instance, a family with an income of $150,000 or more receives about $4,436 in tax relief, compared to only about $147 for families earning less than $10,000 annually. [See Figure I.]
http://www.ncpa.org/pub/st356
 
It's starting..........


Democrats Flip State House Seats In 2 Districts That Trump Won By Double Digits
HuffPost Daniel Marans,HuffPost


Democrats won two GOP-held legislative seats in Oklahoma and New Hampshire on Tuesday, bringing the total number of state legislature seats the party has flipped since the November election to six.

The Democratic victory in Oklahoma was especially striking. Democrat Jacob Rosecrants, a 46-year-old schoolteacher, defeated Republican Darin Chambers, a businessman, by nearly 21 percentage points in a special election to represent District 46 in Oklahoma’s House of Representatives. The district encompasses part of the city of Norman, home of the University of Oklahoma.

Rosecrants had lost by a nearly identical margin in a previous race for the seat in November. The seat opened up, however, when Republican Scott Martin resigned to head the Norman Chamber of Commerce, prompting Tuesday’s special election.

The Democratic win was even more notable because President Donald Trump defeated Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton in the legislative district by over 10 percentage points.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/democrats-flip-state-house-seats-160414424.html
 
well looks like the "Bern" is going to introduce that today!
Before Obama took office he wrote a nice piece in health care. And it centered around a single payer system. However when he got to Washington he quickly figured out that the single payer wouldn't fly. The PPACA was written with very heavy input from the health care industry. Sanders was never really a contender so his socialized medicine went on the wayside. Obama's only real concern was to be credited with providing better health all it had to do was last until he was out of office and then the finger pointing could start. Things would have likely have worked better for PPACA but the healthcare industry and insurance companies saw this mandatory, government subsidized cash cow and got greedy. There were no real cost control. The limiting of profits on policies is an excellent incentive to raise rates. The expansion of Medicaid didn't go over well with a lot of states. In essence what PPACA ****** people to buy health care whether they wanted it or needed it. Some people got subsidies and the rest got dumped on the states.
 
It's starting..........


Democrats Flip State House Seats In 2 Districts That Trump Won By Double Digits
HuffPost Daniel Marans,HuffPost


Democrats won two GOP-held legislative seats in Oklahoma and New Hampshire on Tuesday, bringing the total number of state legislature seats the party has flipped since the November election to six.

The Democratic victory in Oklahoma was especially striking. Democrat Jacob Rosecrants, a 46-year-old schoolteacher, defeated Republican Darin Chambers, a businessman, by nearly 21 percentage points in a special election to represent District 46 in Oklahoma’s House of Representatives. The district encompasses part of the city of Norman, home of the University of Oklahoma.

Rosecrants had lost by a nearly identical margin in a previous race for the seat in November. The seat opened up, however, when Republican Scott Martin resigned to head the Norman Chamber of Commerce, prompting Tuesday’s special election.

The Democratic win was even more notable because President Donald Trump defeated Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton in the legislative district by over 10 percentage points.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/democrats-flip-state-house-seats-160414424.html
Democrats haven't done well U.S. Congressional special elections. A lot of state legislative seats are often more the person than the party they belong to. I am waiting rather impatiently for the 2018 midterms. In an ideal world the Democrats would gain little of nothing, and the Republicans would loose both houses to a third party. Now that would be the best possible thing for this country. The two main parties would be powerless to challenge a President they don't like. And before you start in about how much of a liar Trump is I have a rather large folder of lies and untruths that have been coming out of the mouths of president going back a number of years
 
Back
Top