We need to get serious with ISIS

bm, I thought I was quite clear, there, ... " Only reason so much is being made of international terrorists coming here is because it buys the Republicans a platform besides their Trickle Down ". And that IS the case ... they have no other platform to scare voters with ... they demonize everything Obama does, saying he's taking terrorism too lightly. International terrorism is only being dwelled heavily on by Republicans to scare people to believe Obama doesn't care and they need to be afraid of international terrorists.

I can appreciate your irritation to that source I used, but my intention was to draw attention to a bigger concern for home grown terrorists vs international terrorists, that's all. I could care less what color the perpetrators were ... if the writer of the article got something incorrect, my apologies, but terrorism in the US is growing and it isn't Muslims necessarily doing the killings ... they're US citizens pissed off at some faction of our government ... abortion clinics, etc.

By the way, this past Christmas week in my county of NC, we had 3 new murders by guns ... arrested, 4 black males, and one of the victims was a 3 year old baby, black girl, being held by her mom when the baby was struck and killed on Christmas EVE ... she died yesterday. They believe all 3 murders were ******* or gang related.
Mac

Domestic terrorism is international terrorism. Just the place is more localised
 
Domestic terrorists look, speak, and act like regular US citizens ... no accents, no skin shades, no noticeable body wear, etc. That's why they are harder to spot, AND, they usually have a localized agenda unrelated to religion. Abortion, Gun Laws, Party Affililations, Racial, etc .... its what WE as a country need to focus more on. These people are itching for excuses to fire their military weapons. We currently have a ton of polarized, pissed off citizens on various issues that mostly have been created by our useless politicians (both parties) in Washington.
Yes, we should take issue with International terrorists, but we can not vilify peace loving Muslims or the marginally and easily influenced with start siding with ISIS ... we must encourage peaceful Muslim HERE to start speaking out and getting involved... rallies, marches, etc. Americans need to see peaceful Muslims speaking out against these radical thugs.
 
Domestic terrorists look, speak, and act like regular US citizens ... no accents, no skin shades, no noticeable body wear, etc. That's why they are harder to spot, AND, they usually have a localized agenda unrelated to religion. Abortion, Gun Laws, Party Affililations, Racial, etc .... its what WE as a country need to focus more on. These people are itching for excuses to fire their military weapons.
Yes, we should take issue with International terrorists, but we can not vilify peace loving Muslims or the marginally and easily influenced with start siding with ISIS ... we must encourage peaceful Muslim HERE to start speaking out.


Hubby likes to say that Domestic terrorism is International terrorism just more localised.

The methods are usually those of any terrorist organisation, abet with a local flavour. i.e. Whilst there is a quantified difference between the two 'groups' the MO is basically the same. The one difference between the two are as you mentioned could be the inability to differentiate between the civilian population and 'well; the domestic terrorist. But wait a minute. Isn't that the difficulty already in placing who is a terrorist in general. After all I don't remember seeing any neon sign declaring them or anyone as an harbinger of death and destruction.

If the truth be told, if Europe had the same internal problem with 'Domestic terrorism to the extent the US has, I doubt many would have a conciliatory attitude towards certain stand points or views.

Concerning Muslim's and their belief. One rotten apple doesn't make a bad bunch. But right now that's one big apple making a whole bunch look bad. As I posted earlier, many of the Muslim faith want nothing to do with terrorism or Daesh and want to live their faith as they see fit. Who stands to gain from unsettling them is more the issue. That and the US, world sorting out the nutters hell bent on using violence to settle scores or making their point on the end of a weapon/bomb.
 
View attachment 732567
Let's hope not, BBB ... thanks for the sensible & well written contribution. Mac

I'll add a bit of statistical info regarding terrorist that I forgot, and actually one of the best:;
  • since 9-11 there have been 45 deaths due to Islamic terrorists in the US. The average number of deaths per year, due to lightening strikes is 51. Using these numbers, it appears that being struck by lightening is about 20X more likely than dying from a terrorist. That said, think about it ... how many of us are concerned about being struck by lightening? And the odds are even less with terrorist.


ps ... I certainly have my concerns with a people that hate us simply because of our own beliefs & ideologies, but I can't see sending our military over there (in HARM'S WAY again) until I see these peace loving Muslims standing up and vocally denouncing & disclaiming these terrorists and helping identify some of these radical. They know who a lot of them are, yet we've hardly heard a peep out of the Muslims here in the USA.

While I agree with the thoughts that we need to take care of our own and that a lack of opportunity can cause crime and even domestic terrorists, how do you explain the ******* who were handed everything on a silver platter and still turned to crime "for a thrill"?

Economic opportunity and education will not solve every one of these problems. I think we can solve a lot of them with a combination of things (better opportunity, better education, a MUCH better mental health system, and some other things, but we will never get rid of all the terrorists and criminals.

Mac, you say you can't see sending our military in harms way over there ... until you see peace loving muslims denouncing ...". Where would you rather fight them? On our soil mixed in among US Citizens with a high possibility of "collateral damage"? Or over there where US Citizens are generally not threatened? And if you don't want to send troops over to do the job we were doing before the troop reductions, how do you propose we solve the situation Before the terrorists get here to run amok? Diplomacy? Yeah, they sure respect that. Their tremendous respect for diplomacy was shown when they attacked the consulate in Benghazi (not being sarcastic at you, just at the idea of diplomacy working with these monsters.). I do agree that peaceful muslims around the world need to stand up much more and show their displeasure with ISIS, but I don't think that will happen.
 
Domestic terrorists explained ... exactly what I've been referring to. Only reason so much is being made of international terrorists coming here is because it buys the Republicans a platform besides their Trickle Down - tax cuts for the rich BS that they've held on with for 35 years. They know voters are waking up.

http://www.alternet.org/civil-liber...t-call-it-terrorism-if-perpetrators-are-white

ARE YOU REALLY FING SERIOUS???? Why don't you just say that Republicans created the terrorists overseas so they would have an international platform? Is your mind really that twisted? And yet you feel nothing for ridiculing me that I thought Jade Helm might possibly lead to a takeover of 9 western states. Talk about pot calling the kettle black.
 
Daphne/D (not sure which I am talking to),
Thank you so much for taking the time to post that well researched information. It made for very interesting reading and I learned a lot.

Only I post here :) Hubby supplied the know how to get these with his extensive experience and knowledge of these matters.
 
ARE YOU REALLY FING SERIOUS???? Why don't you just say that Republicans created the terrorists overseas so they would have an international platform? k.
OK, if you like ... the Republicans created the terrorists overseas ... and they ARE using the current terrorism as a political platform; watch the DEBATES. How's that? That plain enough English for you? Even Republicans now say that invading Iraq was a big mistake. In many countries, what Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld did would have resulted in their executions. We didn't even send the bastards to prison, courtesy of Obama ....one of the biggest mistakes he made, actually. It destabilized the entire region, and allowed the various terrorists groups to infest the territory. If Hussein were still dictator there, the region would probably be much more stable than it is now. Taking OUT dictators is not ALWAYS the best choice to make.
Yeah, go ahead, please, and blame Obama for pulling our troops out of Iraq too early ... no occupying country has a long history of success. We would still be fighting in Iraq & Afghanistan, another 10,000+ of our military would be dead, and our economy a wreck if it was not for the President ... thank GOD!

I hate to sound unpatriotic, but, the USA meddles in foreign affairs much more than they should. A democracy is NOT always the best form of government. Unfortunately some of our politicians think their way of ******* is the ONLY WAY.
 
Last edited:
OK, if you like ... the Republicans created the terrorists overseas ... and they ARE using the current terrorism as a political platform; watch the DEBATES. How's that? That plain enough English for you? Even Republicans now say that invading Iraq was a big mistake. In many countries, what Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld did would have resulted in their executions. We didn't even send the bastards to prison, courtesy of Obama ....one of the biggest mistakes he made, actually. It destabilized the entire region, and allowed the various terrorists groups to infest the territory. If Hussein were still dictator there, the region would probably be much more stable than it is now. Taking OUT dictators is not ALWAYS the best choice to make.
Yeah, go ahead, please, and blame Obama for pulling our troops out of Iraq too early ... no occupying country has a long history of success. We would still be fighting in Iraq & Afghanistan, another 10,000+ of our military would be dead, and our economy a wreck if it was not for the President ... thank GOD!

I hate to sound unpatriotic, but, the USA meddles in foreign affairs much more than they should. A democracy is NOT always the best form of government. Unfortunately some of our politicians think their way of ******* is the ONLY WAY.
Look, terrorists around the world hate us to the point that it doesnt matter if we meddle or not, they will find a reason to try and attack us.

Frankly i think we should be meddling as you call it. If not we end up with people like Hitler in the world. Usually the US meddling is done when it potentially affects the US or US interests around the world.

I would love for us to never set foot again in the middle east but its not a very realistic solution to keeping the US safe
 
Look, terrorists around the world hate us to the point that it doesnt matter if we meddle or not, they will find a reason to try and attack us.

Frankly i think we should be meddling as you call it. If not we end up with people like Hitler in the world. Usually the US meddling is done when it potentially affects the US or US interests around the world.

I would love for us to never set foot again in the middle east but its not a very realistic solution to keeping the US safe

That isn't necessarily true.

You have to see things from a different angle than just saying terrorists hate the US. What type of terrorism do you mean? What is a terrorist? What has made them resort to terrorism? Is it religious? Is it foreign policy related, perceived interference in their domestic affairs,International affairs?

One countries meddling is another countries foreign policy. But US foreign policy cannot dictate who runs what country and interfere because they don't like the person (nor can any other for that matter). You mentioned meddling when it effects the US interests. That's a bit naive when the very country the US says is their sphere of interest tells the world they do not want or need the US's help (or meddling). That said. Nothing is black and white nor simple and certainly is something that needs to be discussed more deeply.
 
That isn't necessarily true.

You have to see things from a different angle than just saying terrorists hate the US. What type of terrorism do you mean? What is a terrorist? What has made them resort to terrorism? Is it religious? Is it foreign policy related, perceived interference in their domestic affairs,International affairs?

One countries meddling is another countries foreign policy. But US foreign policy cannot dictate who runs what country and interfere because they don't like the person (nor can any other for that matter). You mentioned meddling when it effects the US interests. That's a bit naive when the very country the US says is their sphere of interest tells the world they do not want or need the US's help (or meddling). That said. Nothing is black and white nor simple and certainly is something that needs to be discussed more deeply.
They do hate us and everything america stands for. By Terrorist i mean radical islamic Terrorists and yes they will always claim its foreign policy or religous related.

No we cannot dictate who runs what country because we dont like them but we sure as hell better be prepared to fight them when it comes to that because if for instance we completely pull out of the middle east and let it run itself it would turn into a disaster, way worse than it already is then we will right back over there with troops on the ground.

If the world ignores the middle east it will turn into a mess that our children will have to deal with down the road. I would be glad to see more countries step up to help but unfortunately the US always seems to have to lead the way.
 
That's the thing Alanm. The US ( as in its citizens) feels everyone does, in reality its a whole different view.

Top 10 Excuses People Use To Hate America

Listverse Staff May 13, 2009

It is a very easy thing to hate the United States of America right now. But why? We stormed the beaches at Normandy, saved Europe from economic ruin with the Marshall plan (thanks for paying off the loan, Norway. Anybody else? Anybody? Bueller?), invented the Internet, uprooted tyrants, and give foreign aid away like it was candy. We want to be the good guys and thought we were. Yet we just can’t seem to get any love these days. How’d we get here? Well… [JFrater: as the representative of Listverse, I would like to say that we don’t hate America – in fact, I had one of my greatest holidays there. This list will no doubt cause a storm – be calm and debate nicely!]

10
Center of the Universe


The first reason: we act like the world revolves around us. America presumes much for a country generously dated at 300 years old. China has latrines ten times older than that. A quick example: many countries play baseball, but only we have the “World Series”. We’re getting better about our egocentrism, but it’s been a loooong time coming. And don’t get me started about our tourists. Just smile and take the money- they’re loud, but they’ll be gone in a week.


9
We Win Everything


Okay, I’ll concede Vietnam, tennis (but we don’t care) and Kenyan marathon runners. But we win damn near everything else, eventually. The Space Race. The Cold War. Tour de France. The list goes on and on. Even we hate the Olympics now that our professionals are allowed to participate straight up with the underaged/doping communist nations. It’s boring for us, but as a Red Sox/Bolton Wanderers fan, I know the angst that chronic losing against bigger and better funded opponents generates. And if we don’t have the best athletes/scientists/entertainers, we’ll make sure they get a chance to immigrate while others wait in line. That’s gotta sting. Oh, Yao Ming and Ichiro say “Hi”.

8
We Eat Everything


Why? Because we can. Americans are the second fattest industrialized nation per capita (sorry, Australia). But as always, we make up for it in volume. We can afford automobiles so we don’t ride bikes or walk anywhere except for fun, and thanks to abundant agricultural surpluses, ANYTHING we want to eat is readily available from takeaway restaurants and convenience stores. Some of our refrigerators could hide an entire human body. And we like the fatty stuff, because fat tastes good. This is NOT a good thing, and our global franchises (KFC, McDonald’s) are already infecting nations that traditionally had healthier diets (are you listening, Japan?)

7
We Made and Have Nukes


The United States is the inventor and only wartime practitioner of nuclear weapons (never mind that using them prevented an invasion that would make the Iraqi insurgency look like a blowjob. “Operation Downfall”, the now-declassified US plan to invade Japan, estimated 1 Million American casualties alone). Lax security protocols (and clever spying) spread the secret to the USSR and after that the genie got out of the bottle. Many countries now have atomic weapons, and with no clear Cold War counterpart to US supremacy, the balance has shifted, and the peace dividend has not been kind post 9/11.

6
Natural Resources


Though accounting for only 5 percent of the world’s population, Americans consume 26 percent of the world’s energy. (American Almanac), and we are the world’s largest single emitter of carbon dioxide, accounting for 23 percent of energy-related carbon emissions worldwide. (U.S. Department of Energy). This, while worldwide, some 2 billion people are currently without electricity. (U.S. Department of Energy). The good news is that among industrialized and developing countries, Canada consumes per capita the most energy in the world, and the United Sates is only second. Italy consumes the least among industrialized countries (that’s because they still drive Fiats, which “conserve” energy by breaking every other day).



5
International Meddling


The United States has the most advanced army in the world. We station our military in other countries at their “request”, which is a source of much seething and hurt national pride. From Banana Republics, to the Cold War, to the War on Terror, we routinely interfere in the business of other countries to make the world safe for our interests, whether anybody asked for it or not. Even if the intentions are both right and good, many countries resent our involvement in their affairs on sheer principle: they’d rather f*** it up themselves. Are you listening, North Korea?

4
We Export Trash Culture


A thriving market economy and near total freedom of expression liberate Americans to pursue almost every endeavor imaginable, resulting in some of the greatest discoveries and inventions in the history of man, from the first practical light bulb to powered flight, polio vaccines, radio and TV, space exploration, the Internet, and unfortunately, everything in between. So that means ubercrap like Jerry Springer and Britney Spears gets exported worldwide. No, I’m being too kind there– “******* fed” worldwide. Other cultures despise this with a mix of dread, envy, and loathing. They can’t figure out how to cull the good from the bad out of this torrent (neither can we, btw)—but once it takes hold, it won’t let go. This what the Islamic world fears most. Tanks, they understand. An educated, employed woman horny and clubbing on Friday night they simply can’t fathom. And it scares the crap out of them.

3
It’s Fashionable


Despite the hyperbole bandied online, strong political opinions won’t get your door kicked in at 3 AM like in the Gulag Archipelago. There are no Stalinist purges or killing fields here. And the FBI/CIA/ATF/DEA/PTA will not shoot you on sight simply because you speak against The Surge or march against the Economic Stimulus Plan. But it’s certainly fun to claim a fear of it! You become an instant radical and feel intellectually enlightened to boot– patriotism is an uncritical, reflexive act, right?– only a deep thinker would hate his country (yet stay on to enjoy its privileges). And don’t worry about proof, because all that matters is the accusation. Volume and conviction win the day, so toss that bibliography—grab half the story and make the rest up. If you get caught in a logic box, claim satire. Other countries see this lack of consequences and pile on.

2
We Don’t Finish the Job


From Vietnam to Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinski to “Mission Accomplished” in Iraq to finding Osama Bin Laden, we seem to do most of the work, but keep a lot of things hanging on, never quite finished. Eventually the answer makes itself known, but it usually takes time, and involves help from others after a lot of (necessary) heated discussions. Maybe we should try this as as a first course of action more often…

1
We Act Unilaterally


We are a nation of doers, and our errors (when they occur) will be from acts of commission, not omission (Hypocrisy Alert: Darfur). Sometimes that’s a great thing, like sending Kruschev’s missiles back home, breaking Gaddafi’s/Qaddafi’s/Kaddafi’s nuclear ambitions (his nukes are now safely tucked away in Oak Ridge, Tennessee), or winning the Cold War. Other times, it blows up in our (and often, YOUR) face. Our attempts to spread democracy worldwide, intended to let others enjoy the same freedoms and advantages that we have, sometimes result in innocent people dying. We must stop to remember the Somalia embassy, Madrid and Fiji and Lockerbie 101 bombings, along with the millions of nameless others who suffered and died in countries that are not free. The US is the biggest face opposing these things that actually does anything (not just talk, FRANCE. You railed about Guantanamo but when it came time to release prisoners you took ONE.), but our allies often bear the brunt of our “foreign” wars, because the enemy cannot reach us. That has changed recently, and while it has altered our perspective, it has not altered our resolve.
 
When asked, most people from other countries who claim they hate the US say they hate the US not specifically American's. You see, most Americans take it that hating the US is hating Americans. Not true. While some Americans abroad can be viewed as ignorant, arrogant and egocentric and self righteous by their behavior. The same can be said for many nations nationals who visit foreign places. Hell, look at the stink there is about Chinese tourists abroad.

I have had the good fortune to meet many visitors to my country, and yes while there are some downright rude and ignorant ones there are a lot more good natured, polite, helpful, and sincere than bad. And yes that includes Americans as well. So its not Americans people have a problem with. Just the policies and leadership decisions the US government makes and then tries to implement both domestically and Internationally. I've included a list of who hates America according to the 247wallst.com.
--------------------------------------------------------------


International approval of U.S. leadership improved last year, rising from of 41% in 2012 to 46% in 2013. This ended a downward trend in U.S. approval ratings, which had consistently declined since 2009.

While people around the world tended to have positive opinions of U.S. leadership, residents of some countries had a negative impression of the United States. In five nations, more than two-thirds of those surveyed disapproved of the current administration, according to the latest U.S.-Global Leadership Project, a partnership between Meridian International Center and Gallup.


Last year represented a major improvement for U.S. leadership, Ambassador Stuart Holliday, president and CEO of Meridian International Center, told 24/7 Wall St. There were several reasons for this, including a wind-down of America’s role in armed conflicts abroad. As a result, “The view that we are the major shapers of the world and our image as being the world’s policeman are fading,” Holliday said. An ongoing return to normalcy in the global economy, in which the United States plays an outsized role, has also helped, he added.

The United States has long-running political tensions with many nations that disapprove of the U.S. leadership. Among these is Iran, which has not had diplomatic relations with the U.S. since 1980, and whose nuclear ambitions and human rights violations are points of contention for the United States. In Pakistan, the U.S. has launched attacks against terrorists and insurgents inside the country. Most notable was the 2011 raid and killing of Osama bin Laden, which led to heightened tensions between the two nations.

Another potential reason for high disapproval of U.S. leadership is the relationship with Israel. The U.S. State Department notes America was the first country to recognize Israel in 1948, and that “Israel has become, and remains, America’s most reliable partner in the Middle East.” Countries with long-running disputes with Israel — such as Lebanon and the Palestinian territories — also disapprove of U.S. leadership.

Ambassador Holliday noted the situation in the Middle East is also influenced by a lack of clarity over U.S. policy goals and, to some extent, perceptions of the U.S. government’s support of Israel. This is driven in large part by a 24/7 news cycle that chronicles every twist and turn of the peace process, Holliday added.

Several of the countries that dislike American leadership the most have also undergone recent political upheavals. Mass demonstrations in Tunisia, for example, set the tone in 2011 for what came to be known as the Arab Spring. There has also been considerable political upheaval in Egypt following the ****** resignation and trial of President Hosni Mubarak in 2011. Mubarak was long considered a stable ally of the United States.

However, while it may be easy to conclude disapproval of U.S. leadership is largely limited to the Middle East and North Africa, this is not always the case. Most notably, in Slovenia, 57% of residents disapproved of U.S. leadership — despite the fact that the country is both a major ally in NATO and a member of the European Union.

But what Slovenia has in common with a number of other countries that disapprove of American leadership is the citizens’ negative opinion of their country’s government. In 2012, less than one-quarter of Slovenians had confidence in their own government, and a similar number lacked faith in their judicial system, lower than in the vast majority of the countries in the same region. Similarly, less than one-third of Pakistan and Iraq residents had confidence in their governments.

America’s strong economy may also provoke resentment among residents of these countries. According to Jon Clifton, Managing Director of the Gallup World Poll, residents of many of these countries experience hardship and do not enjoy the kind of broad economic benefits seen in more developed countries. As a result, residents equate “U.S. leadership and the leadership of whatever the current economic order represents for them.”

GDP per capita in four of the nine countries that hate America the most was less than $10,000 last year. By contrast, U.S. gross domestic product totaled more than $50,000 per capita in 2013.

Limited access to basic needs may also add to the misery of the citizens in many countries that disapprove of the United States the most. Just 31% of Iraqis were satisfied with the quality of their drinking water in 2012, less than any of the 16 other peer countries in the Middle East and North Africa. In Slovenia, only 24% of residents said they were satisfied with the availability of good, affordable housing. This was less than in all but one other OECD nation.

To determine the countries that hate America most, 24/7 Wall St. relied on data from The U.S.-Global Leadership Project, a partnership between Gallup and the Meridian International Center. Gallup also provided data from a number of other indices it produced through polling in 2012. Additional economic information and estimates, including unemployment data, came from the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) 2013 World Economic Outlook. IMF figures on GDP per capita are given at purchasing-power-parity in order to show real differences in wealth. Data on life expectancy was provided by The World Bank.

These are the countries that hate America most.



9. Tunisia
> Disapproval rating: 54.0%
> GDP per capita: $9,447 (90th highest)
> Unemployment: 16.7% (12th highest)
> Life expectancy: 75 years (tied for 47th highest)

Animosity towards the United States in Tunisia culminated in a 2012 ransacking of the U.S. embassy in Tunisia’s capital, Tunis, by Islamic radicals. The people of Tunisia took to the streets to protest their leadership and a high unemployment rate, which reached 18.3% in 2011. The attack on the U.S. embassy came roughly one year after the protesters succeeded in ousting the country’s then-president, Zine El-Abidine Ben Ali. Although the United States has been vocal in its support of democracy in Tunisia and has provided $400 million in financial aid to the country since 2011, more than half the population disapproves of U.S. leadership. As in many countries that have negative views of the United States, Tunisia’s economy is struggling and many of its people distrust the government. The vast majority of Tunisians believed that corruption was widespread throughout their government, according to a Gallup study in 2012, and only 20% believed the country’s economy was getting better.


8. Iran
> Disapproval rating: 56.0%
> GDP per capita: $12,804 (78th highest)
> Unemployment: 13.2% (18th highest)
> Life expectancy: 73 years (72nd highest)

Iran has long been at odds with the United States, most recently over Iran’s nuclear program. The two countries have not had diplomatic relations since 1980, when Iran took more than 50 Americans hostage at the U.S. embassy in Tehran. Additionally, policy analysts have credited European Union and U.S. sanctions for causing some of the country’s wide-ranging economic problems, with inflation among the chief concerns. Consumer prices in Iran rose 30.5% in 2012 and a world-leading 42.3% last year, according to IMF estimates. This had serious consequences for much of the population, just 53% of whom noted in 2012 they had enough money for shelter, the lowest of 17 countries in the region. Similarly, just 54% said they consistently had enough money for food that year, lower than all but one other peer nation. The effects of a poor economy may play a role in the residents’ distaste of America, with 56% disapproving of U.S. leadership.

7. Slovenia
> Disapproval rating: 57.0%
> GDP per capita: $27,417 (36th highest)
> Unemployment: 10.3% (33rd highest)
> Life expectancy: 80 years (tied for 23rd highest)

Slovenia — a former communist nation that separated from Yugoslavia in 1992 — has suffered from a years-long financial crisis. Fixing the country’s weak financial institutions has been enormously expensive, according to a 2013 report in the Economist. Gross government debt as a percentage of GDP rose from just 35% in 2009 to an estimated 71.5% last year. While the country has struggled to repair its financial system and return to economic growth, protests against corruption led to the ouster of Slovenia’s government last year. In 2012, less than a quarter of the population had confidence in their judicial system, worse than in all but one other country in the area. Among the nations with the highest disapproval ratings of U.S. leadership, Slovenia is unique in that it is a NATO member. The U.S. State Department also asserts the two nations have a strong relationship.

6. Egypt
> Disapproval rating: 57.0%
> GDP per capita: $6,553 (76th lowest)
> Unemployment: 13.0% (20th highest)
> Life expectancy: 71 years (82nd highest)

Gallup collected survey data in Egypt before the ousting of President Mohamed Morsi and prior to the U.S. aid cuts later in the year. More Egyptians may now disapprove of U.S. leadership than the 57% who disapproved at the time Gallup conducted the surveys in 2013. Political turmoil has continued to plague Egypt since protesters succeeded in overthrowing President Hosni Mubarak in 2011. Egyptian respondents frequently reported negative experiences — such as feeling sad, stressed, angry or experiencing physical pain. More than half said they were worried during much of the previous day in 2012, more than most other countries reviewed in the region. The U.S. Department of State currently advises U.S. citizens not to travel to Egypt due to instability and violence across the country.



5. Iraq
> Disapproval rating: 67.0%
> GDP per capita: $7,132 (79th lowest)
> Unemployment: N/A
> Life expectancy: 69 years (57th lowest)

The United States and Iraq have a long history of conflict. The Gulf War in 1991 was followed by the Iraq War, which began in 2003 and lasted until U.S. forces left Iraq in December 2011. Although the war has ended, the U.S. State Department warned that traveling to the country is extremely dangerous because of civil unrest and threat of kidnappings and terrorist attacks. The long-running presence of the U.S. military and the years of conflict, during which hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, including civilians, died have likely contributed to negative opinions of Americans. The new government has struggled since the war began. Many citizens disapprove of the regime of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, who was elected to office in 2010 under a free election overseen by the United States. As of 2012, however, Iraqis were less likely to express confidence in their national government, military or judicial system than citizens of peer nations, and just 30% believed their country had fair elections — lower than in any country in the region.


4. Yemen
> Disapproval rating: 69.0%
> GDP per capita: $2,348 (38th lowest)
> Unemployment: N/A
> Life expectancy: 63 years (38th lowest)

More than 100 Yemeni citizens have been detained at Guantanamo Bay over the years. The United States also has been concerned over terrorist activity in Yemen. It is therefore no surprise that the two countries have a strained relationship and that nearly 70% of survey respondents disapproved of U.S. leadership. Also, just 9% of Yemenite respondents approved of U.S. leadership, less than in any other country reviewed by Gallup. The country suffers from a very poor economy, with GDP per capita at just $2,348 last year, among the very lowest in the world. According to the World Bank, more than half of the country’s population lived in poverty as of 2012. U.S. citizens are currently under advisory from the U.S. State Department to avoid traveling to Yemen due to the extremely high security threat level.

3. Lebanon
> Disapproval rating: 71.0%
> GDP per capita: $15,832 (66th highest)
> Unemployment: N/A
> Life expectancy: 80 years (tied for 23rd highest)

Like many countries that disapprove of U.S. leadership, Lebanon has a long history of conflict with Israel. Hezbollah, a militant group and political party deemed a terrorist organization by the United States and European Union, has operated out of Lebanon for several decades. In February, Israeli forces bombed a Hezbollah convoy on the Syrian-Lebanese border. Hezbollah subsequently claimed responsibility for the roadside bombing of an Israeli patrol along the Lebanese-Israeli border in retaliation. The country is also strapped with debt. Its gross debt was nearly 143% of its GDP last year, the third highest in the world. According to a recent AP report, the country’s debt problem is compounded by corruption and a government unwilling to act. In 2012, 85% of residents stated that corruption was widespread, the most of any comparable country.

2. Pakistan
> Disapproval rating: 73.0%
> GDP per capita: $3,144 (48th lowest)
> Unemployment: 6.7% (47th lowest)
> Life expectancy: 66 (46th lowest)

While 73% of Pakistani respondents still disapproved of U.S. leadership in 2013, this was a six percentage points improvement over 2012. Relations with Pakistan have been tense since the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States by al-Qaeda. Shortly after the attacks, the U.S. made Pakistan the base of its operations in its hunt for al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden and the war on Afghanistan’s then-leadership, the Taliban. In 2009, a survey revealed that 59% of the Pakistani people viewed the United States as a bully and as a bigger threat than al-Qaeda. Further exacerbating the country’s negative view of the U.S. may be Pakistan’s struggling economy and poor governance. Just one in 10 Pakistanis said they lived comfortably on their incomes in 2012, according to Gallup, and only 23% of Pakistanis expressed confidence in their government.

1. Palestinian territories
> Disapproval rating: 80.0%
> GDP per capita: N/A
> Unemployment: N/A
> Life expectancy: 73 years (95th highest)

Four of five Palestinians disapproved of American leadership, by far the worst perception of the United States globally. One explanation for the country’s hostility toward the United States is Palestine’s conflict with Israel. Hamas, the organization that has effectively governed the Gaza Strip territory since 2007, is considered by the United States and European Union to be a terrorist organization. Possibly emphasizing the deep divides in the Palestinian territories, just 18% of respondents told Gallup the place they lived was a good place for racial and ethnic minorities in 2012, less than all but one other country in the region.

By Alexander E.M. Hess, Vince Calio and Thomas C. Frohlich


Read more: Nine Countries That Hate America Most - 24/7 Wall St. http://247wallst.com/special-report...tries-that-hate-america-most/3/#ixzz3vo86FwPP

As you can see there is an underlining tone and theme to part of the question being posed. Why do people hate the US. But its not the one you think it is.

I will post more later in reply to your comment.
 
When asked, most people from other countries who claim they hate the US say they hate the US not specifically American's. You see, most Americans take it that hating the US is hating Americans. Not true. While some Americans abroad can be viewed as ignorant, arrogant and egocentric and self righteous by their behavior. The same can be said for many nations nationals who visit foreign places. Hell, look at the stink there is about Chinese tourists abroad.

I have had the good fortune to meet many visitors to my country, and yes while there are some downright rude and ignorant ones there are a lot more good natured, polite, helpful, and sincere than bad. And yes that includes Americans as well. So its not Americans people have a problem with. Just the policies and leadership decisions the US government makes and then tries to implement both domestically and Internationally. I've included a list of who hates America according to the 247wallst.com.
--------------------------------------------------------------


International approval of U.S. leadership improved last year, rising from of 41% in 2012 to 46% in 2013. This ended a downward trend in U.S. approval ratings, which had consistently declined since 2009.

While people around the world tended to have positive opinions of U.S. leadership, residents of some countries had a negative impression of the United States. In five nations, more than two-thirds of those surveyed disapproved of the current administration, according to the latest U.S.-Global Leadership Project, a partnership between Meridian International Center and Gallup.


Last year represented a major improvement for U.S. leadership, Ambassador Stuart Holliday, president and CEO of Meridian International Center, told 24/7 Wall St. There were several reasons for this, including a wind-down of America’s role in armed conflicts abroad. As a result, “The view that we are the major shapers of the world and our image as being the world’s policeman are fading,” Holliday said. An ongoing return to normalcy in the global economy, in which the United States plays an outsized role, has also helped, he added.

The United States has long-running political tensions with many nations that disapprove of the U.S. leadership. Among these is Iran, which has not had diplomatic relations with the U.S. since 1980, and whose nuclear ambitions and human rights violations are points of contention for the United States. In Pakistan, the U.S. has launched attacks against terrorists and insurgents inside the country. Most notable was the 2011 raid and killing of Osama bin Laden, which led to heightened tensions between the two nations.

Another potential reason for high disapproval of U.S. leadership is the relationship with Israel. The U.S. State Department notes America was the first country to recognize Israel in 1948, and that “Israel has become, and remains, America’s most reliable partner in the Middle East.” Countries with long-running disputes with Israel — such as Lebanon and the Palestinian territories — also disapprove of U.S. leadership.

Ambassador Holliday noted the situation in the Middle East is also influenced by a lack of clarity over U.S. policy goals and, to some extent, perceptions of the U.S. government’s support of Israel. This is driven in large part by a 24/7 news cycle that chronicles every twist and turn of the peace process, Holliday added.

Several of the countries that dislike American leadership the most have also undergone recent political upheavals. Mass demonstrations in Tunisia, for example, set the tone in 2011 for what came to be known as the Arab Spring. There has also been considerable political upheaval in Egypt following the ****** resignation and trial of President Hosni Mubarak in 2011. Mubarak was long considered a stable ally of the United States.

However, while it may be easy to conclude disapproval of U.S. leadership is largely limited to the Middle East and North Africa, this is not always the case. Most notably, in Slovenia, 57% of residents disapproved of U.S. leadership — despite the fact that the country is both a major ally in NATO and a member of the European Union.

But what Slovenia has in common with a number of other countries that disapprove of American leadership is the citizens’ negative opinion of their country’s government. In 2012, less than one-quarter of Slovenians had confidence in their own government, and a similar number lacked faith in their judicial system, lower than in the vast majority of the countries in the same region. Similarly, less than one-third of Pakistan and Iraq residents had confidence in their governments.

America’s strong economy may also provoke resentment among residents of these countries. According to Jon Clifton, Managing Director of the Gallup World Poll, residents of many of these countries experience hardship and do not enjoy the kind of broad economic benefits seen in more developed countries. As a result, residents equate “U.S. leadership and the leadership of whatever the current economic order represents for them.”

GDP per capita in four of the nine countries that hate America the most was less than $10,000 last year. By contrast, U.S. gross domestic product totaled more than $50,000 per capita in 2013.

Limited access to basic needs may also add to the misery of the citizens in many countries that disapprove of the United States the most. Just 31% of Iraqis were satisfied with the quality of their drinking water in 2012, less than any of the 16 other peer countries in the Middle East and North Africa. In Slovenia, only 24% of residents said they were satisfied with the availability of good, affordable housing. This was less than in all but one other OECD nation.

To determine the countries that hate America most, 24/7 Wall St. relied on data from The U.S.-Global Leadership Project, a partnership between Gallup and the Meridian International Center. Gallup also provided data from a number of other indices it produced through polling in 2012. Additional economic information and estimates, including unemployment data, came from the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) 2013 World Economic Outlook. IMF figures on GDP per capita are given at purchasing-power-parity in order to show real differences in wealth. Data on life expectancy was provided by The World Bank.

These are the countries that hate America most.



9. Tunisia
> Disapproval rating: 54.0%
> GDP per capita: $9,447 (90th highest)
> Unemployment: 16.7% (12th highest)
> Life expectancy: 75 years (tied for 47th highest)

Animosity towards the United States in Tunisia culminated in a 2012 ransacking of the U.S. embassy in Tunisia’s capital, Tunis, by Islamic radicals. The people of Tunisia took to the streets to protest their leadership and a high unemployment rate, which reached 18.3% in 2011. The attack on the U.S. embassy came roughly one year after the protesters succeeded in ousting the country’s then-president, Zine El-Abidine Ben Ali. Although the United States has been vocal in its support of democracy in Tunisia and has provided $400 million in financial aid to the country since 2011, more than half the population disapproves of U.S. leadership. As in many countries that have negative views of the United States, Tunisia’s economy is struggling and many of its people distrust the government. The vast majority of Tunisians believed that corruption was widespread throughout their government, according to a Gallup study in 2012, and only 20% believed the country’s economy was getting better.


8. Iran
> Disapproval rating:
56.0%
> GDP per capita: $12,804 (78th highest)
> Unemployment: 13.2% (18th highest)
> Life expectancy: 73 years (72nd highest)

Iran has long been at odds with the United States, most recently over Iran’s nuclear program. The two countries have not had diplomatic relations since 1980, when Iran took more than 50 Americans hostage at the U.S. embassy in Tehran. Additionally, policy analysts have credited European Union and U.S. sanctions for causing some of the country’s wide-ranging economic problems, with inflation among the chief concerns. Consumer prices in Iran rose 30.5% in 2012 and a world-leading 42.3% last year, according to IMF estimates. This had serious consequences for much of the population, just 53% of whom noted in 2012 they had enough money for shelter, the lowest of 17 countries in the region. Similarly, just 54% said they consistently had enough money for food that year, lower than all but one other peer nation. The effects of a poor economy may play a role in the residents’ distaste of America, with 56% disapproving of U.S. leadership.

7. Slovenia
> Disapproval rating: 57.0%
> GDP per capita: $27,417 (36th highest)
> Unemployment: 10.3% (33rd highest)
> Life expectancy: 80 years (tied for 23rd highest)

Slovenia — a former communist nation that separated from Yugoslavia in 1992 — has suffered from a years-long financial crisis. Fixing the country’s weak financial institutions has been enormously expensive, according to a 2013 report in the Economist. Gross government debt as a percentage of GDP rose from just 35% in 2009 to an estimated 71.5% last year. While the country has struggled to repair its financial system and return to economic growth, protests against corruption led to the ouster of Slovenia’s government last year. In 2012, less than a quarter of the population had confidence in their judicial system, worse than in all but one other country in the area. Among the nations with the highest disapproval ratings of U.S. leadership, Slovenia is unique in that it is a NATO member. The U.S. State Department also asserts the two nations have a strong relationship.

6. Egypt
> Disapproval rating:
57.0%
> GDP per capita: $6,553 (76th lowest)
> Unemployment: 13.0% (20th highest)
> Life expectancy: 71 years (82nd highest)

Gallup collected survey data in Egypt before the ousting of President Mohamed Morsi and prior to the U.S. aid cuts later in the year. More Egyptians may now disapprove of U.S. leadership than the 57% who disapproved at the time Gallup conducted the surveys in 2013. Political turmoil has continued to plague Egypt since protesters succeeded in overthrowing President Hosni Mubarak in 2011. Egyptian respondents frequently reported negative experiences — such as feeling sad, stressed, angry or experiencing physical pain. More than half said they were worried during much of the previous day in 2012, more than most other countries reviewed in the region. The U.S. Department of State currently advises U.S. citizens not to travel to Egypt due to instability and violence across the country.



5. Iraq
> Disapproval rating:
67.0%
> GDP per capita: $7,132 (79th lowest)
> Unemployment: N/A
> Life expectancy: 69 years (57th lowest)

The United States and Iraq have a long history of conflict. The Gulf War in 1991 was followed by the Iraq War, which began in 2003 and lasted until U.S. forces left Iraq in December 2011. Although the war has ended, the U.S. State Department warned that traveling to the country is extremely dangerous because of civil unrest and threat of kidnappings and terrorist attacks. The long-running presence of the U.S. military and the years of conflict, during which hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, including civilians, died have likely contributed to negative opinions of Americans. The new government has struggled since the war began. Many citizens disapprove of the regime of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, who was elected to office in 2010 under a free election overseen by the United States. As of 2012, however, Iraqis were less likely to express confidence in their national government, military or judicial system than citizens of peer nations, and just 30% believed their country had fair elections — lower than in any country in the region.


4. Yemen
> Disapproval rating:
69.0%
> GDP per capita: $2,348 (38th lowest)
> Unemployment: N/A
> Life expectancy: 63 years (38th lowest)

More than 100 Yemeni citizens have been detained at Guantanamo Bay over the years. The United States also has been concerned over terrorist activity in Yemen. It is therefore no surprise that the two countries have a strained relationship and that nearly 70% of survey respondents disapproved of U.S. leadership. Also, just 9% of Yemenite respondents approved of U.S. leadership, less than in any other country reviewed by Gallup. The country suffers from a very poor economy, with GDP per capita at just $2,348 last year, among the very lowest in the world. According to the World Bank, more than half of the country’s population lived in poverty as of 2012. U.S. citizens are currently under advisory from the U.S. State Department to avoid traveling to Yemen due to the extremely high security threat level.

3. Lebanon
> Disapproval rating:
71.0%
> GDP per capita: $15,832 (66th highest)
> Unemployment: N/A
> Life expectancy: 80 years (tied for 23rd highest)

Like many countries that disapprove of U.S. leadership, Lebanon has a long history of conflict with Israel. Hezbollah, a militant group and political party deemed a terrorist organization by the United States and European Union, has operated out of Lebanon for several decades. In February, Israeli forces bombed a Hezbollah convoy on the Syrian-Lebanese border. Hezbollah subsequently claimed responsibility for the roadside bombing of an Israeli patrol along the Lebanese-Israeli border in retaliation. The country is also strapped with debt. Its gross debt was nearly 143% of its GDP last year, the third highest in the world. According to a recent AP report, the country’s debt problem is compounded by corruption and a government unwilling to act. In 2012, 85% of residents stated that corruption was widespread, the most of any comparable country.

2. Pakistan
> Disapproval rating:
73.0%
> GDP per capita: $3,144 (48th lowest)
> Unemployment: 6.7% (47th lowest)
> Life expectancy: 66 (46th lowest)

While 73% of Pakistani respondents still disapproved of U.S. leadership in 2013, this was a six percentage points improvement over 2012. Relations with Pakistan have been tense since the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States by al-Qaeda. Shortly after the attacks, the U.S. made Pakistan the base of its operations in its hunt for al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden and the war on Afghanistan’s then-leadership, the Taliban. In 2009, a survey revealed that 59% of the Pakistani people viewed the United States as a bully and as a bigger threat than al-Qaeda. Further exacerbating the country’s negative view of the U.S. may be Pakistan’s struggling economy and poor governance. Just one in 10 Pakistanis said they lived comfortably on their incomes in 2012, according to Gallup, and only 23% of Pakistanis expressed confidence in their government.

1. Palestinian territories
> Disapproval rating:
80.0%
> GDP per capita: N/A
> Unemployment: N/A
> Life expectancy: 73 years (95th highest)

Four of five Palestinians disapproved of American leadership, by far the worst perception of the United States globally. One explanation for the country’s hostility toward the United States is Palestine’s conflict with Israel. Hamas, the organization that has effectively governed the Gaza Strip territory since 2007, is considered by the United States and European Union to be a terrorist organization. Possibly emphasizing the deep divides in the Palestinian territories, just 18% of respondents told Gallup the place they lived was a good place for racial and ethnic minorities in 2012, less than all but one other country in the region.

By Alexander E.M. Hess, Vince Calio and Thomas C. Frohlich


Read more: Nine Countries That Hate America Most - 24/7 Wall St. http://247wallst.com/special-report...tries-that-hate-america-most/3/#ixzz3vo86FwPP

As you can see there is an underlining tone and theme to part of the question being posed. Why do people hate the US. But its not the one you think it is.

I will post more later in reply to your comment.
Come on really?? So the US should apologize for being great and for being free, fuck that. we give people around the world more opportunity than anyone ever has. Maybe they should be pissed off they live in a country that holds back its citizens by limiting freedom.

And we are not the worlds biggest contributor of carbon dioxide....you ever been to China, they spew out more carbon emissions than anyone and they don't give a *******.

I am just tired of having to apologize to the rest of the world for what America is and stands for. Does everyone have to like us, no of course not but that doesnt give them the right to attack us because we dont have the same values as them. Not saying the US is perfect and never does anything wrong, we have leaders who dont always make the right decisions in the world but i still believe this is the greatest country on earth.
 
Come on really?? So the US should apologize for being great and for being free, fuck that. we give people around the world more opportunity than anyone ever has. Maybe they should be pissed off they live in a country that holds back its citizens by limiting freedom.

And we are not the worlds biggest contributor of carbon dioxide....you ever been to China, they spew out more carbon emissions than anyone and they don't give a *******.

I am just tired of having to apologize to the rest of the world for what America is and stands for. Does everyone have to like us, no of course not but that doesnt give them the right to attack us because we dont have the same values as them. Not saying the US is perfect and never does anything wrong, we have leaders who dont always make the right decisions in the world but i still believe this is the greatest country on earth.

Why did I have an idea the meaning of the posts would go right over your head? before the rest of my posts...You seem fixated on everyone hating Americans when the truth is they don't. They hate American policy.


As I said I will post more on what you perceive and what is actual.
 
Come on really?? So the US should apologize for being great and for being free, fuck that. we give people around the world more opportunity than anyone ever has. Maybe they should be pissed off they live in a country that holds back its citizens by limiting freedom.

And we are not the worlds biggest contributor of carbon dioxide....you ever been to China, they spew out more carbon emissions than anyone and they don't give a *******.

I am just tired of having to apologize to the rest of the world for what America is and stands for. Does everyone have to like us, no of course not but that doesnt give them the right to attack us because we dont have the same values as them. Not saying the US is perfect and never does anything wrong, we have leaders who dont always make the right decisions in the world but i still believe this is the greatest country on earth.

Alan,
Don't shoot the messenger.
 
What you can expect to get when you take out a dictator ...

View attachment 739500
So ... let me get this straight. By that graphic, you are saying we should just ignore dictators who commit war crimes against their own people? That is in essence what your graphic says.
Something needs to be done, but we need to be more careful about what we do, who we do it against, and what will follow. For example, a good idea is not telling the enemy our troop strength or our withdrawl date. And it definitely is not a good idea to hand over 5 of the enemy's generals when the war is still going on.
 
Back
Top