Wake Up, America! Wake Up! PLEASE!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ever looked in the mirror, sweetheart? Looking back at you is certainly no Einstein ... View attachment 5055591
Are you trying to get the thread shut down? Having trouble understanding:
Refrain from any insult to your opponents, if you are not able to restrain your emotions, leave the discussion and forget about it! Use only facts and appeal to arguments, not insults! If you have nothing to say, please be silent.
 
You can't read?
for the third time....show me....if i post it in bigger print can you show me?


Republicans have blamed the left for leaking a draft opinion that would overturn Roe v. Wade, but a New Yorker columnist says the evidence points toward an abortion opponent on the right.

Jonathan Chait appeared Friday on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" to discuss his latest column, which theorizes that someone who wants the 5-4 decision banning abortion to stand, based on another leak a few days prior to Politico's bombshell report on Justice Samuel Alito's draft opinion.

"I want to be clear that I have no idea who leaked this and it definitely could have come from the left," Chait said, "but I wrote this because so much of the commentary from the right simply assumed that the leaks that come from the left and ignored the fact that we have a smaller leak three days before from the Wall Street Journal that had the same effect they're decrying, which is to put public pressure on the justices to rule in a certain way. That is the reason why they say this leak is so dangerous, because it subjects the justices to this kind of lobbying and that is exactly why the Wall Street Journal was leaked this early version, and they really had the inside scoop on the breakdown inside of the court."



which theorizes that someone who wants the 5-4 decision banning abortion to stand.......not quite what you are TRYING to say



His post contains the term "ban abortion"
 
for the third time....show me....if i post it in bigger print can you show me?


Republicans have blamed the left for leaking a draft opinion that would overturn Roe v. Wade, but a New Yorker columnist says the evidence points toward an abortion opponent on the right.

Jonathan Chait appeared Friday on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" to discuss his latest column, which theorizes that someone who wants the 5-4 decision banning abortion to stand, based on another leak a few days prior to Politico's bombshell report on Justice Samuel Alito's draft opinion.

"I want to be clear that I have no idea who leaked this and it definitely could have come from the left," Chait said, "but I wrote this because so much of the commentary from the right simply assumed that the leaks that come from the left and ignored the fact that we have a smaller leak three days before from the Wall Street Journal that had the same effect they're decrying, which is to put public pressure on the justices to rule in a certain way. That is the reason why they say this leak is so dangerous, because it subjects the justices to this kind of lobbying and that is exactly why the Wall Street Journal was leaked this early version, and they really had the inside scoop on the breakdown inside of the court."



which theorizes that someone who wants the 5-4 decision banning abortion to stand.......not quite what you are TRYING to say



His post contains the term "ban abortion"
So basically you proved me wrong by proving me right? Thank you for proving me right! 👏👏
 
STUPID

Explain how/why I threatened anyone. I’ll be glad to meet him, it would be fun making him look like an idiot in person instead of online, like I usually do.

And don’t forget to explain why OMEBAS comment that I responded to, want a threat. Yeah right, you won’t explain because you are too stupid to explain anything

You are wrong again. Lol

It was over 250 dislikes for you alone.
Wow. Usually I get only one or two dislikes. From time to time I get called a few names. Last night both sides of the issue exhausted all the negative terms. I must have done something right.

wish there was a string for Canadian Politics. What a great idea. Maybe I will start one. Na. Canadians are too polite to reply. That is unless you question the decisions of the prime minister‘s choice of socks.
 
Wow. Usually I get only one or two dislikes. From time to time I get called a few names. Last night both sides of the issue exhausted all the negative terms. I must have done something right.

wish there was a string for Canadian Politics. What a great idea. Maybe I will start one. Na. Canadians are too polite to reply. That is unless you question the decisions of the prime minister‘s choice of socks.

Start one
 
Cannot do that. I would be called a racist for commenting on his socks. They are Montreal Canadien socks. Like to wear them when he is in Toronto. Home of the Toronto Maple Leafs.

Meant start a thread on Canadian politics - I replied before you edited your post and said Na.

There are quite a few Canadians on the site - the op is a Canadian.
 
This topic will be closed for 1 week, in order for all participants to rest and accumulate material for communication on the topic of politics and not discussion of personal hostility!

If gentlemen and ladies in this topic do not learn to communicate without personal hostility with respect for each other, we will close the political section and all political topics will be deleted in the future.

You have only two options: communication with respect to each other, or you all participants of the political forum nominate a moderator from your ranks to the politics section who will clean and remove all your squabbles and disputes off topic.


Relax Self Care GIF by Razer
 
1
Week of rest from political debates and personal grudges and squabbles!

THIS TOPIC WILL OPEN AGAIN ON MAY 14

if I don't forget that I need to reopen this topic

 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top