Wake Up, America! Wake Up! PLEASE!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
What are you doing to help these people. You are very concerned about them, so I’m sure you are donating and volunteering constantly.

Or are you just another liberal hypocrite?

You are very very bad at this

Please STOP use a "STUPID" word in all the your new posts.

 
For those NOT knowing what a Fact is ....

FACT

Noun
  1. a thing that is known or proved to be true:
    "he ignores some historical and economic facts" ·
    [more]
    synonyms:
    reality · actuality · certainty · factuality · certitude · truth · naked truth · verity · gospel
 
All of these my body my choice extremist are throwing a hissy fit because there is a leak that their precious Roe vs Wade may be overturned. I am sure that most of these people don't even know the truth about anything concerning this Roe vs Wade 1973 Supreme Court Case other than the title Roe vs Wade means I can abort babies.

Poor sub, you can't actually believe the bullshit you spew here...

On a side note, I'm so very entertained at watching liberals flip out over the possibility of Roe being rightfully overturned... If it is, it won't make abortion illegal, but makes it a state by state issue, like it should be.
Extremist? Flipping out? I don't agree with either of you simply because it is a discussion totally not about us-we aren't women, and unless it's on an individual level-wife, *******, gf none of your business, like all of those other personal freedoms you talk about.

But if in fact it is overturned, what do either of you propose in regard to unwanted pregnancies that must come to term? And the question goes to mom, *******, and sperm donor, if found, or not?
 
Extremist? Flipping out? I don't agree with either of you simply because it is a discussion totally not about us-we aren't women, and unless it's on an individual level-wife, *******, gf none of your business, like all of those other personal freedoms you talk about.

But if in fact it is overturned, what do either of you propose in regard to unwanted pregnancies that must come to term? And the question goes to *******, *******, and sperm donor, if found, or not?
What does being a woman have to do with the irrefutable fact that this is an issue that simply isn't covered by the US constitution, and therefore is a state by state issue? What's the problem with allowing the states to decide for themselves what to do? If you don't like the choice of your state, you can live in another, it's really that simple.

And I'm not sure what you're saying with the stricken words, did you intend for them to be stricken? Or was that something that the site did automatically?
 
Poor sub, you can't actually believe the bullshit you spew here...

On a side note, I'm so very entertained at watching liberals flip out over the possibility of Roe being rightfully overturned... If it is, it won't make abortion illegal, but makes it a state by state issue, like it should be.
wtf you talking about......90% of what i post is actual news articles......I find interesting and pertaining to the board....some humorous and some not......but I post because I think they are interesting......and naturally alot of them are trump.....seems he just loves to be in the news.....just looked and he has at least 5 articles in there right now and that will all change about 5am


so NOT bullshit...it is news....and not my problem you prefer to remain stupid and not know what is going on around you
 
Wow, it took 2300 pages to get a mod involved? Where were they when wild speculations about me, and terrible, disparaging comments were made about my wife tens of thousands of posts ago?
they pop in and do the moderating thing on occasion....never know when....normally something brings them here.....we all know what brought them here now
 
What does being a woman have to do with the irrefutable fact that this is an issue that simply isn't covered by the US constitution, and therefore is a state by state issue? What's the problem with allowing the states to decide for themselves what to do? If you don't like the choice of your state, you can live in another, it's really that simple.

And I'm not sure what you're saying with the stricken words, did you intend for them to be stricken? Or was that something that the site did automatically?
wrong again....it is a constitutional issue........women have rights....where does it go from here....you already have a baby....time for ***********?....some women complains you knocked her up...again ***********......you republicans want invbolved in everything....to include peoiples bodies

and as much as there is supposed to be seperation between church and state.....we all know in the south the right could not get elected on their own merits and needs the church.....so there would be a bann in the south.....and most republican states
 
Look how he responded to my post, This, oh I care so much for the children they will be unwanted, they are not simply a fetus, as soon as that sperm cell hits that egg it is life, at that point a baby has two options, to live and be born or to die because of health issues or to be murdered by selfish women through abortions. Keep hitting the dislike button, I refuse to talk to brain dead leftist.
facts there ding bat......you want some facts......or would you prefer to hide it.....thye church involvement in government has done more to hurt this country than russia ever did.....and it is supposed to be seperate.....but the right uses the cloak of the church to hurt people and make big corps wealthier
 
What does being a woman have to do with the irrefutable fact that this is an issue that simply isn't covered by the US constitution, and therefore is a state by state issue? What's the problem with allowing the states to decide for themselves what to do? If you don't like the choice of your state, you can live in another, it's really that simple.

And I'm not sure what you're saying with the stricken words, did you intend for them to be stricken? Or was that something that the site did automatically?
It was automatic referring to an in house family member....I asked as a spouse or a parent. I live in a state that once insisted I be 3/5 a person and even after the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments resisted the spirit of the law for a century. I'm not a supporter of state's rights.
 
It was automatic referring to an in house family member....I asked as a spouse or a parent. I live in a state that once insisted I be 3/5 a person and even after the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments resisted the spirit of the law for a century. I'm not a supporter of state's rights.
Do you know why the 3/5 thing was done? It was one of the major reasons why slavery was abolished and equality happened.
 

This applies to all participants in political and any other discussions and disputes: Refrain from any insult to your opponents, if you are not able to restrain your emotions, leave the discussion and forget about it! Use only facts and appeal to arguments, not insults! If you have nothing to say, please be silent.

it would seem....now there are 2 of them that are unwilling to discuss...just want to play kid games
 
wrong again....it is a constitutional issue........women have rights....where does it go from here....you already have a baby....time for ***********?....some women complains you knocked her up...again ***********......you republicans want invbolved in everything....to include peoiples bodies

and as much as there is supposed to be seperation between church and state.....we all know in the south the right could not get elected on their own merits and needs the church.....so there would be a bann in the south.....and most republican states
It's a state by state issue... Nothing more...

Separation of church and state is NO WHERE in the founding documents.
 
Do you know why the 3/5 thing was done? It was one of the major reasons why slavery was abolished and equality happened.
Yes I do; to increase population numbers, therefore representation, as well as increase federal allocations with minimal "citizen" input.
 
Yes I do; to increase population numbers, therefore representation, as well as increase federal allocations with minimal "citizen" input.
Wrong, it was to eliminate the risk of Democrats, who were and still are the party of slavery, from gaining total control and causing the racial injustices to continue... Was it perfect? No, but it's what they did to prevent that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top