Last edited:
Its not a perjury trap if one doesn't LIE under oath ... you do know that, right? By saying its a perjury trap is saying you know Trump is a liar, which he most definitely is ... or do you deny THAT as well, Mr Rudy Giuliani?There is no way Trump will sit down with Mueller. It's all just a perjury trap. Mueller knows there is no evidence of collusion.
To talk about WHAT information? Collusion? As they've said, collusion, in and of itself, is not a crime, however, collusion leads to conspiracy which is a major crime ... punishable by years and years of federal prison time.You don't need Trump to sit down to talk to get that kind of information.
You clearly don't know what a perjury trap is. If one doesn't lie under oath, it isn't perjury. A perjury trap is a prosecutorial technique, considered prosecutorial misconduct, where the prosecutor attempts to induce a perjurous statement which will allow him/her to then indict the target of the trap. Whether or not the target lies under oath has nothing to do with whether it was a perjury trap....it merely determines whether the perjury trap was successful or not.Its not a perjury trap if one doesn't LIE under oath ... you do know that, right?
Regarding YOUR OPINION ....You clearly don't know what a perjury trap is.
LOL, yes that's quite obvious...and particularly humorous when he doubles down like this and winds up further demonstrating his ignorance. But hey at least he can google a phrase and cut and paste....even if he doesn't comprehend it.He clearly doesn't know what a perjury trap is.
You are delusional.No, it's me, the person who created the art that you use in your profile avatar.
I'm waiting patiently for the absolute farce of an investigation to conclude, if it ever does. I think Democrats will keep it going for as long as it takes for them to get back in power. So it could be another 6 years.
You clearly don't know what a perjury trap is. If one doesn't lie under oath, it isn't perjury. A perjury trap is a prosecutorial technique, considered prosecutorial misconduct, where the prosecutor attempts to induce a perjurous statement which will allow him/her to then indict the target of the trap. Whether or not the target lies under oath has nothing to do with whether it was a perjury trap....it merely determines whether the perjury trap was successful or not.
If you haven't had the pleasure of being grilled under oath by a clever attorney, you should try it sometime. It can lead to tortured attempts to cover one's ass like saying "it depends upon what the meaning of the word "is" is"
He clearly doesn't know what a perjury trap is.
I'm already done wasting time trying to enlighten folks who's minds are too far gone from being brainwashing by Trump but I'll respond to this pile-on against Mac man.LOL, yes that's quite obvious...and particularly humorous when he doubles down like this and winds up further demonstrating his ignorance. But hey at least he can google a phrase and cut and paste....even if he doesn't comprehend it.
@Hottobe cucked Wise idea, just stay on the sidelines, I'm trying to leave it all alone also as its not worth it because Time is going to reveal the truth and who's right about all of this and if I'm wrong I'll be a man and admit I was wrong. However we've already seen enough to know exactly where this is headed if one's vision isn't clouded with bias and plain ignoring of the facts all presented.I would give my voice to this thread, but it just wouldn't matter and I am ignorant to most of this.
Please understand that Trump got in and I hope some good comes of it. I believe that the Clintons have paved the path they have taken ever since their college days with *******, debauchery. and criminal acts all along the way. I never did like the Clintons and would never have voted for either of them. We had nothing positive to choose from this time.
ROTFLMFAOBreaking news: Mueller said he will accept written answers from Trump.
You can't be happy about that. It's the beginning of the end for Mueller and his investigation.
What size is your tinfoil hat?From what I have read and learned, Hillary is either a lesbian or bi-sexual, met Bill in college, chose and married him because she saw in him a man that She with her family influence could make him into Presidential material. He was her puppet and if you can believe some of what is out there to read, they were not beyond ******* of anyone that threatened their success. I saw on you tube a video called the Clinton murders. I found it interesting whether it is all true or maybe has some truth that is not my call.
Tinfoil Hat, real cute, due some research then you may learn something.What size is your tinfoil hat?
"do"Tinfoil Hat, real cute, due some research then you may learn something.
No, what I said on the perjury trap issue is 100% correct. I merely pointed out that Mac's statement demonstrated (to anyone with even a sophomoric level of knowledge on the issue) that Mac didn't know what a perjury trap was followed by an explanation dumbed down to a level at least a few on here should be able to understand. Note, I said nothing about the veracity of the perjury trap claim regarding Trump's potential testimony.Your all wrong on the perjury trap that Trump is trying to avoid and he can always plead the fifth to not answering some of the questions if he feels he would perjure himself. Now your all smoking the pipe Giuallini has lit for you with that perjury trap BS narrative excuse for why Trump shouldn't meet with the special counsel.
He could attempt to plead the fifth, but Mueller could easily counter this with a grant of immunity. Such a grant takes away a person's fifth amendment protection against self incrimination. The Trump Deraingement Syndrome crowd would likely blow a gasket if Mueller granted Trump immunity. However, doing so would compel Trump's testimony and if they could trap him in any perjurous statement or other criminal count that testimony could be used against Trump in an impeachment proceeding.he can always plead the fifth to not answering some of the questions if he feels he would perjure himself.
Wow that's an impressive background in perjury law. If only you had stayed in a Holiday Inn Express last night too, I might hire you for legal advice.As someone who has been questioned by authorities who were conducting an investigation so long as you willingly tell the truth on your account of the events and you haven't broken any laws they can't hang you on anything. I'm still walking free right now smiling but I would never do a tenth of the stuff that Trump has done either.
No, what I said on the perjury trap issue is 100% correct. I merely pointed out that Mac's statement demonstrated (to anyone with even a sophomoric level of knowledge on the issue) that Mac didn't know what a perjury trap was followed by an explanation dumbed down to a level at least a few on here should be able to understand. Note, I said nothing about the veracity of the perjury trap claim regarding Trump's potential testimony.
Instead of your Gish Gallop meandering through Comey, Hillary emails, Russia, even the National Enquirer; try making some substantive statement to disprove what I actually said.
He could attempt to plead the fifth, but Mueller could easily counter this with a grant of immunity. Such a grant takes away a person's fifth amendment protection against self incrimination. The Trump Deraingement Syndrome crowd would likely blow a gasket if Mueller granted Trump immunity. However, doing so would compel Trump's testimony and if they could trap him in any perjurous statement or other criminal count that testimony could be used against Trump in an impeachment proceeding.
Wow that's an impressive background in perjury law. If only you had stayed in a Holiday Inn Express last night too, I might hire you for legal advice.