If that’s the case then you guys must be ******* at investigating as it’s took your FBI 2 fucking years to get nowhere when they clearly should of just come to you for all the evidence. Maybe try turning over from CNN once in a while.
I don't think you're seeing the BIG PICTURE, here,
usemygirl. Trump hires and fires based on his appointees willingness to LIE for him, that's why he's gone through so many cabinet appointees in just 2 short years. Why do you think White House Press Secty Sara Sanders has lasted so long? His appointment of Barr as Attorney General was basically because Barr contacted Trump telling him he would "cover for him". Barr has no authority to circumvent the report on Trump & his administration's collusion and obstruction with Russia. He gets a copy just like congress should get a copy ... word for word, no changes and no black outs. By doing what Barr did, he's obstructed congress's ability to evaluate the study. If in fact, the only way to remove Trump from office IS to impeach him, then its only right that Congress be able to decide that based upon the Mueller report.
Let's use an example: Suppose Trump shared the nuclear codes with someone
unassociated with Russia, and the report pointed that event out. Should Barr have the right to stricken that information from the report that Congress sees simply because it was not related to the RUSSIAN investigation? What do you think? Yes or No?
If a police warrant to your home says they're there for *******, but instead find homemade bombs and a plan to bomb a school, are you saying they have no right to arrest you simply because the warrant says they're there for *******? Give me a break! Get real!
Ask yourself this question, IF Trump and his administration had NOTHING to hide, why would they block the entirety of the report to Congress? Why would Trump NOT answer Mueller's questions, under oath? How could our "Trump appointed" AG Barr come to a conclusion that there was no obstruction in the Mueller investigation? Mueller pointed out a dozen obstructions discovered and an outline for Congress to investigate further should they decide to remove Trump from office. Mueller said he could not do that because Trump was a sitting President, thus leaving it up to congress.
Over 12% of that report was redacted from Congress review. Barr is obstructing "due process" by blocking parts of the report. If there is nothing to hide ... why block anything? Are you NOT capable of answering the questions truthfully to yourself?
What if you went to see a movie, and the theater cut OFF the last 20 minutes of the movie, and you were asked to leave? Would you be pissed? Should you get your money back? Did the theater breech their contract by not fulfilling your ability to see the entirety of a movie you paid FULL PRICE to see? The American taxpayers PAID for the Mueller investigation and a lot of people got indicted during the investigation. Why is Trump any more privileged than the others of breaking laws?
I'm telling you, you TrumpNuts are just that ... frki'n
NUTS!