Politics, Politics, Politics

Typical leftist, can't post anything that makes any sense, calling people meaningless names, throwing around terms like "thug" and "tard"... What a pathetic existence you must have, maybe you should see a therapist about your blind rage caused by nothing...
Literally NONE of that is actually true... Anyone with a shred of intelligence (something you lack), recommend that people get their children OUT OF GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS... God, you're so easy to get enraged... That's a problem.
Healthcare is not a right, you dumb fuck.
Reign it in.
I won't call you a typical rightist, pathetic, question your existence, then your intelligence, or call you a dumb fuck in a ten minute span.
 
You're getting desperate trying to post some kind of "good news" for the DumasCrap party. You had to go back and dredge up a YouTube video from almost a year and a half ago. (Jan 21)

How about we look a bit at more current events:

Seems Democrats are choosing to leave Congress at a rate double that of Republicans: It’s no surprise then that more than twice as many Democrats as Republicans, 28 to 13, have decided to either retire or run for another office at this point.



Despite your Bullshit Youtube claims from the highly reputable "The Young Turks" Gallup poll data shows over 2021, the population's party affiliation did a near 180 going from 49% Dem/40% Rep to 47% Rep/42% Dem.

View attachment 5144401

I like how devoted you are to the Republican Party, but the demographics show a big change though! You do realize that white people will become the minority in the future, right, whether you like it or not? By the way, why do you pick and choose using that Gallup article? That party affiliation is showing how they look in a quarterly manner! Do you know how it looks when the poll asks about party affiliation Yearly? Well, it shows that Democrats leading 100%! Check the full article out, and stop that picking and choosing bullshit to support your love for the Republican Party! Oh, one other tidbit that the article stated is that Independents are still the largest political group in the U.S., which is good depending on who the individual votes for!!

Though, of course, with President Biden approval rating declining so much, it would cause the Republican Party to have the upper hand, but when you break sh*t down though demographically, the Democratic Party wins! Why do you think it is so damn difficult for a Republican President to win the popular vote? And, even then, it's like pulling teeth in order for a Republican President to do that!!


By the way, here is another tidbit regarding the political parties and the voting process and the media is not talking about this, which is they are strongly considering bringing blockchain technology into the fold though can the government be trusted when it comes to using that powerful technology? Because I know a lot about cryptocurrency, I wonder if the government would use the Ethereum blockchain or the Cardano blockchain!! 🤔

P.S. Would be better to use Ethereum after the upgrade!!
 
Last edited:
Yeah we're not like those "perfect ReThuglicans" who tamper with "fair elections", actually double & triple voting and getting caught. And those right-to-lifers who protect the embryo but toss out the benefits for the poor children in schools. And those tax-cuts for everyone that always seem to always be for the rich ... yeah I wish we were more like those PERFECT TrumpTARDS who lie about everything from birther rights to legitimate poll results in elections. Those "TARDS" who say guns don't ******* people" and AR-15's are for target practice and shooting small game.
They're the perfect party, alright, those Trumptards.
Sorry, You are what you are, you can't help yourself as you regurgitate your own egotistical opinions all over B2W.
 
Sorry, You are what you are, you can't help yourself as you regurgitate your own egotistical opinions all over B2W.
A lot of it isn't egotistical opinion, Stanley. Conservatives just choose to view it that way.
When you folks look at what happened on Jan 6th as a normal day of "tourism" rather than what it was ... a planned coup against the USA, then you lose a lot of respect from those of us (including many conservatives) who view it for exactly what it was.
Thing is, the man you folks support has lied to you hundreds if not thousands of times and you keep coming back for more. It makes no sense to those of us who live in the reality & common sense.
I believe, IF Trump manages to work himself back into the White House, many of you Trumptards are going to be very disillusioned by his next steps at totally destroying democracy. How he's managed so far has amazed many.
 
Healthcare is not a right, you dumb fuck.
There is disagreement there.

 
But you did tell me to FOAD... Rules for thee, not for me?
And when was that? I've said more than that to you and others. I admit it. But I have not hurled an insult in your direction since well before the thread suspensions, and YOU were one of those after the return who spoke to elevating their dialog.

I said 'reign it in' and then rejected using the reverse of your diatribes. To be clear, you didn't direct any of them at me. I also note your participation has reduced. But coming back with crap like that adds no value.
 
Then you and your leftist masters are wrong.

The right to health was first articulated in the WHO Constitution (1946) which states that: “the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being…”. The preamble of the Constitution defines health as: “.. a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity”.

The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights mentioned health as part of the right to an adequate standard of living (article 25). It was again recognised as a human right in 1966 in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Article 12:

“1. The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.

2. The steps to be taken by the States Parties to the present Covenant to achieve the full realization of this right shall include those necessary for:

(a) The provision for the reduction of the stillbirth-rate and of ******* mortality and for the healthy development of the baby;

(b) The improvement of all aspects of environmental and industrial hygiene;

(c) The prevention, treatment and control of epidemic, endemic, occupational and other diseases;

(d) The creation of conditions which would assure to all medical service and medical attention in the event of sickness.”

The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, a body composed of independent experts in charge of monitoring the implementation of the Covenant, provided a broad interpretation of article 12 of the Covenant (General Comments No.2014):

The right to health is an inclusive right, extending not only to timely and appropriate health care, but also to the underlying determinants of health, such as access to safe and potable water and adequate sanitation, healthy occupational and environmental conditions, and access to health-related education and information, including on sexual and reproductive health (Paragraph 11).

The right to health is relevant to all States: every State has ratified at least one international human rights treaty that recognises the right to health.
 
And when was that? I've said more than that to you and others. I admit it. But I have not hurled an insult in your direction since well before the thread suspensions, and YOU were one of those after the return who spoke to elevating their dialog.

I said 'reign it in' and then rejected using the reverse of your diatribes. To be clear, you didn't direct any of them at me. I also note your participation has reduced. But coming back with crap like that adds no value.

He gave up on trying to elevate the dialog. I wish it was surprising.
 
The right to health was first articulated in the WHO Constitution (1946) which states that: “the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being…”. The preamble of the Constitution defines health as: “.. a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity”.

The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights mentioned health as part of the right to an adequate standard of living (article 25). It was again recognised as a human right in 1966 in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Article 12:

“1. The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.

2. The steps to be taken by the States Parties to the present Covenant to achieve the full realization of this right shall include those necessary for:

(a) The provision for the reduction of the stillbirth-rate and of ******* mortality and for the healthy development of the baby;

(b) The improvement of all aspects of environmental and industrial hygiene;

(c) The prevention, treatment and control of epidemic, endemic, occupational and other diseases;

(d) The creation of conditions which would assure to all medical service and medical attention in the event of sickness.”

The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, a body composed of independent experts in charge of monitoring the implementation of the Covenant, provided a broad interpretation of article 12 of the Covenant (General Comments No.2014):

The right to health is an inclusive right, extending not only to timely and appropriate health care, but also to the underlying determinants of health, such as access to safe and potable water and adequate sanitation, healthy occupational and environmental conditions, and access to health-related education and information, including on sexual and reproductive health (Paragraph 11).

The right to health is relevant to all States: every State has ratified at least one international human rights treaty that recognises the right to health.
The only right involving Healthcare, is the right to the ACCESS of Healthcare, something we all have always had...

The WHO does not govern here.
 
And when was that? I've said more than that to you and others. I admit it. But I have not hurled an insult in your direction since well before the thread suspensions, and YOU were one of those after the return who spoke to elevating their dialog.

I said 'reign it in' and then rejected using the reverse of your diatribes. To be clear, you didn't direct any of them at me. I also note your participation has reduced. But coming back with crap like that adds no value.
You said it some time ago... Also, the use of accurate descriptive terms (which is what I do) is NOT insults...
 
Back
Top