So, is there ANY media source(s) you think is/are credible? And why?
OAN, Reuters, epoch times, south china morning post, local news talk radio, etc
So, is there ANY media source(s) you think is/are credible? And why?
Yeah, its been going on for sometime now. Dating back to ... wait for it ... Michelle Bachman & Glenn Beck BS they use to dish out on President Obama all the time? And of course, Fox News gave them their vehicle ... Remember the Rethuglicans use to come up with all these exaggerated tales?This crap has got to stop.
Yeah, its been going on for sometime now. Dating back to ... wait for it ... Michelle Bachman & Glenn Beck BS they use to dish out on President Obama all the time? And of course, Fox News gave them their vehicle ... Remember the Rethuglicans use to come up with all these exaggerated tales?
Remember THESE?
Rep. Michele Bachmann claims Obama's trip to India will cost the taxpayers $200 million a day
It sure sounds outrageous. On his upcoming presidential trip to India, President Barack Obama is bringing an entourage owww.politifact.comFox News - Breaking News Updates | Latest News Headlines | Photos & News Video
Breaking News, Latest News and Current News from FOXNews.com. Breaking news and video. Latest Current News: U.S., World, Entertainment, Health, Business, Technology, Politics, Sports.insider.foxnews.com
KARMA, baby ... its KARMA.
He’s still mad he didn’t get that lying awful sack of ******* Hillary Clinton in the White House. I’m sure things would have been great !!!! HahhaahaNot quite the same things there Mac. LOL Good grief man you can't even compare apples to apples. No wonder you think Trump is the Anti-Christ.
Your articles has absolutely 0 to do with what I posted, not even close.
He’s still mad he didn’t get that lying awful sack of ******* Hillary Clinton in the White House. I’m sure things would have been great !!!! Hahhaaha
Angry people .. and ignorant as well. ImLyin' Donald: 101 Of Trump's Greatest Lies | Daily Wire
.dailywire.com/news/4834/trumps-101-lies-hank-berrien
Apr 11, 2016 · For a comprehensive list of why Trump is not a conservative, see here. 101. Trump: "I don't condone violence.” Trump: "I'd like to punch him in the face.” That's not even a complete list. Trump's dishonesty is so awe-inspiringly pervasive that it would be nearly impossible to catalogue those lies in comprehensive fashion.
Just one random rant, but I'm getting very tired of the intellectually bankrupt Sinophobic nonsense in the US media.
(I just bought a Huawei barely 6 months ago, when this crap had to happen.)
Huawei is constantly accused of stealing technology. And it is also constantly held up by alarmists that it is super far ahead in technology, that it is 2 years ahead, that it has an insurmountable lead, that no one else can beat Huawei unless the US bans it from trading, whatever.
So Huawei stole technology and is ahead by 2 years at least?
Does that mean Huawei took Doc's DeLorean to the future, stole US technology after it was invented, came back and is now ahead of everyone else with the stolen tech?
So far the US government has produced no evidence that Huawei has built security traps and threats in its hardware.
Considering how many BILLION Huawei phones, routers and other equipment there are in the market, it should be easy peasy to grab a few, hand them to the NSA, and let the NSA guys do their thing. The NSA is capable of spying on everyone plus they are responsible for the current EternalBlue attacks in Baltimore. If someone knows about hacking and threats, it should be the NSA. If all the paranoia and fear and alarmism in the world still can't incentivize the NSA to find problems in Huawei stuff, then there is no problem in Huawei stuff.
If Huawei is a real security threat, I suspect it is because they got hold of that DeLorean. Not because Huawei can, or is about to, spy on anyone.
Just one random rant, but I'm getting very tired of the intellectually bankrupt Sinophobic nonsense in the US media.
(I just bought a Huawei barely 6 months ago, when this crap had to happen.)
Huawei is constantly accused of stealing technology. And it is also constantly held up by alarmists that it is super far ahead in technology, that it is 2 years ahead, that it has an insurmountable lead, that no one else can beat Huawei unless the US bans it from trading, whatever.
So Huawei stole technology and is ahead by 2 years at least?
Does that mean Huawei took Doc's DeLorean to the future, stole US technology after it was invented, came back and is now ahead of everyone else with the stolen tech?
So far the US government has produced no evidence that Huawei has built security traps and threats in its hardware.
Considering how many BILLION Huawei phones, routers and other equipment there are in the market, it should be easy peasy to grab a few, hand them to the NSA, and let the NSA guys do their thing. The NSA is capable of spying on everyone plus they are responsible for the current EternalBlue attacks in Baltimore. If someone knows about hacking and threats, it should be the NSA. If all the paranoia and fear and alarmism in the world still can't incentivize the NSA to find problems in Huawei stuff, then there is no problem in Huawei stuff.
If Huawei is a real security threat, I suspect it is because they got hold of that DeLorean. Not because Huawei can, or is about to, spy on anyone.
and your point is...…..
and yes they are stealing technology.....2 years ahead....pretty easy...….you see it in the development stage...….devote a lot of manpower and time....more than most biz do...….and you get a finished product ahead of others....where as we may have one or two or three working on it....they put a team devoted to that item
Um, that's not stealing if they got the idea from someone else and developed the idea properly before the someone else could.
Copyright law protects the expression of ideas, not the ideas themselves. Patent law protects defined industrial processes, not concepts.
In academia all the time, we trade ideas. Scientists and researchers get together and talk and share ideas even if they know full well someone works for Huawei and someone for Apple and someone for Cisco.
If Huawei scientists talked to someone and decided to work harder and faster at finding a solution to the same concept, that's not stealing at all. No wonder Huawei's critics can't sue it for a trillion dollars. In lawsuit crazy America with 2.5 million lawyers walking around, do you think Huawei could really have stolen stuff without being sued for nine and ten figure damages? But the complainers can't win their lawsuits saying that someone developed a process faster than them.
Chinese scientists work REALLY hard. As a low ranking academic who was never on tenure track, I admit that I can only go so far in my field. But what makes the difference between Assistant Professor, Tenured Professor, Titled Professor and someone who is at the top of his field in the private sector making 10 times as much as a titled professor? Sheer hard work. Huawei's scientists are top grade PhDs who literally slave away 360 days a year, 14 hour days until they arrive at their goals. Show me a US academic who does that. (Not me.)