Evolutionary response

Well, I was actually baiting the "breeding out white" theorists. Sort of like fishing ... you toss out a question expecting a couple people to bite and run with it. Heck, you guys know me, just trying to stimulate conversation or create a bit of mischief ... ;)
Guess too many people know me by now. :(
 
Well, I was actually baiting the "breeding out white" theorists. Sort of like fishing ... you toss out a question expecting a couple people to bite and run with it. Heck, you guys know me, just trying to stimulate conversation or create a bit of mischief ... ;)
Guess too many people know me by now. :(
Apparently, they do, Mac. lol
 
"Pure" is a relative term to say the least.
Generally if you look a certain way and you act a certain way,you are a duck even if the duck is part swan in his distant past.
There were only three ethnic ( racial, sub-species, or any other euphemism people want to use to describe our bio-diversity) groups really.
Asian, black, and white or what ever term is in fashion today. All other groups are a branch off or a result of mixing at some point.
And our differences are not just skin color, any DNA specialist or forensic anthropologist worth there salt can tell you that.
Heck the ******* companies are making money on are differences right now, http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/20/b...-failure-in-black-patients.html?ref=bidildrug

I think a better term then " Pure" ethnic group is our "spectrum" of ethnic groups, down to our DNA.
If we all become the same it leaves us very vulnerable to going extinct as a species.
Earths history has shown that to be the case time and again in regards to biology, because the world and universe are constantly changing we need readily available types of human to fill in the gaps. Think of it as our human biological weapons arsenal.
Skin color is actually a poor wayto tell differences. For example there are albino people in Africa, but they are not by DNA European related.
You are forgetting the Australoid, however I will admit there is some debate among anthropologist as to whether Australoid should be a sub category in the Negroid category. There is really very little difference genetically between any of us. Of the small differences about 85% of those differences are in populations remote from other population. Any local population has about a 15% variance. Just to be clear the we all share more than 99% of the same DNA. The variances I speak of her are what occurs in that less than one percent that makes us different
 
If you have a dog he or she is 99.8% the same as any other dog. Does that mean we should get ride of all different types of dogs, pleeease. Man that bull dog sure is the same as that golden retriever ...hmmmm
We are also 98.8% the same as a chimp, but look at the difference that 1.2% makes.
Your missing the point nature has seen fit to make verity, so we don't die out due to sudden changes that can happen. I.E. climate change, our sun changing, killer viruses, killer bacteria, and so on.
Doctors used to think sickle cell was a genetic defect but it is NOT it would help you survive in a places with lots of malaria. There was no medicine for this until the last 100 years.
Same goes for light skin, it helps you get more vitamin D in cloudy places. Could mean life or death in some places.
Gosh I could go into the facts of how certain ethnic groups have greater immunity to different viruses but that would turn into a term paper.
Things are always changing soo humans need different types to survive and thrive.
Might come in handy when we start colonizing other plants with extreme environments and unknown biology.
It's called evolution. As racial distinctions disappear biodiversity will actually go up. Then there are things like the Toba eruption 74,000 that was a near extinction level event for humanity. Barring a collapse of civilization many of the genetic differences like skin color at different latitudes, and natural resistance to diseases like malaria becomes less relevant. If civilization does collapse and homogenization of the races will have increased the biodiversity and increased humanities chances of survival.
 
Reading through this it becomes clear that black men just want "hot" white women so there will be lots of women for us white guys
 
Nope,
"As racial distinction disappears biodiversity goes will actually go up." LOL you either have zero understanding of evolution or are troll spreading false info to support genocide.
If people follow this false logic the Chinese gene will dominate and slowly breed out most other traits. Back in the 1800's it would have been the Europeans, at least they set up reservation for tribal peoples.
Your policy is genocide for abo's of Australia, The celtic redheads of northern Europe, the Tribes of south America, the blond trait through out the world, the Tibetans of china, and any other genetic trait that is rear. That's just the external signs, never mind the other hidden genetic traits lost.
And right now they are finding out there is a group of Europeans in the Baltic states who are not affected by HIV virus and it is not passed on if there mixed. If you destroy them, there goes any hope for finding out there immunity gene for AIDS. There is most likely other traits in other ethnic group we have no idea about.
It is the same as destroying the bio-diversity of the rain forest and not knowing or realizing that there are medication that can be develop from this hug bio-diversity we have there. Hence all the fuss about saving the rain forest.
We still don't under stand why sharks can't get cancer or why people with O- ******* are less prone to cancer also.
We are not talking about all the hedonist behavior people have and then go home.
Or the 1-2% of influx in and out of countries mixing. We are talking about the whole sale genocide of entire ethnic groups that you are promoting.
You Sir are supporting genocidal policy weather know it or not.
I hope you are not in a position of power of influence because:
This is a high crime according to international law(U.N.) and there is no vote weather you are guilty or not, just facts present to the judge.
Article II, part c of the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide:
“Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.”


...any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
— Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article 2[3

Article 3 defines the crimes that can be punished under the convention:
(a) Genocide;
(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;

(d) Attempt to commit genocide;
(e) Complicity in genocide.
— Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article 3[3]
I am neither ignorant or a troll. And I am in a position of significant authority. I have a good understanding of genetics. I do not support the destruction of any group however I do realistically understand that over time racial distinctions will disappear. These features of various local gene pools will be incorporated and spread. You appear to support the rather archaic and quaint view that various race and ethic groups should not intermarry. Intermarriage, or interbreeding does not constitute genocide. For future posts you should note the "weather" refers to the atmospheric conditions outside. e.g., the weather today is warm and sunny in San Diego. The word you want to use is "whether" e.g. you are supporting genocidal policies whether you know it or not. I noticed the error occurred more than once. It is harder for a writer to be taken seriously when they have a poor grasp of the language.
 
I am neither ignorant or a troll....

.... For future posts you should note the "weather" refers to the atmospheric conditions outside. e.g., the weather today is warm and sunny in San Diego. The word you want to use is "whether" e.g. you are supporting genocidal policies whether you know it or not.

I knew this was going to happen. See my prior post to this conversation. :)

I totally agree, Torp, BUT ... since grammar has become a part of this pie slinging debate, its either Neither-Nor , or it is Either-Or. They're not interchangeable. Just my note of observance, here! :)

Ok, I'll continue to watch this discussion with interests ... Mac
 
I knew this was going to happen. See my prior post to this conversation. :)

I totally agree, Torp, BUT ... since grammar has become a part of this pie slinging debate, its either Neither-Nor , or it is Either-Or. They're not interchangeable. Just my note of observance, here! :)

Ok, I'll continue to watch this discussion with interests ... Mac
I am most likely done with this thread. The chances of a Socratic Dialog are pretty slim
 
Now this should be shown on the 6 o'clock news and all cables channels across the world. White women need to see what the HELL they've been missing for far too long. After looking at this white ladies around the world would be hooked for life. White men just go ahead and cut your losses she is never CUMMIN back to you. It's a Wrap

Hey you black guys can have all the white women you want all they do is critisize and complain!
 
hollyG, in one of your earlier posts you mention that you and your husband attend swingers clubs in Atlanta. Do you go to these just to watch, or participate? If you have sex with anyone, other than your husband, how does that make you any different than the people here who pursue/enjoy interracial sex? My wife and I have participated in 3-some and couple swapping in our marriage ... haven't done the interracial yet, but, how would our sexual activities be any different than yours if you attend swingers clubs in Atlanta? Just curious as to where you are drawing/defining your line of infidelity? Mac :)

Hey Mac.. Before you posted this, and after reading through her profile, I was having the same question about her. She obviously answered the question in reference to her first black experience happened while attending a swingers club in Atlanta and now her comments are surprising me, much like it's a question of yours also. And I've also noticed that she hasn't responded to your questions either, so makes me wonder even more about her... Hopefully she will answer our questions sometime soon....
 
i totally agree with this post. Black Men and white girls are just the next step in evolution. Natural selection is occurring where white females want to mate with Black Men. The reason white girls are now rejecting white boys is that we white boys do not measure up to Black Men. i realized this very early in life and i accepted my inferior status as a white male. i applaud the new evolutionary phase, and i worship the new Masters of the earth.
Very realistic and insightful.
 
Back
Top