When it snows a foot of snow in Florida I'll jump right on this one.Long past time every white 'man' gets on board with that
If a couple is married the husband does not have to adopt. Any chi!d his wife gives birth to is legally his anyway.I think everybody should take responsibility. Either the wife divorces and goes to the black king or the husband adopts the childish as his own. And in the worst case scenario, the wife has an abortion.
Not in every country. Here where I live in Germany, the ******* does not have to pay baby support if you can prove that the baby is not his own. I don’t know what it’s like in other countries and sometimes even United States. It’s different from states to state.If a couple is married the husband does not have to adopt. Any chi!d his wife gives birth to is legally his anyway.
..... what's your source??? Its the person's name who appears on the birth certificate, however, if the baby doesn't belong to the male spouse, he doesn't have to accept it or be responsible for it. Many times if the baby is not biologically confirmed his, the male spouse will refuse to sign the birth certificate, taking ownership. A simple DNA test will prove that, and he may have to protest responsibility in court.If a couple is married the husband does not have to adopt. Any chi!d his wife gives birth to is legally his anyway.
It is not a matter of color. Respect is earned.View attachment 7471825 ..... what's your source??? Its the person's name who appears on the birth certificate, however, if the baby doesn't belong to the male spouse, he doesn't have to accept it or be responsible for it. Many times if the baby is not biologically confirmed his, the male spouse will refuse to sign the birth certificate, taking ownership. A simple DNA test will prove that, and he may have to protest responsibility in court.
Biological vs Paternal ... for those guys impregnating a married woman and not married to her, courts can be flexible but not forgiving. The court's main purpose is the health & care of that baby. Another good reason to treat the married white spouses with RESPECT.
Both of you are correct the same as i am with my earlier statement. Of course i don't know the laws of every country or state. But AFAiK the differences in respect with marriage and childbirth within a marriage are for the most part only minimal.Not in every country. Here where I live in Germany, the ******* does not have to pay baby support if you can prove that the baby is not his own. I don’t know what it’s like in other countries and sometimes even United States. It’s different from states to state.
No you're wrong. Go reread your Nolo Law Skool Fur Dummies book.View attachment 7471825 ..... what's your source??? Its the person's name who appears on the birth certificate, however, if the baby doesn't belong to the male spouse, he doesn't have to accept it or be responsible for it. Many times if the baby is not biologically confirmed his, the male spouse will refuse to sign the birth certificate, taking ownership. A simple DNA test will prove that, and he may have to protest responsibility in court.
Biological vs Paternal ... for those guys impregnating a married woman and not married to her, courts can be flexible but not forgiving. The court's main purpose is the health & care of that baby. Another good reason to treat the married white spouses with RESPECT.
Absolutely beautiful
Absolutely amazing beautifulIn other cases, a wife needs to breed, and a husband must decide whether to submit, or compete...
View attachment 6455657
You’re raising a baby fathered by BBC, aren’t you?Don’t know yet
Give her the elbow.To some cuckold couples, this wouldn't seem like a question they need be hesitant to answer, especially those who indulge in wanting their wives bred. But I'd still like to ask the question: Let's say the wife becomes accidentally (or not) pregnanted by her black lover, what would be your reaction to this?
It’s hot she had 2 bull babies and none of yours. How do you feel she’s done it with him and not you?Here's a little back to back action for y'all!
Both times my wife was pregnant with bull's baby, left was first and a female, right was second and a male. Two individuals we absolutely love to death to this day!
Both babies have same *******?Here's a little back to back action for y'all!
Both times my wife was pregnant with bull's baby, left was first and a female, right was second and a male. Two individuals we absolutely love to death to this day
Very hot"Fill my kitty with your.. oh god" haha! classic!
I have a friend that was married for three years. They ended up getting divorced. His lawyer demanded a DNA test on both children. The test came back the children were not his. He was into sharing her with his friends and let his friends cum in her. He didn’t have to pay her any baby supportView attachment 7471825 ..... what's your source??? Its the person's name who appears on the birth certificate, however, if the baby doesn't belong to the male spouse, he doesn't have to accept it or be responsible for it. Many times if the baby is not biologically confirmed his, the male spouse will refuse to sign the birth certificate, taking ownership. A simple DNA test will prove that, and he may have to protest responsibility in court.
Biological vs Paternal ... for those guys impregnating a married woman and not married to her, courts can be flexible but not forgiving. The court's main purpose is the health & care of that baby. Another good reason to treat the married white spouses with RESPECT.
What would you do? Would you wanna know?I have a friend that was married for three years. They ended up getting divorced. His lawyer demanded a DNA test on both children. The test came back the children were not his. He was into sharing her with his friends and let his friends cum in her. He didn’t have to pay her any baby support