Support For Third U.S. Political Party At High Point

WindsorBLKBull

Male
Gold Member
From
Canada
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Americans' desire for a third party has ticked up since last fall and now sits at a high in Gallup's trend. Sixty-two percent of U.S. adults say the "parties do such a poor job representing the American people that a third party is needed," an increase from 57% in September. Support for a third party has been elevated in recent years, including readings of 60% in 2013 and 2015 and 61% in 2017.

Meanwhile, 33% of Americans believe the two major political parties are doing an adequate job representing the public, the smallest percentage expressing this view apart from the 26% reading in October 2013.

1615739686153.png

The latest results are from a Jan. 21-Feb. 2 poll. The survey was conducted before recent news reports that dozens of government officials in prior Republican administrations were in discussions to form an anti-Donald Trump third political party.

The survey found Americans' favorable opinion of the Republican Party has declined to 37%, while 48% view the Democratic Party positively. The poll also shows 50% of U.S. adults identifying as political independents, the highest percentage Gallup has ever measured in a single poll.

Gallup first asked about the need for a third party in 2003. At that time, most Americans did not think it was necessary, with 56% saying the parties were doing an adequate job representing the American people and 40% saying a third party was needed.

In several election years -- 2006, 2008 and 2012 -- Americans were divided as to whether a third party was needed, but since 2012, Americans have consistently favored the idea.

Majority of Republicans Now Favor Third Party


Independents are usually much more likely than Republicans or Democrats to favor a third political party, but in the current poll, Republicans are nearly as likely as independents to hold this view, 63% to 70%. That represents a dramatic shift for Republicans since last September when 40% favored a third party.

Republicans' current level of support for a third party is also the highest Gallup has measured for Republicans or Democrats in Gallup's trend. The previous high was 54% for Democrats in 2018. Currently, 46% of Democrats endorse a third party, down from 52% in September.

1615739775850.png

Republicans' record desire for a third party comes at a time when they are deciding whether to remain loyal to Trump or to move on from him.

Currently, 68% of Republicans prefer that Trump remain the party leader, while 31% want the party to have a new leader. Republican-leaning independents, however, are divided, with 47% wanting Trump to continue leading and 51% preferring a new voice.

Republicans' preferences for a third party are similar among those who want Trump to continue to lead the party and among those who prefer a new leader.

An analysis that takes into account preference for a third party -- and preference of Trump leading the party -- finds that 41% of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents both favor a third party and want Trump to be the leader of the GOP. Meanwhile, 28% favor a third party but want a new leader for the GOP. The remaining 31% of Republicans and Republican-leaners either don't want a third party or don't have a preference on Trump's future role in party politics.

More Republicans Want the Party to Move to the Right Than to the Center


The survey asked Republicans and Republican-leaning independents what direction they would like to see the party move in the future. A 40% plurality want the party to become more conservative, while 34% want it to stay the same and 24% to become more moderate. While Republican identifiers are about twice as likely to say the party should become more conservative than moderate (44% to 21%), Republican-leaning independents are split, with 36% wanting it to move further to the right of the ideological spectrum and 30% to move toward the center.

Democrats Divided on the Direction of Their Party


Democrats' internal divisions between its moderate and liberal wings appear to be muted for now, following the party's victory in the presidential election and its regaining a Senate majority while maintaining a House majority. Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents are evenly divided on the direction their party should go -- 34% want it to become more liberal, 34% more moderate, and 31% to stay where it is.

Democratic identifiers tilt more toward wanting the party to go in a liberal direction (34%) than a moderate one (25%), while Democratic-leaning independents tilt toward wanting the party to become more moderate, 42% to 35%.

Bottom Line


Americans' appetite for a third party has never been greater in Gallup's nearly two decades of polling on the subject, and now a majority of Republicans are joining the usual majority of independents in wanting that option. The GOP is struggling to find its way in the post-Trump world, but party leaders hope it can unite in time to make gains in the 2022 elections. The possibility still exists that a pro-Trump or anti-Trump third party will splinter off from the Republican Party before then. However, that is something that party leaders like Republican National Committee Chair Ronna McDaniel and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy are trying to prevent.

Support for Third U.S. Political Party at High Point (gallup.com)
 
Democrats Divided on the Direction of Their Party
This is really dangerous; by running another Democrat (far left) it only splits the total Democrat votes necessary to retain control of the White House. Democrats do seem to be slow learners ... seeing the mess that became of the Republican party when the Tea Party split them up and their moderates left.
 
This is really dangerous; by running another Democrat (far left) it only splits the total Democrat votes necessary to retain control of the White House. Democrats do seem to be slow learners ... seeing the mess that became of the Republican party when the Tea Party split them up and their moderates left.
the rnc won the house, senate, and held the white house for 6 years after the tea party came on the scene

they were doing really well until trump came in
 
the rnc won the house, senate, and held the white house for 6 years after the tea party came on the scene

they were doing really well until trump came in
There's a BIG PICTURE to that, however, the TeaBaggers had awesome financing through the likes of the Koch Bros, etc ... they were actually running negative ads on TV against other Republicans AND financing other Republican candidates to run against them. TP was actually starting to fall apart on them & one of the big reasons we have political polarization now. Republicans haven't done a THING to help the US and workers since 2010. They simply run negative & false ads against any candidate they encounter. A real cancer in the party of NO.
 
There's a BIG PICTURE to that, however, the TeaBaggers had awesome financing through the likes of the Koch Bros, etc ... they were actually running negative ads on TV against other Republicans AND financing other Republican candidates to run against them.
yeah they totally primaried each other, and the common wisdom was that it would destroy their electability

but then it didn't and they're still around
 
they're still around
Their NUMBERS are dwindling fast ... we had 4 TeaBag Republicans in NC, and after Tom Tillis leaves ... we'll have ONE and he actually has a moderate Republican challenger this time around.

One of the Koch Bros died a couple years ago, and the other is not supporting the Republicans with huge donations anymore.
 
fair.

anyway the DNC has traditionally been the "big tent" party, with a lot of loose alliances. it seems like the only thing different now is that the RNC is also becoming a big tent party (coexisting with the more insane parts of MAGA crowd).

neither party will split though; it's just not viable for winning elections
 
This is really dangerous; by running another Democrat (far left) it only splits the total Democrat votes necessary to retain control of the White House. Democrats do seem to be slow learners ... seeing the mess that became of the Republican party when the Tea Party split them up and their moderates left.
@MacNfries

It wouldn't be another effort to establish another version of the Demoncratic Party.

It would be a party, that would actually represent the people, not the corporations, or donors
 
@MacNfries

It wouldn't be another effort to establish another version of the Demoncratic Party.

It would be a party, that would actually represent the people, not the corporations, or donors
....No party is really about representing "the people" so don't nibble on that low hanging fruit. Its all about "power", not the people. Democrats just realize that supporting agendas that are favorable to the majority is the way to go, thus why all the gerrymandering, voter fraud BS, and voter suppression that appears coming from the Right. The Right isn't willing to abandon the Ronald Reagan "hocus-pocus" Trickle Down just yet. The same results as what happened to the Republicans in 2010-2016 would be expected to happen to the Democrats if it was a 3rd liberal party..
....So, what would that "third party" look like ... more liberal, more moderate, more conservative? The ideal, perfect third party would strive to represent negotiable agenda which BOTH Parties could support. Currently, its the extremists from both parties that keep the parties overall polarized. The further away from "center moderates" the more likely that third party (as proven by the Tea Party & Dixiecrats in history) would draw voters from the primary parties. If you recall, for example, the Tea Party never really struck out on their own, They had awesome financial support and unhappy Republicans to draw their membership and take control of the Republican party ... it was devastating and why the polarization developed. We can thank Newt Gingrich for the government "polarization" we have.
....A successful third party would be one that could fit between the two existing parties, making itself the moderate party, otherwise, it impacts one or both of the existing parties on election days. Unfortunately, its still about "political power" ... the Tea Party made the moderate Republicans think that they were there to add strength & support to the Republican party, but it wasn't. Their goal was to take over the Republican party with their "All Or None" dirty tactics. The freezing of government over "spending caps" for example. Both parties spend ridiculously when their party is in power. It only makes sense, however, if you cut revenue you have to adjust spending, establish new spending debts and/or expect your tax cuts to invigorate the economy so vigorously as to create a lot of public spending. Cutting entitlements would have made things worse for Republicans, thus the ceiling debt continued to rise. When Democrats got into office, their attempts to re-adjust the spending deficit with new taxes OR to reverse the tax cuts of Republicans only got Republicans to harmonize on "Democrats Are Raising Your Taxes". Thus neither party did what was really right for the country ... it was about "power" to stay in office.

Explainer: Political Polarization in the United States | Facing History and Ourselves
Portland, polarization, and the crisis of the Republican Party (msn.com)
When Partisanship Got Polarized | Brandeis Magazine
How Newt Gingrich Destroyed American Politics - The Atlantic
Everyone wants a third party! But ... - CNNPolitics
 
Last edited:
Back
Top