Remember The Day the SUPREME COURT STARTED TAKING AWAY YOUR RIGHTS.

The Arranger

Male
Gold Member
To day the Supreme Court stuck down Roe vs Wade. Which Gave the Right on How to Live Your Life and the Right to Privacy. That is what this right was. Yes it made Abortion Legal. What is next Gay Marriage. Voting Rights. Make no mistake this decision will change the way you live. Will they bring back laws banning mixed marriages.

Yes I live North of the Border with the USA. However we studied you constitution in civics classes. This was the subject to a three week discussion way back in high school.

Do they even teach Civics Classes in the USA any more. So young people will know their rights.

This ruling does affect me where I live. However it will affect you.
 
To day the Supreme Court stuck down Roe vs Wade. Which Gave the Right on How to Live Your Life and the Right to Privacy. That is what this right was. Yes it made Abortion Legal. What is next Gay Marriage. Voting Rights. Make no mistake this decision will change the way you live. Will they bring back laws banning mixed marriages.

Yes I live North of the Border with the USA. However we studied you constitution in civics classes. This was the subject to a three week discussion way back in high school.

Do they even teach Civics Classes in the USA any more. So young people will know their rights.

This ruling does affect me where I live. However it will affect you.
it could go on.....what about the 14th amendment now.....parental rights and etc..........think the right may have opened a can of worms.....especially when 3/4 of the country WANTED to keep Roe
but this could go on......and with Thomas on a rampage....who knows..........and his little statement yesterday.....first time in history a supreme court judge has asked for a suit to come before him

they need some control over the supreme court to get them to follow the will of the people and not a party


Roberts not doing or saying anything.....he is relegated to holding the piss bucket!........or in some circles it could be called a Missouri urinal
 
Last edited:

Protest Latest: NY, DC Marches Grow as Justice’s Home Targeted​


(Bloomberg) -- Thousands of demonstrators in major cities across the US from New York to Los Angeles held largely peaceful protests in reaction to the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the 1973 landmark Roe v. Wade. In many places, crowds picked up after people got off work for the day, with protesters chanting, marching and carrying signs.

Roe v. Wade protected the constitutional right to abortion. Overturning the ruling leaves it to individual states to decide whether abortions are allowed, and in what circumstances. The May 2 leak of a draft opinion to strike down Roe sparked nationwide protests from abortion supporters.
The Guttmacher Institute, a reproductive health research group, said 26 states are “certain or likely” to ban or limit abortion in the absence of Roe, while 16 states have laws that protect the right to abortion.

Tear Gas Fired on Protesters in Arizona (12:30 a.m.)​

In Phoenix, SWAT team members fired tear gas on thousands of abortion rights protesters at the Arizona Capitol late Friday, where lawmakers were finishing their 2022 session, AP reported. The Senate briefly evacuated to the basement, the report cited Democratic State Senator Martin Quezada as saying.

Troopers deployed the gas after protesters attempted to break the glass at the Senate building and after some monuments were vandalized, NBC’s local affiliate 12News reported, citing a statement from the Arizona Department of Public Safety. The DPS didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment sent by Bloomberg News late Friday.

Protesters Target Home of Justice Thomas (7:55 p.m.)​

About 20 protesters were gathered outside the entrance to a residential community where Justice Clarence Thomas resides in the Washington suburb of Fairfax, Virginia. Several people had megaphones and other noisemakers like tambourines, pans, and a bucket.

Justice Samuel Alito wrote the court’s opinion, and was joined by Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.

Protesters called on Congress and the Jan. 6 Committee to investigate the role of Thomas’s wife, Ginni Thomas, in encouraging the Trump
administration to challenge the 2020 election results, followed by chants of “lock her up.”

Protesters have periodically gathered outside the homes of conservative justices since Politico published a leaked copy of the Supreme Court’s draft decision last month.

Protesters Fret Contraception, Gay Marriage in Peril (7:45 p.m.)​

In sunny San Francisco, a group of people gathered at the historical Ferry Building and marched down bustling Market Street. Just around the corner, the National Mobilization for Reproductive Justice took over the street in front of the Philip Burton Federal building and courthouse.

At the same time, crowds flocked to the intersection of Powell and Market Street at the urging of the Party for Socialism and Liberation. More than a thousand converged on the steps of City Hall, chanting “abort the court” as dozens of police, some in bullet proof vests, watched on expressionless. Local buses in the city center were diverted during rush hour as hundreds of protesters sat down across a busy intersection of Market Street, causing travel chaos.
I don’t have to worry about reproduction anymore,” said Natalie Kirkland, a sales representative. “But I’m here for the young girls and women who do. After this they’re coming for contraception, gay marriage and women’s healthcare.”

Atlanta Questions Democracy (7:28 p.m.)​

In downtown Atlanta, more than a thousand protesters gathered in response to the ruling. With helicopters hovering overhead and the sun setting on another steamy June evening, dozens of the city’s homeless stretched out on a wall in front of the gold-domed state capitol building. And on the rear stairs facing Liberty Plaza, protesters chanted and cheered. “This demonstrates our country is not a democratic system,” said Kelsea Bond. “Most people did not want Roe v. Wade overturned.”

Cecilia Fire Thunder, Dawn Wooten Tributes (6:35 p.m.)​

Protesters converged in New York City’s Washington Square. Several protesters are carrying signs that pay homage to women who fought to preserve abortion rights, like Cecilia Fire Thunder who led an effort to provide abortion care at Pine Ridge Reservation and Dawn Wooten who exposed ****** sterilizations at ICE detention centers. Other signs commemorate lives lost to unsafe abortions like Rosie Jiménez, a Texas resident who died after receiving a risky procedure in 1978.

Community groups are handing out shirts that read “stand with Black women” and “ban off our bodies,” while street sellers offer pride flags and pro-choice pins.
Jason Au, a 25-year-old photographer visiting New York from Los Angeles, had already been planning to come to Washington Square Park on Friday to hand out free handmade bracelets to people who agree to call someone they love. In today’s context, he said the initiative is helping making protesters’ day “a little bit lighter.”

B.abies, Elderly, Men and Women Rally Together (6:30 p.m.)​

Protesters were still joining the crowd outside Washington’s Supreme Court as they headed home from work, even though police blocked off many entrances to the area. People of all age groups -- from babies to the elderly -- gathered. They held up hundreds of handmade signs and posters handed out by abortion rights groups.

Scott Cecil, who works in the non-profit sector, was among them. “I am never going to have to worry about being ****** to be pregnant and give birth, but more than half of the population does have to worry about it, so I feel like it’s my duty to be here and support those people,” Cecil, 40, said.

Representative Omar’s Fiery Remarks (5:30 p.m.)​

Hundreds of protesters and lawmakers, mobilized by Planned Parenthood, assembled outside Union Station in Washington, DC, where Representative Ilhan Omar, of Minnesota, delivered a fiery address as commuters drove by. “I am sick and tired of having to stand up to people who hide behind the Constitution to limit our right to it,” she said.
She spoke about the perceived religious motivations of members of the conservative-majority US Supreme Court, as “people who think their god is superior to ours.”

Omar, who is Muslim, spoke about abortion as a separation of church and state, as well as a privacy matter.

New York’s Vow of No Silence (5:20 p.m.)​

A few hundred gathered in Union Square in New York with protesters carrying signs reading “keep your laws off my body” and chants like “not the church, not the state, women must decide their fate.”

“We won’t be silent. That’s what we’re trying to say. We recognize that this fight continues to go on,” said Betty Maloney, a 75-year-old organizer. She added that the action did not focus exclusively on abortion and also called for change related to healthcare, sterilization, and childcare issues.

Jade Runk, a 33-year-old model, wore a white dress splattered with red paint and carried a sign that said “Thousands of people will die.”

“It’s about so much more than abortion. It’s about a persons right to choose to live their own life,” she said.

NYC Stepping Up Security (2:30 p.m.)​

New York Mayor Eric Adams said the city would welcome people from out of state who were seeking abortion. He said he is reaching out to the city’s businesses to help fund transportation and other needs.

“There’s no reason our corporations can’t come together and put together some form of pot to help those seeking the right to have an abortion,” he said at City Hall.

Adams said the city was also stepping up security following the court decision and ahead of the Pride Parade, which returns in-person for the first time since 2019. That includes working with clinics and other places around who to notify around suspicious packages.

“We are going to remain vigilant at all these locations so no one is in harm’s way or threatened or harassed for a right to have an abortion,” he said, noting there was a scare this morning around a suspicious package.
About 400 spectators gathered around City Hall to listen to Adams’s statements after the Supreme Court’s decision. The steps leading up to the hall were packed, with many saying they stopped by during their lunch hour to express support for New York’s expansion of abortion access to accommodate the expected influx of people.

Emily Kobeley, 22, a recent graduate of nursing school who was visiting New York from Pennsylvania, came to hear Adams speak.

“I don’t think you can go into health care and not believe in bodily autonomy and the right to an abortion. I don’t think those two line up,” she said. “It’s important that all my patients understand that they have the right to do whatever they want with their bodies because that’s what I’m there for, to advocate for that.”

‘We Won’t Go Back’ (2:15 p.m.)​

Bans Off Our Bodies, a national campaign led by abortion-rights groups including Planned Parenthood and Women’s March, urged people to join a rally “to demand control over our bodies, our lives and our futures.” Rallies were planned at federal courthouses across the US.

Rallies in NYC, LA (12:30 p.m.)​

Annie Day, an organizer for the Los Angeles chapter of abortion rights group Rise Up 4 Abortion, said the group is organizing a protest in front of the US Courthouse in downtown Los Angeles from noon on Friday, and they’ll begin to march through streets in the evening.

“I’m deeply furious. It’s a gut punch,” Day said. “This decision must not stand. We’re going into the streets to fight for legal abortion on demand.”

The group is planning for daily protests.

“People should drop out of their jobs, cancel whatever they’re doing and go into the streets,” Day said.

Also in LA, the Women’s March Foundation plans to wear red and gather at City Hall at 5pm .

“Women and our allies — who make up the majority of the country — will not stand idly by and watch our rights stripped from us without recourse,” Executive Director Emiliana Guereca said in a statement. . We will fight back. We will take to the streets in red to show the ******* they have on their hands.”

In New York City, rallies were planned Friday in Union Square and Washington Square.

Capitol Police in Riot Gear (11:45 p.m.)​

The crowd continues to grow outside the Supreme Court, largely on the pro-choice side. About two dozen Capitol Police wearing riot gear just showed up.

A major police presence built by noon in Washington’s Capitol Hill neighborhood, by the Court and the Capitol complex. Multiple streets were closed off with barricades, and Metropolitan Police Department squad cars and SUVs were parked on streets.

Ocasio-Cortez Appears Outside Court (11:30 a.m.)​

Progressive US Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is drawing attention outside of the Supreme Court building. Pro-choice protesters were happy with her arrival, but anti-abortion protesters are yelling at her: “Why do you want babies to die?”

ACLU Says Find Nearby Rally (11:15 p.m.)​

The American Civil Liberties Union urged demonstrators on Twitter to find a nearby rally.

‘Absolutely Monumental’ Decision (11 a.m.)​

The crowd had grown from hundreds to more than a thousand by 11 a.m. in Washington. The anti-abortion groups have clustered to the right side of the court, with the pro-abortion groups on the left. The anti-abortion groups have been praying into megaphones, as well as playing music.

“Today is just absolutely monumental, especially for the pro-life movement that is diverse, progressives like myself, atheists like myself, members of the LGBTQ community, this is huge for us,” said Kristin Turner, executive director of Pro-Life San Francisco and Communications Director for the Progressive Anti-Abortion Uprising. “It shows people it doesn’t matter your religious views, your ideological background, your race, your gender, anything, you absolutely can and should be in support of protecting unborn human beings who are just like us in every considerable way.”

D.C. Crowd Outside Court Grows: (10:45 a.m.)​

Even before the decision was announced, police officers with bikes and motorcycles created a barrier in front of the Supreme Court building which had previously been fenced off.

Demonstrators opposing abortion rights who were gathered outside announced the result and then erupted in cheers. Solemn protesters supporting abortion rights held signs and used megaphones to criticize the decision after its release.

The crowd of several hundred people remained peaceful after the announcement.
 
I think what some ppl are missing is that the Supreme Court is there to uphold the laws under the constitution.

Legalized abortion is not under the constitution and Roe/Wade never should have been something legalized under federal law to begin with....

The Supreme Court basically just gave it back to the states to decide.

Correct me if I am wrong?
 
I think what some ppl are missing is that the Supreme Court is there to uphold the laws under the constitution.

Legalized abortion is not under the constitution and Roe/Wade never should have been something legalized under federal law to begin with....

The Supreme Court basically just gave it back to the states to decide.

Correct me if I am wrong?

the rationale for Roe was that people have a right to privacy.

the court has said there's no actual right to privacy in the constitution, which means other decisions based on a right to privacy are up for similar review. gay marriage, blow jobs, anal sex, interracial marriage, all are legal in the US because the court interpreted a right to privacy
 
I think what some ppl are missing is that the Supreme Court is there to uphold the laws under the constitution.

Legalized abortion is not under the constitution and Roe/Wade never should have been something legalized under federal law to begin with....

The Supreme Court basically just gave it back to the states to decide.

Correct me if I am wrong?
you are wrong
 
This decision is first of all a relief in the face of the monstrous act represented by abortion, the massification of which is a symptom of profound moral degeneration : what is the future of a people who k.ill their children, of a State who consecrates its destruction ?

But it is also the lesson of fifty years of tenacious efforts by conservatives, who, after Roe vs. Wade, carried out a slow and patient work of legal training, of entry into legal societies and the courts of justice, of propagation in law faculties, bar associations and jurisdictions. The Federalist Society is the best known, there are others. This is how conservative magistrates were able to populate the lower courts, then those of appeal, until reaching the Supreme Court, distinguished by a Donald Trump to whom we can recognize this record.

It is finally a formidable slap inflicted on the progressives who present their positions as natural and carried by the wind of history : the most influential country in the world, the one which had innovated in 1967 by establishing, the first, a right to Abortion, which did not exist anywhere else in the Western world, the one from which the ideological slogans of decadence originate, goes into reverse and demonstrates that this "right" is fictitious, that it is based only on an abuse, that no tradition supports it, that it is neither essential, nor absolute, nor eternal, and that what is presented to us as a definitive acquisition is only an artifice of language of some evildoers and their crowds of followers.

There is no "sense of History", no arrow of progress, there is none morally and even less materially (that is to say, as the progressives profess, as resulting of a physical law of perfection under the dialectic of technique and reason). We must reject all the arguments of our opponents in this area, and the Supreme Court of the United States has just provided us with a fantastic example to support us.
 
There is no "sense of History", no arrow of progress, there is none morally and even less materially (that is to say, as the progressives profess, as resulting of a physical law of perfection under the dialectic of technique and reason). We must reject all the arguments of our opponents in this area, and the Supreme Court of the United States has just provided us with a fantastic example to support us.

uhhhh, what?

what are you saying exactly? you want to go back to slavery? to feudalism?

the SCOTUS showed their great example by lying their asses off during confirmation hearings. not sure I would base my moral heroes on liars.
 
Interesting. Seventy five percent of Americans believe that women have the right to choose. So when they vote out all the conservatives in the state governments and then the conservative judges how will the conservatives feel then.

On the Donald well it looks like he has jumped the shark if the testimony on the Jan 6th to be believed. Even FOX is having trouble spinning this one.
 
It is finally a formidable slap inflicted on the progressives who present their positions as natural and carried by the wind of history : the most influential country in the world, t, a right the one which had innovated in 1967 by establishing, the firsto Abortion, which did not exist anywhere else in the Western world, the one from which the ideological slogans of decadence originate, goes into reverse and demonstrates that this "right" is fictitious, that it is based only on an abuse, that no tradition supports it, that it is neither essential, nor absolute, nor eternal, and that what is presented to us as a definitive acquisition is only an artifice of language of some evildoers and their crowds of followers.
It takes a special kind of lack of self awareness to come on a sex site, advocating adultery, and talk about sexual morality.
And when I say that, I'm being polite.
Your dates are as wrong as your position.
Abortion was legalized in Russia in 1920s. In the 1930s Denmark, Poland Sweden and Mexico followed. Japan and other European countries followed in the 30s, 40's and 50s. The UK and Canada in the 60's and pretty much the US and the rest of western world in the 70s.
Today, a woman has the right to choose in most Westernized countries, and if her life or health is in danger, most countries on earth, except inside this one.
 
It takes a special kind of lack of self awareness to come on a sex site, advocating adultery, and talk about sexual morality.
And when I say that, I'm being polite.
Your dates are as wrong as your position.
Abortion was legalized in Russia in 1920s. In the 1930s Denmark, Poland Sweden and Mexico followed. Japan and other European countries followed in the 30s, 40's and 50s. The UK and Canada in the 60's and pretty much the US and the rest of western world in the 70s.
Today, a woman has the right to choose in most Westernized countries, and if her life or health is in danger, most countries on earth, except inside this one.
Don’t worry. It’s only for a short time.

two things may happen.

1 Since most Americans believe in a woman’s right to choose, when the mid term happen watch the Republican go down one this one subject both federally and in the states.

2 Since there are 13 judicial districts the president will create 4 more judges which he will appoint. Problem solved. Two can play stack the court.
 
2 Since there are 13 judicial districts the president will create 4 more judges which he will appoint. Problem solved. Two can play stack the court.
Ummm...you need to go back to high school civics class. The president can't create more SCOTUS judge seats. That requires an act of Congress.

So tell us which 10 Republican Senators will vote to end a filibuster of any bill to give Biden the opportunity to stack the SCOTUS with democrats.

Your item #1 is at least a constitutional possible option, but polls aren't looking good for you. In the latest fivethirtyeight polling projections, the Republicans still have an 87% chance of gaining control of the House...that's down just 1% after the recent Roe decision. Control of the Senate is a tossup in their combined polling results with Republicans still having a slight edge on gaining control.

The American voters are much more concerned about Biden's double digit inflation, paying double the price for gas they did under Trump, not being able to find formula to feed their b.abies, and so on, and so on, and so on...



 
This decision is first of all a relief in the face of the monstrous act represented by abortion, the massification of which is a symptom of profound moral degeneration : what is the future of a people who k.ill their children, of a State who consecrates its destruction ?

But it is also the lesson of fifty years of tenacious efforts by conservatives, who, after Roe vs. Wade, carried out a slow and patient work of legal training, of entry into legal societies and the courts of justice, of propagation in law faculties, bar associations and jurisdictions. The Federalist Society is the best known, there are others. This is how conservative magistrates were able to populate the lower courts, then those of appeal, until reaching the Supreme Court, distinguished by a Donald Trump to whom we can recognize this record.

It is finally a formidable slap inflicted on the progressives who present their positions as natural and carried by the wind of history : the most influential country in the world, the one which had innovated in 1967 by establishing, the first, a right to Abortion, which did not exist anywhere else in the Western world, the one from which the ideological slogans of decadence originate, goes into reverse and demonstrates that this "right" is fictitious, that it is based only on an abuse, that no tradition supports it, that it is neither essential, nor absolute, nor eternal, and that what is presented to us as a definitive acquisition is only an artifice of language of some evildoers and their crowds of followers.

There is no "sense of History", no arrow of progress, there is none morally and even less materially (that is to say, as the progressives profess, as resulting of a physical law of perfection under the dialectic of technique and reason). We must reject all the arguments of our opponents in this area, and the Supreme Court of the United States has just provided us with a fantastic example to support us.
well thanks for your input.....you might want to clean your face....there is still a little ******* there......when you put out that much some is bound to stick to your mouth cheeks
 
Ummm...you need to go back to high school civics class. The president can't create more SCOTUS judge seats. That requires an act of Congress.

So tell us which 10 Republican Senators will vote to end a filibuster of any bill to give Biden the opportunity to stack the SCOTUS with democrats.
You know that civics class you skipped?
You're right, Biden would make the appointment. His point exactly in the previous post.
Your item #1 is at least a constitutional possible option, but polls aren't looking good for you. In the latest fivethirtyeight polling projections, the Republicans still have an 87% chance of gaining control of the House...that's down just 1% after the recent Roe decision. Control of the Senate is a tossup in their combined polling results with Republicans still having a slight edge on gaining control.
When is that election? November? Well hold Trump's beer, he's just begun fucking it up. Just like he did to himself.
The American voters are much more concerned about Biden's double digit inflation, paying double the price for gas they did under Trump, not being able to find formula to feed their b.abies, and so on, and so on, and so on...
True. Baby formula crisis is over. Nice little line but it's been handled, instead of blamed.


Love that you all swear by Nate Silver, keep watching.
 
Ummm...you need to go back to high school civics class. The president can't create more SCOTUS judge seats. That requires an act of Congress.

So tell us which 10 Republican Senators will vote to end a filibuster of any bill to give Biden the opportunity to stack the SCOTUS with democrats.

Your item #1 is at least a constitutional possible option, but polls aren't looking good for you. In the latest fivethirtyeight polling projections, the Republicans still have an 87% chance of gaining control of the House...that's down just 1% after the recent Roe decision. Control of the Senate is a tossup in their combined polling results with Republicans still having a slight edge on gaining control.

The American voters are much more concerned about Biden's double digit inflation, paying double the price for gas they did under Trump, not being able to find formula to feed their b.abies, and so on, and so on, and so on...



1st off I am a Canadian. And it really pissed me off that we had to take a course in grade 10 history class on American Civics around the US constitution. Now I am thank full that we did. Because it lead me to learning a few more interesting things about the USA.

Like the fact that the US Governments believe in Little Green Men from mars. How do I know. Well in 1969 when the us put a man on the moon three days later the US government passed three laws. 1 It is against the law to talk to some thing getting off a UFO. 2 It is against the law to get on a UFO willingly. 3 It is against the law to answer the question “ Take me to your Leader”. No I am not making this up.

Not sure if the repealed this one however it used to be against the law to smoke on 5th Ave in New York punishment was 20 years in Sing Sing. Why in days of old the side walks were made of wood soaked in creasote. So where most of the buildings on 5th Ave.

one off the reasons for the war of independence was “No Taxation with out Representation”.

So who is the senator for Washington DC. Or who is the congressperson. Not think they have either. So do they pay Tax’s.

Why does both Hawaii and Alaska have Interstate High ways. I know what you are thinking. Ever state has Inter State High Ways. When was the last time you drove to Hawaii or Alaska as neither touch any of the lower 48 States.

Yes I agree that inflation is a problem. Gas prices are a problem. In Canada we have these problems too. Our Prime Minister has No Concept of monetary policy he is a one trick pony. Green energy. However is does have nice hair and wear cool socks.
 
Last edited:
1st off I am a Canadian. And it really pissed me off that we had to take a course in grade 10 history class on American Civics around the US constitution. Now I am thank full that we did. Because it lead me to learning a few more interesting things about the USA.

Like the fact that the US Governments believe in Little Green Men from mars. How do I know. Well in 1969 when the us put a man on the moon three days later the US government passed three laws. 1 It is against the law to talk to some thing getting off a UFO. 2 It is against the law to get on a UFO willingly. 3 It is against the law to answer the question “ Take me to your Leader”. No I am not making this up.

Not sure if the repealed this one however it used to be against the law to smoke on 5th Ave in New York punishment was 20 years in Sing Sing. Why in days of old the side walks were made of wood soaked in creasote. So where most of the buildings on 5th Ave.

one off the reasons for the war of independence was “No Taxation with out Representation”.

So who is the senator for Washington DC. Or who is the congressperson. Not think they have either. So do they pay Tax’s.

Why does both Hawaii and Alaska have Interstate High ways. I know what you are thinking. Ever state has Inter State High Ways. When was the last time you drove to Hawaii or Alaska as neither touch any of the lower 48 States.
Was any of that rambling supposed to be relevant to the topic at hand?

Once again:

Your claim number two is constitutional nonsense. The president cannot create a new judge position on the SCOTUS. Congress must initiate that. So tell us which 10 Republican Senators will all vote to end a filibuster over such a bill.

Your claim number one appears to be practical nonsense. Polling clearly says Republicans are expected to gain seats, likely taking control of the House and possibly taking control of the Senate. This is still true in polls taken after the recent Roe decision. People here are pissed off at the Biden debacle....that what double digit inflation and the price of gas doubling will do to the populace.
 
Like the fact that the US Governments believe in Little Green Men from mars. How do I know. Well in 1969 when the us put a man on the moon three days later the US government passed three laws. 1 It is against the law to talk to some thing getting off a UFO. 2 It is against the law to get on a UFO willingly. 3 It is against the law to answer the question “ Take me to your Leader”. No I am not making this up.
Yes you are making this up...well, not really, just parroting UFO wacko urban legend. The US has never passed the laws as you cite them...if they did, prove me wrong...should be a piece of cake for you to cite the actual code.

Here in reality land, the tiny grain of truth this bullshit idea grew out of was US code 14 CFR § 1211. This was passed in 1969 due to the Apollo 11 mission. It was highly unlikely that there was any life on the moon and even if some form of microbes were there, even less chance they could be infectious to life forms from Earth. Despite being an exceedingly low risk, the risk of Apollo astronauts bringing back an infectious moon microbe we had zero immunity to wasn't zero. So prudence demanded a reasonable level of caution. Hence the law was passed. Apollo astronauts from the first three moon landings were all placed in quarantine upon return as required by the law. Anyone exposed to them or the capsule & materials they brought back could also be f0rced into quarantine. By the time Apollo 15 came back, NASA had decided this quarantine was unnecessary. Eventually the law was removed from the books.

In the foreseeable future, we probably need to put a similar law back on the books. We're heading back to the moon with manned missions in just a few more years. Manned missions to Mars may not be too far off. The risk of bringing back an infectious microbe from Mars is still low, but higher than it ever was for the moon. We know liquid water flowed on the surface of Mars in the past, making it a potential home for Earth like life forms. There's interesting evidence today regarding things like atmospheric methane cycles which suggest the possibility there is life of some form alive on the planet today...although that is just one possible explanation for the methane.
 
Last edited:
Why does both Hawaii and Alaska have Interstate High ways. I know what you are thinking. Ever state has Inter State High Ways. When was the last time you drove to Hawaii or Alaska as neither touch any of the lower 48 States.
Not sure why you think this has anything to do with the SCOTUS and our rights, but if you want the education...

Yes, there are interstate highways in the states of Hawaii and Alaska. They were clearly named interstates in an effort to piss off George Carlin.

But why focus on Hawaii and Alaska? We have "interstate" highways that exist solely within the city limits of a single city. For example, Interstate 235 here in KS is a whole 16 miles long, all within the city limits of Wichita. There's many other such examples around the US.

The simple fact is they are named as such because they are all part of the "Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense Highways". A large driver of the interstate highway system was national defense with a perceived need for better ability to move military equipment around the country. Notice how those interstates in Hawaii connect military bases...
 
Last edited:
Not sure why you think this has anything to do with the SCOTUS and our rights, but if you want the education...

Yes, there are interstate highways in the states of Hawaii and Alaska. They were clearly named interstates in an effort to piss off George Carlin.

But why focus on Hawaii and Alaska? We have "interstate" highways that exist solely within the city limits of a single city. For example, Interstate 235 here in KS is a whole 16 miles long, all within the city limits of Wichita. There's many other such examples around the US.

The simple fact is they are named as such because they are all part of the "Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense Highways". A large driver of the interstate highway system was national defense with a perceived need for better ability to move military equipment around the country. Notice how those interstates in Hawaii connect military bases...
First thanks for not calling me a bunch of names.

Second the moon man laws laws I got from an American Trivial book that is published annually called “The Uncle John’s Bathroom Reader” . All the stories are about five minutes long. Great read. Sorry not all stories are about Americans. I get one every year as a Christmas present from a guy I met on a school exchange when I was in high school. In exchange I send high books on Canadian geography, history none of it one the dry side. He teaches history at high school. Just sent him the last of the “Whiskey and Wickedness Trail series”. Also send him Hiking Trail Map books as birthday presents. This after he once told me he was too poor to take his new wife on a proper honeymoon after university. Some states are are easy. Some states are hard. So far I know they have hiked the Applation trail and are currently hiking the last of the Continental Trail after a few years off Due to covid.

Originally interstate highways were to connect states for interstate commerce not military purposes. Then it became a make work project to get presidents re elected. At one point it was difficult to go from one state to another with out going to a third state first.
 
Back
Top