Wake Up, America! Wake Up! PLEASE!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Are you saying that putting children in cages is good?
No, saying a Democrat Narrative is a Lie, M. Obama was playing politics, just like the AP and they are covering up for their own policies and actions. Hell the leftwing media used photos from the Obama time in office.

These are holding cells until they are process then the ******* are sent to a facility for them to be safer. But again if their parents didn't sell them, bring them to break the law or followed the rules this wouldn't happen.
 
To me, it really seems like either you believe it's a good thing to put children in cages, or it's a bad thing to put children in cages.

If you think it's good, then Obama is good for putting children in cages, but Trump is even better because he put way more children in cages.

If you think it's bad, then Obama is bad for putting children in cages, but Trump is worse because he put way more children in cages.

Seem pretty simple. Which one is it?

Or are you neutral on children in cages, and are happy with children being in cages or outside of cages?

So you believe ******* should be put on the streets returned to the sex trafficers or held in facilities where they go to school and are fed.
 
Children in "cages" is an unfortunate result of irresponsible parents who are arrested for breaking the law. Do I think it's good? I'm sorry but that is an ignorant question. So I guess your answer to the issue is let anyone and everyone enter our country without vetting? The Democrats are equally responsible for our immigration disaster. It is no different than a parent(s) getting arrested for committing crimes that end up with their children being separated from them. Sometimes for ever. Should we pass a law that gives immunity to parents whose criminal acts would result in being separated from their children. I will never understand the mentality behind the "pick and choose" which laws one should abide by.
The solution is very simple. If the parents follow the law they will never be separated from their *******.
Pick and choose.
Again, it's against the law to use someone's actual image as your own.
Are you going to turn yourself in, or call the cops on yourself and put up a fight?
 
Pick and choose.
Again, it's against the law to use someone's actual image as your own.
Are you going to turn yourself in, or call the cops on yourself and put up a fight?
That pic as well as all the videos on our profile was posted with my ex's permission. Now if it's an easily recognizable pic of her face different story. Even that is open to interpretation. If you guys are that good to be to recognize a person by looking a pic of their ass then you missed your calling!

Law
Is it illegal to post a picture of someone without their permission?

So is it lawful to post the photo without the subject's permission?

Assuming you took the photo lawfully (i.e. you took the photo with their permission), then you are free to post it (i.e. publish it).
 
That pic as well as all the videos on our profile was posted with my ex's permission. Now if it's an easily recognizable pic of her face different story. Even that is open to interpretation. If you guys are that good to be to recognize a person by looking a pic of their ass then you missed your calling!

Law
Is it illegal to post a picture of someone without their permission?

So is it lawful to post the photo without the subject's permission?

Assuming you took the photo lawfully (i.e. you took the photo with their permission), then you are free to post it (i.e. publish it).
Update your records. She can get you if she says it's casing her emotional distress, according to Florida's statutes,
If she drinks as much as you say, then she could be a little manic, and would be game for a civil suit.
It's called revenge porn and it doesn't matter if you had consent at the time:

Revenge porn – posting or distributing intimate photographs, images, or videos of another person on the Internet, without the person’s consent and in order to harass or upset that person-- is a crime, known as “sexual cyberharassment,” in Florida. (Fla. Stat. Ann. §784.049).
Revenge porn is a form of nonconsensual pornography (NCP), and most often involves a scorned or disgruntled ex-partner posting nude or revealing photos or videos of the other person, or photos or videos of the two engaged in sexual acts. These might be photos taken with permission, or photos that the victim shared with the poster while they were involved (perhaps suggestive selfies sent via text), but without permission to post publicly. Strangers also can engage in NCP, by hacking into others’ accounts or devices and posting images they find there.

Florida’s Sexual Cyberharassment Law
Under Florida’s sexual cyberharassment statute, it is a crime to publish a sexually explicit image of another person on the Internet that conveys the person’s identification information

  • without the person’s consent
  • without a legitimate purpose, and
  • with the intent to cause substantial emotional distress.
A first offense of sexual cyber harassment is a first degree misdemeanor and a second or subsequent offense is a third degree felony. A victim of sexual cyberharassment also may initiate a civil action under Florida’s cyber sexual harassment law, discussed further below.

The crime of sexual cyberharassment occurs in Florida if the act of posting the photo or video occurred in Florida or the harm occurred there. For example, if Joe posts a photo of Mary from a computer in Texas without her consent, but Mary lives in Florida and suffers serious emotional distress there, the crime has occurred in Florida.

What Is a “Sexually Explicit Image?”
A sexually explicit image is an image depicting nudity or a person engaged in sexual conduct. An image depicting nudity is one that shows enumerated parts or areas of the human body uncovered or covered only by see-through material. These body parts or areas include male or female genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or the female breast below the top of the nipple. An image of a covered penis in a turgid (aroused) state also is considered an image depicting nudity. (Fla. Stat. §847.001.)

An image of one or more persons engaged in sexual conduct includes acts of masturbation, actual or simulated sexual intercourse, and physical contact with a person’s clothed or unclothed genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or the female breast.
-------------------------

You must really trust your ex. Good for you.
 
You Ah you so stupid, I was making an Reductio ad absurdum.....I am a smarty

And then Wikipedia says- which you linked trying to show me how much smarter you are.

In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for '"reduction to absurdity"'), also known as argumentum ad absurdum (Latin for "argument to absurdity"), apagogical arguments, negation introduction or the appeal to extremes, is the form of argument that attempts to establish a claim by showing that the opposite scenario would lead to absurdity or contradiction It can be used to disprove a statement by showing that it would inevitably lead to a ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion,[3] or to prove a statement by showing that if it were false, then the result would be absurd or impossible

You gave a definition of socialism that couldn't include Venezeula, but also said Venezuela is socialist. I showed that it was a contradiction.

Rather than actually address what I've said, you spend untold pages throwing out insults and non-sequiturs.

You must have run out of money for booze before your next social security check and gotten real ornery.
 
So you believe ******* should be put on the streets returned to the sex trafficers or held in facilities where they go to school and are fed.

My position is that there might be a solution that doesn't involve putting ******* in cages or giving them to sex traffickers. Both of those things are bad.

Do you think putting children in cages is bad? You haven't actually told us, but it sounds like you think it's good, which should mean that you like Obama's policy but you like Trump's more because he puts more ******* in cages.
 
You gave a definition of socialism that couldn't include Venezeula, but also said Venezuela is socialist. I showed that it was a contradiction.

Rather than actually address what I've said, you spend untold pages throwing out insults and non-sequiturs.

You must have run out of money for booze before your next social security check and gotten real ornery.
[/Q
😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹

You mean, no Democrats want to defend ya'll's insanity and hatred of this country.
You really think, we hate this country? Or is this emotional fuel?
 
Update your records. She can get you if she says it's casing her emotional distress, according to Florida's statutes,
If she drinks as much as you say, then she could be a little manic, and would be game for a civil suit.
It's called revenge porn and it doesn't matter if you had consent at the time:

Revenge porn – posting or distributing intimate photographs, images, or videos of another person on the Internet, without the person’s consent and in order to harass or upset that person-- is a crime, known as “sexual cyberharassment,” in Florida. (Fla. Stat. Ann. §784.049).
Revenge porn is a form of nonconsensual pornography (NCP), and most often involves a scorned or disgruntled ex-partner posting nude or revealing photos or videos of the other person, or photos or videos of the two engaged in sexual acts. These might be photos taken with permission, or photos that the victim shared with the poster while they were involved (perhaps suggestive selfies sent via text), but without permission to post publicly. Strangers also can engage in NCP, by hacking into others’ accounts or devices and posting images they find there.

Florida’s Sexual Cyberharassment Law
Under Florida’s sexual cyberharassment statute, it is a crime to publish a sexually explicit image of another person on the Internet that conveys the person’s identification information

  • without the person’s consent
  • without a legitimate purpose, and
  • with the intent to cause substantial emotional distress.
A first offense of sexual cyber harassment is a first degree misdemeanor and a second or subsequent offense is a third degree felony. A victim of sexual cyberharassment also may initiate a civil action under Florida’s cyber sexual harassment law, discussed further below.

The crime of sexual cyberharassment occurs in Florida if the act of posting the photo or video occurred in Florida or the harm occurred there. For example, if Joe posts a photo of Mary from a computer in Texas without her consent, but Mary lives in Florida and suffers serious emotional distress there, the crime has occurred in Florida.

What Is a “Sexually Explicit Image?”
A sexually explicit image is an image depicting nudity or a person engaged in sexual conduct. An image depicting nudity is one that shows enumerated parts or areas of the human body uncovered or covered only by see-through material. These body parts or areas include male or female genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or the female breast below the top of the nipple. An image of a covered penis in a turgid (aroused) state also is considered an image depicting nudity. (Fla. Stat. §847.001.)

An image of one or more persons engaged in sexual conduct includes acts of masturbation, actual or simulated sexual intercourse, and physical contact with a person’s clothed or unclothed genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or the female breast.
-------------------------

You must really trust your ex. Good for you.
Under Florida’s sexual cyberharassment statute, it is a crime to publish a sexually explicit image of another person on the Internet that conveys the person’s identification information
  • without the person’s consent - She gave consent. My guess is 80-90% of the vids posted and reposted are violating the law.
Aww ******* I fell into the liberal deflect trap. You got me. But not in November!
 
You gave a definition of socialism that couldn't include Venezeula, but also said Venezuela is socialist. I showed that it was a contradiction.

Rather than actually address what I've said, you spend untold pages throwing out insults and non-sequiturs.

You must have run out of money for booze before your next social security check and gotten real ornery.

😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂

No I gave the affirmed and accepted definition accepted world wide by economist, leaders and academics. You on the other hand made up some BS bloviation and tired to make the bs stick so you were not epically wrong, and you failed. Oh and "my definition' comes from the guy who made up the theory that "Socialism" is derived from.

You should go back read the exchange. Focus on where I document the 2006 nationalization of almost all businesses. That would be right before you made the Reductio ad absurdum that proved my point correct. FYI only you and few other Hipster Bernie Bros, needing socialism to be nebulous, are ignorant enough to claim Venezuela wasn't socialist. Oh and the Venezuelans say they are and were socialist. Yet again you and only a few hipsters think otherwise.

And really you dropped two stats some foolish claims and thought, because you said one was from Fox, it made it so. Especially when one of your stats disproved your argument off the bat.
 
My position is that there might be a solution that doesn't involve putting ******* in cages or giving them to sex traffickers. Both of those things are bad.

Do you think putting children in cages is bad? You haven't actually told us, but it sounds like you think it's good, which should mean that you like Obama's policy but you like Trump's more because he puts more ******* in cages.

******* are not put in "cages." You are trying to illicit an emotional response.

They are held in climate controlled holding areas until they are processed. In many cases, your "cage" is nicer than where they came from. It is a sad and necessary negative in dealing with their and their parents or "owners" criminal behavior and possible illnesses like tuberculosis . Once they are processed they are transferred to a dorm and attend school, receive medical treatment and are fed. In most cases they are cared for better than our own homeless citizens and vets.

So how do you fix this?
 
Oh and "my definition' comes from the guy who made up the theory that "Socialism" is derived from.

If you're appealing to Marx, he would probably agree with you that Venezuela is not socialist

Focus on where I document the 2006 nationalization of almost all businesses.

No, you claimed that Chavez' family overtook all businesses in Venezuela, but with no proof whatsoever. That wasn't true, and even if it was, that's called an "oligopoly", like what Russia has had since its transition to "free market Capitalism", not socialism.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top