Biden did racist stuff in the past. Yes. There's not really much point in going on and on and on about this, except maybe to try to make yourself feel better about voting for the current racist and all-around shitheel Donald Q Trump
Wake Up, America! Wake Up! PLEASE!!
- Thread starter Drillher4me
- Start date
- Status
Just real quick where has socialism worked? Name one Socialist or Communist country that didn't crush the lives of everyone except the 'leaders" making everyone else equally miserable.
And no, Finland, Norway or Sweden are not Socialist. And the effective rate, not including vat is 53.35% in Finland. You know a county with a population the same as Houston. A homogenized socially congruent population who sees government hands has bad and now with mass immigration most are moving away from "Single Payer" it is bankrupting their country.
No No No. Maybe I didn’t express myself correctly if your comment was directed to me. I am actually disappointed I feel again like I did in 2016. One and only one choice. I would vote for anyone other than this current Democratic regime.. it just happens its the Orange man!
The US has socialism, it's just not democratic socialism. We bail out banks, we bail out airlines, we do not bail out people.
What? You are delusional and a kool aid drinking fool.
Biden did actual real racist ******* on the floor of Congress, just about 20 to 30 years ago and more recent. And so did the American Government, with his help, but Biden isn't a racist now, but America is, in your little minds, still the "The Most Raciest country ever" You Dems are psycho and ignorant.
And Biden really did sexually assaults little girls on national TV. He really did say "if you don't vote for me you ain't black", last week. He really told a Black Supporter, "You Dog Face Pony Solider," He really told a story about how he liked little Black ******* rubbing his harry legs at the pool, Really?
Yet when I ask you "leftist" for Trumps racism you guys pull out the same three discredit bullshit stories. And forget the 2 year relationship with a Black Model, All the Black Leaders and Dems who praised him for Decades, and the awards from the NAACP. I am beginning to think you leftist don't know what racism is.
I have asked this 100x. What laws or EOs has he proposed that target and injured Black People? What laws has he proposed or EOed that target and injured Gay People? Name the law or EO and date.
No, No Ridge or Ed or Sub, not some conspiracy theory innuendo article with one out of context quote and a ******* ton of liberal conjecture "could be", "should be" (because us liberal want it to be true), "appears to", or "maybe" BS. Actual enforceable law or Exec Order.
Wrong. Nice try skippy. Way to stick with that ignorant narrative.
Socialism and Socialized are not the same thing.
So again name a socialist or communist government that didn't destroied itself while the leaders lived grand and the rest died starving or viaousands to millions via starvation or genocide.
Before he came to office he had housing discrimination, he had employment discrimination, he discriminated in his casinos, he had the whole racist "birther" bullshit that was the whole reason his political start rose in the first place.
Since coming to office, we had a travel ban. The revisionist right has tried to paint this as an Obama policy, but Trump's words speak for themselves:
Just like these words
Hate crimes are spiking all over the country under this garbage president. Do the math
Since coming to office, we had a travel ban. The revisionist right has tried to paint this as an Obama policy, but Trump's words speak for themselves:
Trump said:
Just like these words
Trump said:
KKK leader said:
Hate crimes are spiking all over the country under this garbage president. Do the math
LOL ok explain the difference then skippy
A perfect example of a elementary level understanding coupled with massive amounts of hubris and self righteousness you have put on displayed.
You really have no idea.
If you just go straight to insults you don't come across as sounding smart, you just sound frustrated and confused.
Did you read your links?
1970s. Really. They're the same event. Not employment both were rental claims settled to give the government their shake down money. You clearly have no idea how the world works.
The one in 1992 was his managers, two levels down I bet, moving deals to satisfy an angry 'whale' And unnamed "witness" made the accusation.
Yeah that was D. Trump. NOT.
The Muslim ban. Talking point propaganda. It was not a Muslim ban, go catch up. The travel restrictions were directed at a small number of countries pick by Obama know for anti US terrorist and terrorist training activities. How can it be a ban on Muslims when it did not include the 2 countries with the largest Muslim Populations? In fact most Muslim countries were not included.... Opps I guess you fucked that up.
You peddle this week ******* and then add quotes from two people. This is what you got. Biden did what he did in Congressional Meetings. Out of his Own mouth. And he voted it the same way.
Again. Laws, Executive Orders from the last 4 years. Name them.
Except... Trump said himself it was to shut down Muslims from entering the country. It's his own damn quote.
Is the sky pink on your planet?
No you go read up and try to catch up.
Again, name a country, they themselves identify in mass as being socialist or communist, that worked.
You hiding with this jab.
Bolivia and New Zealand are controlled by parties with "socialist" in the name.
Since you refuse to give me your own personal magic definition of socialism, I'm not sure which other countries I can name.
Since you refuse to give me your own personal magic definition of socialism, I'm not sure which other countries I can name.
No he didn't.
I am calling on this. Provide the video or the official, not some liberal report, the official transcript where he said it.
Oh and you said racist. Muslim is not a race also, but I know you have to use this, its all you got.
So where is that law. Especially not one Obama started?
Hopefully your brain hasn't stroked out to the point where you now think the Cato Institute is a "liberal report"
No. Not working on its' own. Try again.
I will save you time. There is not one. Never has worked on it's own. Ever. Always supported by US aid, and now World Bank and the Feds. Yes even Cuba and USSR.
You're just going to move the goalposts all over the place aren't you?
The US isn't socialist (even though it is) because it's "socialized"?
I assume the same applies to Canada, the UK, Ireland, and most of continental Northern Europe?
Bolivia doesn't count because they took a loan from the IMF (even though the US itself is racked by how many trillions of dollars of debt? somehow that doesn't count?)
New Zealand conveniently gets ignored entirely.
You just look ridiculous at this point.
The US isn't socialist (even though it is) because it's "socialized"?
I assume the same applies to Canada, the UK, Ireland, and most of continental Northern Europe?
Bolivia doesn't count because they took a loan from the IMF (even though the US itself is racked by how many trillions of dollars of debt? somehow that doesn't count?)
New Zealand conveniently gets ignored entirely.
You just look ridiculous at this point.
Hopefully your brain hasn't stroked out to the point where you now think the Cato Institute is a "liberal report"
So here is the only official statement from Trump statement in your article. A linked tweet,
"That's right, we need a TRAVEL BAN for certain DANGEROUS countries, not some politically correct term that won't help us protect our people!"
The story links to the hyper leftist Washington Post that "quotes" what he said in a "rally" without a video or audio. Really?
So again, you are citing rhetoric. I said law. And this law, was up held by the courts. So his law didn't ban Muslims it targeted small number of countries Obama picked. Again a religion not a race.
So try again.
Dude he called it a "Muslim ban" live on national television in the debates
Also he had to revise the EO, because the courts knocked it down the first time. Because it was unconstitutional. Because you can't single out a race or religion, which the courts determined the ban was trying to do. It got through the second time because they watered it down just enough.
Maybe stop getting your talking points from some old chewed-up and recycled Dinesh D'Souza hot takes
Also he had to revise the EO, because the courts knocked it down the first time. Because it was unconstitutional. Because you can't single out a race or religion, which the courts determined the ban was trying to do. It got through the second time because they watered it down just enough.
Maybe stop getting your talking points from some old chewed-up and recycled Dinesh D'Souza hot takes
- Status
