I just see the facts and the world as it is...….you people keep your head in the sand and believe what you WANT to believe
WRONG - it’s PAINFULLY obvious it’s the demented Dems that believe what they wanna believe not reality - just look at you ;]
I just see the facts and the world as it is...….you people keep your head in the sand and believe what you WANT to believe
I'll have to side against you there @blkdlaur as @subhub174014 documents a lot. So he has facts but he arrives at conclusions we disagree with. Just as I once told him before when it comes to Trump we see his glass half full of water, whereas @subhub174014 prefers to see his glass half full of air. Both observations are correct when observing a glass of water. But the problem is after the election in November 2020 it is either Trump is back in as POTUS or he is out with unprecedented emotions on each camp for or against Trump.WRONG - it’s PAINFULLY obvious it’s the demented Dems that believe what they wanna believe not reality - just look at you ;]
WRONG - it’s PAINFULLY obvious it’s the demented Dems that believe what they wanna believe not reality - just look at you ;]
HEY - it’s Ukraine now - keep up !!! ;]
Actually it's the impeachment process now where all of the above charges and whatever else the Dems can find will be scrutinized. If Trump is found guilty he can be ****** out as POTUS, otherwise he gets a chance to run for his re-election where there is a strong likelihood he would be re-elected.you waste a lot of space …..saying nothing....it is Ukraine.....Russia....money laundering....profiting from the office....tax fraud....Syria.....Turkey....and soooo much more......climb out of that hole and pay attention
Actually it's the impeachment process now where all of the above charges and whatever else the Dems can find will be scrutinized. If Trump is found guilty he can be ****** out as POTUS, otherwise he gets a chance to run for his re-election where there is a strong likelihood he would be re-elected.
Even if Trump is POTUS, I'm not sure if it is legally possible to enforce a subpoena on a sitting president? But if it is possible wherever in America he dwells he would have to appear in court, I think?a lot he gets by on because he is pres.....some still in courts because trump trying to hide....and that just adds to the obstruction case
sooner or later the hammer will drop
Even if Trump is POTUS, I'm not sure if it is legally possible to enforce a subpoena on a sitting president? But if it is possible wherever in America he dwells he would have to appear in court, I think?
That could be conceivable but laws get amended all the time. I am uncertain with those exact laws regarding impeachment, but consider in my country there was a time where sodomy was considered illegal, albeit over a longer period of time. Now it is something like jaywalking thanks to the LGBTQ+ movement. So maybe the process might have changed slightly since Clinton?yes he has to answer a subpoena...….funny how some in the trump camp are saying he doesn't.....and yet when Pompeo and graham and a few others were a part of the Clinton impeachment they said he did....what changed?....the laws haven't!
Even Clinton had to make a live feed tape in front of congress he didn't go in person....but his testimony was live
That could be conceivable but laws get amended all the time. I am uncertain with those exact laws regarding impeachment, but consider in my country there was a time where sodomy was considered illegal, albeit over a longer period of time. Now it is something like jaywalking thanks to the LGBTQ+ movement. So maybe the process might have changed slightly since Clinton?
An excerpt from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodomy_law:
Canada[edit]
Main article: LGBT rights in Canada
Before 1859, the Province of Canada prosecuted sodomy under the English Buggery Act. In 1859, the Province of Canada enacted its own buggery law in the Consolidated Statutes of Canada as an offence punishable by death. Buggery remained punishable by death until 1869. A broader law targeting all homosexual male sexual activity ("gross indecency") was passed in 1892, as part of a larger update to the criminal law of the new dominion of Canada.[29] Changes to the Criminal Code in 1948 and 1961 were used to brand gay men as "criminal sexual psychopaths" and "dangerous sexual offenders." These labels provided for indeterminate prison sentences. Most famously, George Klippert, a homosexual, was labelled a dangerous sexual offender and sentenced to life in prison, a sentence confirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada.[30] He was released in 1971.
By the way Canada was considered a province in 1859 because we were declared a country afterwards in 1867.
Canadian Confederation - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
well said, i cant believe the depths of stupidity Trump supporters will sink too. Consensual sex is bad, but ******* a 13 year old good, grabbing a woman's pussy without her permission good, but consensual sex bad, enriching yourself at the public expense good, but consensual sex bad. it really does take some serious cognitive dissonance to live in a Trump supporters world doesn't it. Now i am not saying that she was smart allowing her husband or anyone else take pictures of her, because that is not smart at all (especially if you dont control the photos), but Popadapulis is a fool and sell out if he thinks he is going to be elected to her seat.as usual....you have confused me with someone who cares about your opinion...….
A Dem would be someone who cares for America and the people in it....not someone trying to fuck the people and the country for all they can get
well considering the past of your elected president she was a model congress woman....what she did was consensual...…....just one of the many charges against your man was ******* a 13 year old....walking into the miss teen USA while they were undressed....admitted to public groping......infidelity…..sex with prostitutes.......and so much more...……..but she had consensual sex and gets in trouble...….and the man responsible for the pics being published....naturally a former trump campaign aid wanting her seat.....but now that they figured out that Popadapolous was behind the whole thing.....really doubt he gets her seat......but the way the right works who knows
your whole post is why i dont mess around with couples where the male is present, and i why i am so leery of white males on this site. you post as Latina4bbc, yet you are a male, with stolen videos and pictures. the woman probably has no clue that you have her video or pictures on here.I don't know Sub. You literally described a Dem. Are you sure you got the best answer correct. Did you hear congresswoman Katie Hill complain that she cannot believe her indiscretions would be weaponized to destroy her. I almost ******* from laughing so hard. Her dumb ass fellow dems have been doing that to the soon to be re-elected president for the past two and a half years.
What do you call a liberal?
Lying, cheating, promising, corrupt, haters, and then add your answer and we got it to the T!!
I suspect that Epstein was murdered to shut him up, Donald Trump has nothing to do with it, It is the Clintons that are suspected of having people eliminated every step in their political careers. Google it you ignorant Democrats, the facts are all there.Yeah - now blame President Trump for Epstein’s demise - why not - you blame him
for everything else - frick and frack - Dems are pathetic.
Actually it's the impeachment process now where all of the above charges and whatever else the Dems can find will be scrutinized. If Trump is found guilty he can be ****** out as POTUS, otherwise he gets a chance to run for his re-election where there is a strong likelihood he would be re-elected.
Impeachment would be the best chance for the Dems because they would not have to campaign against Trump. Just as Justin Trudeau somehow managed a minority and earned a second term in office with all of the issues that was weighing down on him I would think Trump could duplicate a similar victory, if not stronger. It all comes down to not just polls; or the concentration of people who heckle or cheer for Trump if they happen to see him randomly in public; but which side is best to bring out the vote.you dreamer...…..there is a percentage of people who do not want him impeached....but also don't want him in again either