Please login or become a member to view
We did this, but were told the wife didn't show enough skin or wasn't obviously a woman. That could be taken as an insult, and we found it strange since we'd seen other similar verifications went through.
 
We did this, but were told the wife didn't show enough skin or wasn't obviously a woman. That could be taken as an insult, and we found it strange since we'd seen other similar verifications went through.
A new video simply showing what you’re showing in your media would have been more than adequate.
 
A new video simply showing what you’re showing in your media would have been more than adequate.
We understand, but frankly we were a little turned off of the idea after being told the female in our verification video wasn't feminine enough when other videos passed that were seemingly the same. That was a little insulting.
 
We understand, but frankly we were a little turned off of the idea after being told the female in our verification video wasn't feminine enough when other videos passed that were seemingly the same. That was a little insulting.
We're verified on Quiver and will verify before meeting, as well.
 
We understand, but frankly we were a little turned off of the idea after being told the female in our verification video wasn't feminine enough when other videos passed that were seemingly the same. That was a little insulting.

That is completely false - you were in fact told the exact opposite as I’ll quote below….

“Appears feminine, however we must CLEARLY see that you are female as stated in the rules and shown in the examples.”
 
It is not false. Saying "It looks female, but not female enough. We need proof" is saying she doesn't look feminine enough.
 
We've posted our pictures, posted a video done by 2 people, with one that "appears feminine". That's enough as far as we're concerned, but we understand your position.
 

Media information

Album
Us
Added by
LastUnusedName
Date added
View count
1,188
Comment count
15

Share this media

Back
Top